| Author |
Message |
|
structuresguy
|
Posted: May 22, 2012 - 10:29 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jan 19, 2012 - 03:54 PM
Posts: 28
Status: Offline
|
Glad to see everyone joining the party. Interesting thing is if the Russians are having cost overruns and set backs I wonder how the Chinese are fairing. I know the realistic limits of thier capabilities and that goes without saying. More to come I imagine.
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htairf ... 20522.aspx |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 19, 2013 - 11:05 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
tacf-x
|
Posted: May 22, 2012 - 10:43 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Sep 17, 2011 - 03:25 AM
Posts: 431
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Status: Offline
|
| The Indian FGFA was delayed too. Isn't it beautiful how the Russian aviation fanbois (and Kopp's) beliefs that the Pak-Fa was going to number in the thousands by the 2020s is falling apart as we speak? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
popcorn
|
Posted: May 22, 2012 - 11:24 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Sep 24, 2008 - 09:55 AM
Posts: 2025
Status: Offline
|
| Yeah, and that's just for the basic aircraft not barring further delays.. doesn't include the avionics/mission systems.. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
popcorn
|
Posted: May 22, 2012 - 11:24 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Sep 24, 2008 - 09:55 AM
Posts: 2025
Status: Offline
|
| Yeah, and that's just for the basic aircraft not barring further delays.. doesn't include the avionics/mission systems.. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
jetnerd
|
Posted: May 22, 2012 - 11:58 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Apr 24, 2009 - 02:22 AM
Posts: 113
Location: Southern U.S.
Status: Offline
|
Hmm.. "ready for production in 2019", add 3 years for mission systems, a couple more (optimistically) before any squadron declares IOC. That would put them 20 years behind the F-22's IOC date of Dec. '05.
Wonder how far along our 6th gen fighter will be by then?  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
shingen
|
Posted: May 23, 2012 - 12:31 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jan 30, 2010 - 03:27 AM
Posts: 570
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
I was told that Russian engineers and scientists work for love of the motherland rather than love of money as the US engineers do.
I was also told that the T-50 would be produced in numbers and invalidate the F-35.
BTW, I was looking at some pictures of the T-50. The part of the aircraft structure with the engines in the rear appears to be bare metal. Is that just unpainted metal or is that the engine itself?
If it is the engine itself, what is the plan? Give up on IR LO or add weight and drag with some additional aircraft structure?
Oh wait, I know. The Russians have some plasma stealth thingy that makes it not matter, just like the T-10 would be able to devastate the Raptor and F-35 with radar plasma stealth. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Scorpion1alpha
|
Posted: May 23, 2012 - 12:45 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Moderator

Joined: Oct 21, 2005 - 01:47 AM
Posts: 1375
Status: Offline
|
|
structuresguy wrote:
Interesting thing is if the Russians are having cost overruns and set backs I wonder how the Chinese are fairing.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: If anyone thinks that just copying the shape of the F-22 will give you a stealthy fighter with it's performance, they are just kidding themselves. There is a heck of a lot more that makes up the F-22 and it isn't easy building this plane, for a reason.
Who out there is surprised that Russia and China are having difficulties? To those people, just the amount of T-50s and J-20s that exist and are flying should tell you something. |
_________________ I'm watching...
|
|
|
|
 |
|
munny
|
Posted: May 23, 2012 - 01:47 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jan 13, 2010 - 01:39 AM
Posts: 527
Status: Offline
|
| The t-50's flying at the moment amount to 0. They've been grounded since last August since 51 experienced terminal structural cracking. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
shingen
|
Posted: May 23, 2012 - 02:00 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jan 30, 2010 - 03:27 AM
Posts: 570
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
| This puts the F-35 issues in better perspective. Sure, the techniques of engineering get better but they keep giving the guys harder problems. Seems like everyone struggles at the bleeding dge. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
river_otter
|
Posted: May 23, 2012 - 03:07 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Aug 18, 2011 - 10:42 AM
Posts: 176
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
|
This actually makes me more optimistic about Sukhoi's chances. A nice healthy spoonful of reality could help the PAK-FA become real itself.
Yes, it will be very expensive to build a modern aircraft with advanced capabilities (even if those capabilities fall well short of the Raptor). And yes, it will take a long time to work out the bugs in a gaggle of technologies they barely have a grasp of, and no experience in. By being honest with themselves and Uncle Vladimir about this, they take a healthy step towards getting the space and funding they need to build the best PAK-FA they're capable of.
The only real risk is the Indians will get fed up enough with the delays or cost to seriously negotiate for some F35s instead. Sukhoi really needs their money to finish this project. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
popcorn
|
Posted: May 24, 2012 - 08:10 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Sep 24, 2008 - 09:55 AM
Posts: 2025
Status: Offline
|
| I'm wondering how much of an advance the T-50 represents over the Su-35? It's been reported that the electronics systems slated for the T-50 have been implemented in the Su-35. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
popcorn
|
Posted: May 24, 2012 - 09:10 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Sep 24, 2008 - 09:55 AM
Posts: 2025
Status: Offline
|
| Double post |
Last edited by popcorn on May 24, 2012 - 04:41 PM; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sprstdlyscottsmn
|
Posted: May 24, 2012 - 03:10 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Mar 10, 2006 - 01:24 AM
Posts: 1192
Status: Offline
|
| yeah, the claims that I hear are like saying the US put APG-77 and F119s into the F-15 and then RAM coated them. |
_________________ James,
-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic (WTF?)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
shingen
|
Posted: May 24, 2012 - 03:37 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jan 30, 2010 - 03:27 AM
Posts: 570
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
Where's the AESA?
Where's the engines?
Where's the LO IRST? The radar beacon they have now won't cut it.
Where's the IR LO features?
Closer to F-22 or closer to Silent Eagle?
It looks like a "stealth fighter" when you first look at it but I'm not sure after really analyzing it. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
wrightwing
|
Posted: May 24, 2012 - 04:19 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Oct 23, 2008 - 04:22 PM
Posts: 2021
Status: Offline
|
| The T-50 should be faster and more manueverable. How much more advanced the avionics are, is anybody's guess. It'll also have a considerably better RCS than a Flanker. It sounds more like a well equipped Typhoon/Rafale class aircraft, with a better RCS. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|