| Author |
Message |
|
Henrik
|
Posted: May 05, 2012 - 11:59 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 12, 2005 - 02:32 AM
Posts: 1968
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 19, 2013 - 12:58 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Bjorn
|
Posted: May 05, 2012 - 01:39 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: May 27, 2003 - 07:56 PM
Posts: 1431
Status: Offline
|
Henrik,
We believe it is 88-0433.
Greets, |
_________________ Bjorn Claes
F-16.net Editor
Photo Library Admin
Aircraft Database Admin
|
|
|
|
 |
|
JochemP
|
Posted: May 05, 2012 - 08:52 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Aug 31, 2006 - 11:50 PM
Posts: 292
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Henrik
|
Posted: May 05, 2012 - 09:31 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 12, 2005 - 02:32 AM
Posts: 1968
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
deadseal
|
Posted: May 06, 2012 - 05:07 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Jan 13, 2008 - 01:17 AM
Posts: 309
Status: Offline
|
| its a widow jet. you guys may want to update the database. the rams closed awhile ago and the widows and funyuns picked up a the jets |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Henrik
|
Posted: May 06, 2012 - 10:57 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 12, 2005 - 02:32 AM
Posts: 1968
Status: Offline
|
|
deadseal wrote:
its a widow jet. you guys may want to update the database. the rams closed awhile ago and the widows and funyuns picked up a the jets
That´s true, deadseal - the South Dakota ANG received a mix of jets from all three squadrons at Hill when they converted to Block-40s in 2010, as the 34th FS stood down.
Now the 4th and 421st FSs - and the 466th "associate" -have a total of nearly 60 aircraft.
Cheers,
Henrik. |
_________________ Vipers Vorever!!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/49266321@N00/
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Asif
|
Posted: May 06, 2012 - 07:30 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Aug 23, 2003 - 01:02 PM
Posts: 2799
|
|
deadseal wrote:
its a widow jet. you guys may want to update the database. the rams closed awhile ago and the widows and funyuns picked up a the jets
Database updated. Anyone got a date for the transfer. |
_________________ Asif Shamim
F-16.net Editorial staff & Patch Gallery Administration
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Henrik
|
Posted: May 10, 2012 - 11:06 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 12, 2005 - 02:32 AM
Posts: 1968
Status: Offline
|
|
Asif wrote:
deadseal wrote:
its a widow jet. you guys may want to update the database. the rams closed awhile ago and the widows and funyuns picked up a the jets
Database updated. Anyone got a date for the transfer.
Asif,
I believe she was transferred as the 34th closed down in 2010.
Cheers,
Henrik. |
_________________ Vipers Vorever!!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/49266321@N00/
|
|
|
|
 |
|
EOR
|
Posted: May 10, 2012 - 10:47 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: May 19, 2008 - 05:52 PM
Posts: 113
Location: las vegas, nevada
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Gamera
|
Posted: Sep 08, 2012 - 05:45 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: May 23, 2005 - 08:54 AM
Posts: 663
Status: Offline
|
http://www.startribune.com/nation/16879 ... ml?refer=y
Air Force: Engine failure caused F-16C Falcon to crash in Utah training range; pilot ejected
Updated: September 6, 2012 - 1:35 PM
NORFOLK, Va. - A fighter plane crashed during a training mission in Utah this May because of an engine failure that possibly could have been avoided if inspectors had noticed an anomaly in a fan blade when it was installed in 2004, according to an Air Force report released Thursday. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
ruderamronbo
|
Posted: Sep 09, 2012 - 04:09 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jan 07, 2005 - 11:36 PM
Posts: 85
Location: Wright Patterson
Status: Offline
|
|
Gamera wrote:
http://www.startribune.com/nation/168790886.html?refer=y
Air Force: Engine failure caused F-16C Falcon to crash in Utah training range; pilot ejected
Updated: September 6, 2012 - 1:35 PM
NORFOLK, Va. - A fighter plane crashed during a training mission in Utah this May because of an engine failure that possibly could have been avoided if inspectors had noticed an anomaly in a fan blade when it was installed in 2004, according to an Air Force report released Thursday.
Could/should this anomaly have been detected during 8 subsequent years of post flight and periodic maintenance inspections? Not throwing stones just curious about what can be seen looking down the intake.
Also, is 8 years of installation normal for an Viper motor? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Boman
|
Posted: Sep 09, 2012 - 10:37 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 08, 2004 - 08:22 PM
Posts: 1106
Status: Offline
|
| Engines can be completelly fine for a long time, then suddenly what started as a little crack can be a major problem as in this instance. So in one way, you are correct it MAY have been something that should have been discovered - or on the other hand it may not have been. Difficult to say without more details on what the problem with the fan blade was. |
_________________ Best regards
Niels
http://s587.photobucket.com/albums/ss316/NC-Boman/
|
|
|
|
 |
|
neurotech
|
Posted: Sep 09, 2012 - 07:52 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: May 09, 2012 - 10:34 PM
Posts: 1254
Status: Offline
|
|
ruderamronbo wrote:
Gamera wrote:
http://www.startribune.com/nation/168790886.html?refer=y
Air Force: Engine failure caused F-16C Falcon to crash in Utah training range; pilot ejected
Updated: September 6, 2012 - 1:35 PM
NORFOLK, Va. - A fighter plane crashed during a training mission in Utah this May because of an engine failure that possibly could have been avoided if inspectors had noticed an anomaly in a fan blade when it was installed in 2004, according to an Air Force report released Thursday.
Could/should this anomaly have been detected during 8 subsequent years of post flight and periodic maintenance inspections? Not throwing stones just curious about what can be seen looking down the intake.
Also, is 8 years of installation normal for an Viper motor?
They are saying the fan blade was installed 8 years ago. I'm pretty sure the engine didn't stay in the jet that long. It would have been borescoped multiple times for inspections. I don't think they CT Scan complete engines routinely, although I've seen it done with a bizjet engine by a university. Even a 2D X-Ray of a fan disk might help, but again it would be very expensive to do outside depot overhaul interval.
This has to be balanced with the cost of replacing a $30-$60m F-16 after the pilot ejects out. There have been cases of F-16s doing a successful engine-out landing. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
cutlassracer
|
Posted: Sep 11, 2012 - 06:31 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Mar 08, 2006 - 01:33 AM
Posts: 393
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Status: Offline
|
| Some cracks are just real hard to see, and sometimes impossible with out xray or die penatrent. |
_________________ Torrejon, Homestead, Moody, Osan, Holloman
USAF Crew Chief 89-99
F-16D 90-0794/90-0779
F-117A 83-0807
|
|
|
|
 |
|
maus92
|
Posted: Sep 11, 2012 - 03:40 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: May 21, 2010 - 06:50 PM
Posts: 1185
Location: Annapolis, MD
Status: Offline
|
Here is a timeline of the F-16 mishap a few weeks ago in Utah. For all those who consider the risk of a single engine failure low, they still do happen with some regularity. This one did not allow the aircraft to recover to a nearby airfield:
"Zero Seconds: Engine explodes.
Plus 5 Seconds: “Troll 12’s emergency.”
Plus 18 Seconds: Aircraft Number “2 just lost the motor, heading out west towards Eagle” range, flat and desolate, away from mountains.
Plus 46 Seconds: Attempting “second restart now, looks like it’s not going anywhere. I felt a pretty big bang.”
Plus 77 seconds: “Passing 6000 [Mean Sea Level, about 2,000 feet above the ground] now, motor’s still at 30% [RPM], I’m getting out.”
Plus 96 seconds: Canopy warning light illuminates, indicating ejection."
Read more: http://nation.time.com/2012/09/11/96-se ... z26AUaMfhI |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|