Forum: General F-22A Raptor forum

Raptors in the Sandbox



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
bandit66
PostPosted: Apr 28, 2012 - 07:57 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Jun 18, 2007 - 05:39 AM
Posts: 176

Status: Offline
Theres a picture up on airliners of HO 4099 going through spain a few days ago......49th for the first F-22 combat kills??? Twisted Evil
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Jun 20, 2013 - 12:45 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
Siesta
PostPosted: Apr 28, 2012 - 10:47 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: May 02, 2004 - 07:18 AM
Posts: 311

Status: Offline
So far most of the recent F-22 deployments to the Central Command Area - there were also F-15Cs with them. Langley F-22s had F-15Cs from Lakenheath and then later Kadena in the area ie validating the Hunter-Killer teams. Right now Mass ANG F-15Cs from the 104th are also in the CENTCOM area.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Scorpion1alpha
PostPosted: Apr 28, 2012 - 11:52 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Moderator
F-16.net Moderator


Joined: Oct 21, 2005 - 01:47 AM
Posts: 1375

Status: Offline
bandit66 wrote:
49th for the first F-22 combat kills??? Twisted Evil

Well, if something happens, which one will be the first?



Out of those, I hope it's this one:



Why? Because:

1) Its an overrated turkey. Yet inexplicably popular with the uninformed public.

2) It'll be like slapping the US Navy's face too as they so talked up the Tomkitty all those years.

3) Getting footage of 2 heads in your HUD is always better than one!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
bandit66
PostPosted: Apr 29, 2012 - 03:20 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Jun 18, 2007 - 05:39 AM
Posts: 176

Status: Offline
Siesta wrote:
So far most of the recent F-22 deployments to the Central Command Area - there were also F-15Cs with them. Langley F-22s had F-15Cs from Lakenheath and then later Kadena in the area ie validating the Hunter-Killer teams. Right now Mass ANG F-15Cs from the 104th are also in the CENTCOM area.



The 159th is also over there with F-15C's.

As for the first kill? Id bet it will be the F-14's as they are used as the main defense fighter. Although they do have a bunch of F-4E's just across the gulf.....
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Siesta
PostPosted: Apr 29, 2012 - 12:56 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: May 02, 2004 - 07:18 AM
Posts: 311

Status: Offline
Why? Because:

1) Its an overrated turkey. Yet inexplicably popular with the uninformed public.

2) It'll be like slapping the US Navy's face too as they so talked up the Tomkitty all those years.

Tomcat bashing???

I hope your just thinking in terms of air to air - but then again if you havent experienced or be able to see what F-14s can do during Red Flag or Naval exercises you may think differently. Of course those don't count!

As far as the multi-role fighter the F-14s proved to be outstanding in Desert Fox, Allied Force, OEF, and OIF.

And by the way - during the Iran/Iraq War the Iranians have lost F-14s in air to air combat .. so thats old news.

I heard that the F-22 force was a combined 90th AK/7th HO package.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
sferrin
PostPosted: Apr 29, 2012 - 02:39 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 22, 2005 - 04:23 AM
Posts: 1617

Status: Offline
Scorpion1alpha wrote:
Why? Because:

1) Its an overrated turkey. Yet inexplicably popular with the uninformed public.


Over rated? Sounds like a hater to me. Laughing In what way was an F-14D over rated?

_________________
"There I was. . ."
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
sciafer
PostPosted: Apr 29, 2012 - 03:16 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Feb 02, 2004 - 12:18 AM
Posts: 129

Status: Offline
Ahhhh COMSEC at its best.....
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Scorpion1alpha
PostPosted: Apr 29, 2012 - 05:21 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Moderator
F-16.net Moderator


Joined: Oct 21, 2005 - 01:47 AM
Posts: 1375

Status: Offline
I make no bones about it...I'm a card carrying F-14 hater. As I'm a hater:



As my post yesterday is in context with the topic at hand, I'm not going to get distracted and go off of it. So here's a few more interesting / amusing articles on the topic:

http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/awx_04_26_2012_p0-452466.xml

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/04/27/us-deploys-f-22s-to-base-near-iran/

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/world/2012-04/29/c_131559800.htm

_________________
I'm watching...
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
strykerxo
PostPosted: Apr 29, 2012 - 06:26 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Mar 21, 2008 - 04:40 AM
Posts: 301

Status: Offline
delvo wrote:
Scorpion1alpha wrote:
Come on Iran, you must have someone in the IRIAF brave enough to go and dance with the F-22...
They'd need to know it's there first. But aside from that...

Why exactly would anyone WANT there to be a fight? You see all-out war as inevitable and prefer sooner rather than later?


Who wants war? War is the inevitable conclusion of man's pride unchecked, sometimes neccessary, sometimes not, whether a street fight or WW3!!!! Heed history and possibly see the future. Iran maybe a nuisance, but the sabre rattling on both sides, lead us down the road. Aggressor and Defender

A well known quote story about Gen Patton.

On May 7, 1945, just before the German capitulation, Patton had a conference in Austria with U.S. Secretary of War Robert Patterson. Patton was gravely concerned over the Soviet failure to respect the demarcation lines separating the Soviet and American occupation zones. He was also alarmed by plans in Washington for the immediate partial demobilization of the U.S. Army.

Patton said to Patterson: "Let's keep our boots polished, bayonets sharpened, and present a picture of force and strength to the Red Army. This is the only language they understand and respect."

Patterson replied, "Oh, George, you have been so close to this thing so long, you have lost sight of the big picture."

Patton rejoined: "I understand the situation. Their (the Soviet) supply system is inadequate to maintain them in a serious action such as I could put to them. They have chickens in the coop and cattle on the hoof -- that's their supply system. They could probably maintain themselves in the type of fighting I could give them for rive days. After that it would make no difference how many million men they have, and if you wanted Moscow I could give it to you. They lived on the land coming down. There is insufficient left for them to maintain themselves going back. Let's not give them time to build up their supplies. If we do, then . . . we have had a victory over the Germans and disarmed them, but we have failed in the liberation of Europe; we have lost the war!"

Millions died and persecuted in the wake of WW2.

_________________
You can't shot what you can't see - Unknown
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Siesta
PostPosted: Apr 29, 2012 - 06:50 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: May 02, 2004 - 07:18 AM
Posts: 311

Status: Offline
sciafer wrote:
Ahhhh COMSEC at its best.....


Think you meant OPSEC.... COMSEC is more the equipment and documents used for secure communications.

Theres been a whole thread or two about the very touchy subject of movement of aircraft..
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Siesta
PostPosted: Apr 29, 2012 - 07:02 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: May 02, 2004 - 07:18 AM
Posts: 311

Status: Offline
Scorpion1alpha wrote:
I make no bones about it...I'm a card carrying F-14 hater. As I'm a hater:



As my post yesterday is in context with the topic at hand, I'm not going to get distracted and go off of it. So here's a few more interesting / amusing articles on the topic:

http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/awx_04_26_2012_p0-452466.xml

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/04/27/us-deploys-f-22s-to-base-near-iran/

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/world/2012-04/29/c_131559800.htm


Yes.. get back on topic!!!! Laughing
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
shingen
PostPosted: Apr 29, 2012 - 07:24 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jan 30, 2010 - 03:27 AM
Posts: 570
Location: California
Status: Offline
Maybe a topic in Modern Military Aircraft?

F-14, Turkey or Tom Cruise-Worthy?
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
structuresguy
PostPosted: Apr 29, 2012 - 08:18 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Jan 19, 2012 - 03:54 PM
Posts: 32

Status: Offline
Raptor deployments around the globe have become normal ops. News worth yes, front page worthy......no.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Scorpion1alpha
PostPosted: Apr 29, 2012 - 08:38 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Moderator
F-16.net Moderator


Joined: Oct 21, 2005 - 01:47 AM
Posts: 1375

Status: Offline
Siesta wrote:
Yes.. get back on topic!!!! Laughing


LOL! Laughing

_________________
I'm watching...
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
awsome
PostPosted: Apr 30, 2012 - 02:24 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Dec 17, 2008 - 03:11 AM
Posts: 63
Location: vancouver
Status: Offline
I am kind of hoping it ends up being F-14 vs F-15. We need the real answer to "who's the best". Twisted Evil
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic