Forum: General F-35 Forum

F-35B completes first flighttest w/ external stores / pylons



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
maus92
PostPosted: Feb 23, 2012 - 10:49 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: May 21, 2010 - 06:50 PM
Posts: 1186
Location: Annapolis, MD
Status: Offline
NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND, PATUXENT RIVER, Md. – Over an Atlantic test range, Lockheed Martin test pilot Dan Levin flies F-35B test aircraft BF-2 with external weapons pylons for the first time Feb. 22. The test measured flying qualities with external pylons, inert AIM-9X Sidewinder air-to-air missiles and centerline 25 mm gun pod. Significant weapons testing for the F-35B and F-35C variants is scheduled for 2012, including fit checks, captive carriage, pit drop and aerial drop tests.

http://www.navair.navy.mil/index.cfm?fu ... mp;id=4923
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 22, 2013 - 3:57 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
spazsinbad
PostPosted: Feb 23, 2012 - 11:10 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 7847
Location: OZ
Good to know 'maus92' thanks. I guess some larger photos will be on LM website at Flikr soon enough? Meanwhile here is NavAir contribution:

"Over an Atlantic test range, Lockheed Martin test pilot Dan Levin flies F-35B test aircraft BF-2 with external weapons pylons for the first time Feb. 22. (Photo courtesy Lockheed Martin)"
Plus Zooms from:
http://www.navair.navy.mil/img/uploads/ ... 59_001.jpg
Plus ZOOMs from: http://www.navair.navy.mil/img/uploads/ ... 59_002.jpg
PlusZoomFrom:[FrontOnViewVLf-35B]
http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6115/6309 ... 583a_o.jpg



20120222_O_GR159_001.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  2.53 MB
 Viewed:  9685 Time(s)

20120222_O_GR159_001.jpg



20120222_O_GR159_002ZOOM.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  113.88 KB
 Viewed:  9665 Time(s)

20120222_O_GR159_002ZOOM.jpg



20120222_O_GR159_002.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  3.33 MB
 Viewed:  9663 Time(s)

20120222_O_GR159_002.jpg



20120222_O_GR159_001zoom.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  147.97 KB
 Viewed:  9645 Time(s)

20120222_O_GR159_001zoom.jpg



ZoomF-35BwingtipWinder.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  153.58 KB
 Viewed:  9519 Time(s)

ZoomF-35BwingtipWinder.jpg



F-35BwingtipsFrontOnVL.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  57.09 KB
 Viewed:  9510 Time(s)

F-35BwingtipsFrontOnVL.jpg



_________________
RAN FAA A4G: http://tinyurl.com/ctfwb3t http://tinyurl.com/ccmlenr http://www.youtube.com/user/bengello/videos


Last edited by spazsinbad on Feb 24, 2012 - 04:11 AM; edited 7 times in total
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
orkss
PostPosted: Feb 23, 2012 - 11:11 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Jul 29, 2011 - 08:44 AM
Posts: 49

Status: Offline
cool
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Meteor
PostPosted: Feb 23, 2012 - 11:19 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: May 14, 2007 - 08:46 PM
Posts: 168

Status: Offline
Anybody have any idea why the outboard missile rails are not on the wingtip, like stations 1&9 on the F-16, or the F-18, or Rafale or Typhoon or Gripen?

_________________
F-4C/D, F-16A/B/C/D, 727, DC-10, MD-80
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Prinz_Eugn
PostPosted: Feb 23, 2012 - 11:25 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 03, 2008 - 04:35 AM
Posts: 859

Status: Offline
Meteor wrote:
Anybody have any idea why the outboard missile rails are not on the wingtip, like stations 1&9 on the F-16, or the F-18, or Rafale or Typhoon or Gripen?


My guess would be antennae coverage. That's the reason why the trailing edge of the F-22s wing has that crank.

_________________
"A visitor from Mars could easily pick out the civilized nations. They have the best implements of war."
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
neptune
PostPosted: Feb 23, 2012 - 11:26 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Oct 24, 2008 - 01:03 AM
Posts: 1142
Location: Houston
Status: Offline
Meteor wrote:
Anybody have any idea why the outboard missile rails are not on the wingtip, like stations 1&9 on the F-16, or the F-18, or Rafale or Typhoon or Gripen?


Because these are better? Smile

Sorry, couldn't help myself Embarassed
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
usafr
PostPosted: Feb 23, 2012 - 11:33 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Feb 16, 2012 - 04:44 PM
Posts: 3
Location: Washington State
Status: Offline
Typhoon has outboard missile rails on its wingtips? Really?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
SpudmanWP
PostPosted: Feb 23, 2012 - 11:34 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4272
Location: California
Status: Online!
Lower RCS with it under the wing.

_________________
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
sufaviper
PostPosted: Feb 23, 2012 - 11:41 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Nov 01, 2011 - 04:30 PM
Posts: 131

Status: Offline
With the Wasp on the tail, BF-2 looks ready for a fight.

Anyone know if it was carrying internal weapons, like AF-1 did the other day?

Also I think the wing tip thing is related to the wing shape and stealth. I have never seen a Typhoon or Gripen wing up close, but F-16 and F-18 wings are "flat" on the bottom surface. The F-35 and F-22 have complex curves on the wing tip which would make it interesting to mount a rail there. Additionally the structure needed to mount a rail on the tip would be a pain for RCS. At least that would be my best educated guess.

Sufa Viper
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
bjr1028
PostPosted: Feb 24, 2012 - 03:54 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jul 07, 2009 - 04:34 AM
Posts: 503
Location: Dubuque, IA
Status: Offline
Meteor wrote:
Anybody have any idea why the outboard missile rails are not on the wingtip, like stations 1&9 on the F-16, or the F-18, or Rafale or Typhoon or Gripen?


Permanent wingtip rails would have a negative effect on RCS, even with no missile on them.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
archeman
PostPosted: Feb 24, 2012 - 04:24 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Dec 28, 2011 - 05:37 AM
Posts: 314
Location: CA
Status: Offline
Does anyone know the purpose of those little extra 'wings' on the pylons (positions 2, 3, 9, 10 I think) where they mate against the bottom of the wing? Is it just to provide additional stability or to RCS cover some components under them?
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
spazsinbad
PostPosted: Feb 24, 2012 - 06:20 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 7847
Location: OZ
Some of this info will be repeated elsewhere earlier however I think I missed the weapon testing part... Rolling Eyes

Here is the earlier repeat thread: Panetta Lifts F-35B Probation
http://www.f-16.net/index.php?name=PNph ... ler#213304

Panetta Lifts F-35B Probation Jan 20, 2012 By Amy Butler - AviationWeek.com

http://rpdefense.over-blog.com/article- ... 67465.html

"...With a much more productive year of testing in 2011 (following the abysmal performance of the Stovl variant in 2010), the test force is looking ahead to weapons separation trials this year, says Lt. Col. Matt Kelly, F-35 flight operations lead at the Patuxent River testing facility. The team has already conducted flights of the F-35B carrying weapons at subsonic and supersonic speeds. Initial flutter testing with the weapon bay doors open in flight have shown no significant problems, Kelly says. The major step, he says, is to drop weapons for the first time, a milestone expected in the second half of the year. Likely candidates will be the 500-lb. Joint Direct Attack Munition and the AIM-120 and AIM-9X missiles.

Thus far, the F-35B has been flown to Mach 1.4.

Kelly says he also expects to begin testing a redesigned tailhook for the F-35C in the second half of the year. The current design encountered problems last year when officials attempted rolling tests and the tailhook skipped over the wire owing to its weight and a problem with the dampening system. CF-3 will be the first test aircraft to have the new tailhook installed.

After the initial ship trials with the F-35B last fall, the B model is not expected to go to sea until 2013, with the C model following in 2015, Kelly said.

Aircraft BF-4 is now operating the Block 1A software and BF-5 is using the 1B software package. Kelly said the Block 2 software, which will be used by the Marine Corps to declare operational capability, is not expected at Patuxent River until late this year.

In addition to having multi-level security, the 1B software also will have new voice recognition technology that will allow the pilot to conduct some hands-free operations, such as switching the radio channels and squawking identification codes to air traffic control. Eventually, Kelly says, pilots hope to use the voice recognition technology for such operations as changing multi-function displays or shifting modes in the aircraft...."

_________________
RAN FAA A4G: http://tinyurl.com/ctfwb3t http://tinyurl.com/ccmlenr http://www.youtube.com/user/bengello/videos
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
spazsinbad
PostPosted: Feb 24, 2012 - 09:11 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 7847
Location: OZ
From e-mail received....



F-35BweaponTest.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  97.29 KB
 Viewed:  9402 Time(s)

F-35BweaponTest.jpg



_________________
RAN FAA A4G: http://tinyurl.com/ctfwb3t http://tinyurl.com/ccmlenr http://www.youtube.com/user/bengello/videos
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
1st503rdsgt
PostPosted: Feb 24, 2012 - 11:16 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Banned


Joined: Jan 23, 2011 - 01:23 AM
Posts: 1549

Status: Offline
Really nice to see the gun-pod in the air finally. I was afraid it had been neglected in light of all the other development problems. Hope it works better than those *A-16* experiments back in the day.

_________________
The sky is blue because God loves the Infantry.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
spazsinbad
PostPosted: Feb 24, 2012 - 12:35 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 7847
Location: OZ
Here is the original: http://www.codeonemagazine.com/f35_news ... tem_id=612

"East Coast External Carriage 23 February 2012
Photo by Michael D. JacksonThe first F-35B test flight with external weapons was carried out on 22 February 2012 at the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division test facility at NAS Patuxent River Maryland. The test mission, flown by Lockheed Martin test pilot Dan Levin, measured flying qualities with external pylons, inert AIM-9X Sidewinder air-to-air missiles, and the removable centerline 25mm gun pod. The four-barrel GAU-22/A Gatlin-type gun, built by General Dynamics Armament and Technical Products, is a derivative of the currently fielded GAU-12/U Equalizer. The missionized gun system designed for the F-35B and F-35C includes the F-35A-common GAU-22/A gun, a gun system control unit, and drive assembly. A helical linear linkless ammunition feed system is also contained in the pod."

http://www.codeonemagazine.com/images/n ... 4_8357.jpg



2012_News_F35B_12P00088_18_1269967624_8357.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  115.97 KB
 Viewed:  9312 Time(s)

2012_News_F35B_12P00088_18_1269967624_8357.jpg



_________________
RAN FAA A4G: http://tinyurl.com/ctfwb3t http://tinyurl.com/ccmlenr http://www.youtube.com/user/bengello/videos
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic