| Author |
Message |
|
southernphantom
|
 Posted: Aug 06, 2011 - 06:46 PM
|
 
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Aug 06, 2011 - 06:18 PM
Posts: 524
Location: Somewhere in Dixie
Status: Offline
|
| In terms of loiter time, situational awareness, payload, is a Block 30 Viper or a Phantom with a few upgrades, say MFDs for Maverick targeting and AN/APG-65 for its mapping and MTI features, which aircraft is generally going to be better for clear-weather close air support? Inclement weather? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: May 26, 2012 - 10:40 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
sprstdlyscottsmn
|
|
Posted: Aug 08, 2011 - 04:42 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Mar 10, 2006 - 01:24 AM
Posts: 1111
Status: Offline
|
| Phantom is a bigger plane overall so it will be better off in payload, but it has thirsty engines so it will have to use up some of that payload for fuel. Also, a loaded F-16 is about as agile as a clean phantom, so evading missiles or rapidly turning into a ground target will be easier in the Viper. |
_________________
James,
-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic (WTF?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
discofishing
|
|
Posted: Aug 08, 2011 - 08:35 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Nov 07, 2008 - 10:15 PM
Posts: 1145
Status: Offline
|
| How about we give the Viper CFTs, put the SABR AESA radar in the nose, upgrade the cockpit with full color moving map displays (heard some ANG units might actually have this) and call it a day. We have to think cost. As much as I'd love to see the Phantom back, it's not going to happen, even with all the OTS upgrades we could put in it. We don't have the money. America is fat, dumb and broke. Block 30 Vipers do a fine job with CAS as it stands now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Private Messages
Forum Guidelines
