Forum: Air Power

Thrust Vectoring in BFM



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
phantomfan
PostPosted: Feb 10, 2012 - 03:48 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Nov 18, 2011 - 09:47 PM
Posts: 2

Status: Offline
There is increasing use of thrust-vectoring nozzles in aircraft such as the F-22, SU-35, and new variants of the MIG-29.

I'm interested to hear a discussion on how thrust vectoring can be applied in both offensive and defensive BFM.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 24, 2013 - 10:59 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
LinkF16SimDude
PostPosted: Feb 11, 2012 - 01:33 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Jan 31, 2004 - 07:18 PM
Posts: 2365

Status: Offline
The current generation of TV jets use the nozzles to help the driver point the nose where he needs it to prosecute an attack and for precision handling in a low-speed, high-AOA regime. But back in the '82 Falklands War the Brits used a technique in their Harriers called VIFF-ing (Vectoring In Forward Flight). It doesn't do much for you in wings level flight but in a turn you can dramatically decrease your turn radius by vectoring the nozzles downward a bit (not full down) while pulling thru the turn. It can be used both defensively (to evade an air attacker or ground threat) and offensively (to quickly bring your nose to bear on an enemy jet or pull lead on it if needed).

Can't recall if they said it was effective or not but I heard one Brit driver say he was defensive against an Argentine jet and he VIFF-ed so quickly he practically vanished in front him. Laughing

The Harrier nozzle control is fully manual whereas the newer TV jets have electronically controlled nozzles. So any kinda Harrier-style VIFF-ing prolly won't happen in a Raptor or Sukoi, although I'm sure both have classified pitch rates that aren't being divulged or displayed at airshows. Whistle
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
archeman
PostPosted: Apr 14, 2012 - 08:25 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Dec 28, 2011 - 05:37 AM
Posts: 314
Location: CA
Status: Offline
For normal flight and fight, if you need your airframe to turn more sharply, then you can just increase the size of your airflow deflection panels.
You will pay aproximately 1/20th of overall cost+complexity compared to adding vectored thrust.
A lot of that cost will be in the flight control software that has an unusual dynamic to factor in.
Unless your airspeed drops very low, you just get so much more angular defection force from old school horizontal stabs that you need to start making up semi-fictional scenarios to keep investing in vectored thrust.

Thats why so few buyers have been willinng to pony up for it.
Oh I forgot, Airshows...that is where vectored thrust pays off the most methinks.
The F-22 may make use of vectored thrust to stay agile in the very high altitude flight profile???
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic