| Author |
Message |
|
irishlad
|
 Posted: May 02, 2011 - 09:20 PM
|
 
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 25, 2011 - 11:29 PM
Posts: 53
Status: Offline
|
Well, when you sponsor a movie i think you should expect a little over the top product placement in return..
just my 
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: Jun 19, 2013 - 6:25 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
grinner68
|
|
Posted: May 04, 2011 - 11:26 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Nov 27, 2010 - 08:01 PM
Posts: 73
Status: Offline
|
| I'd like to see a movie version of Warbirds and Force of Eagles. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pants3204
|
|
Posted: Apr 24, 2012 - 12:00 AM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Mar 15, 2012 - 04:42 AM
Posts: 116
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
|
|
grinner68 wrote:
I'd like to see a movie version of Warbirds and Force of Eagles.
Perhaps a film about more recent Red Flag events? I can't imagine how good visually that movie would be. (the planes and that flying thing are pretty cool too)
I would purchase that movie in a heartbeat. |
Last edited by pants3204 on Apr 24, 2012 - 12:28 AM; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
pants3204
|
|
Posted: Apr 24, 2012 - 12:02 AM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Mar 15, 2012 - 04:42 AM
Posts: 116
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
|
| In other news, I am kind of disappointed the new Top Gun is centered around the F-35. Personally the F-22 would have been much more appealing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
count_to_10
|
|
Posted: Apr 24, 2012 - 12:04 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Mar 10, 2012 - 03:38 PM
Posts: 1397
Status: Offline
|
| Actually, more cuts to the computer model of the combat when the chase plane lost track might have been more instructive. As it is, it looked like the F-15s were just waiting for the F-16 to get on there tails before trying to evade. |
_________________
Einstein got it backward: one cannot prevent a war without preparing for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SpudmanWP
|
|
Posted: Apr 24, 2012 - 12:28 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K
Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4347
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
| Top Gun Two (as in the original) is a NAVY movie. No F-22s on the carriers. |
_________________
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
Last edited by SpudmanWP on Apr 24, 2012 - 12:31 AM; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
SpudmanWP
|
|
Posted: Apr 24, 2012 - 12:29 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K
Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4347
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
| n/a |
_________________
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
|
|
|
|
|
|
pants3204
|
|
Posted: Apr 24, 2012 - 12:30 AM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Mar 15, 2012 - 04:42 AM
Posts: 116
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
|
|
SpudmanWP wrote:
Top gun is a NAVY movie. No F-22s on the carriers.
Yeah, thanks, just realized that.
Perhaps the antagonist should be an enemy so fierce as to cause the Navy and Air Force to join a joint coalition. Then, with the F-35 as the main role and an F-22 as a not-so-secondary role, would my desires for the perfect film be satiated. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st503rdsgt
|
|
Posted: Apr 24, 2012 - 01:25 AM
|
|
|
Banned
Joined: Jan 23, 2011 - 01:23 AM
Posts: 1549
Status: Offline
|
| The next Top Gun movie will be about ex-gamers flying X-47s from a Conex in the Nevada desert. |
_________________
The sky is blue because God loves the Infantry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
count_to_10
|
|
Posted: Apr 24, 2012 - 01:33 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Mar 10, 2012 - 03:38 PM
Posts: 1397
Status: Offline
|
|
pants3204 wrote:
SpudmanWP wrote:
Top gun is a NAVY movie. No F-22s on the carriers.
Yeah, thanks, just realized that.
Perhaps the antagonist should be an enemy so fierce as to cause the Navy and Air Force to join a joint coalition. Then, with the F-35 as the main role and an F-22 as a not-so-secondary role, would my desires for the perfect film be satiated.
Top Gun was about about pilots in peace time. The "enemy" only showed up briefly in the beginning and end to give the intervening drama more punch. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Private Messages
Forum Guidelines
