Forum: F-16 versus XYZ

Four F-16s vs one F/A-22



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
pucara70
PostPosted: Dec 29, 2008 - 08:27 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Nov 09, 2003 - 09:24 PM
Posts: 36

Status: Offline
The only way to know the truth is to put them in a real combat.....specialists, aviation gurus, "experts" have been wrong before, and could be wrong again...do you remember when they told Col. R. Olds not to train his pilots in doghfighting cos the missiles will do all the job???......MiG-17 were considered obsolete, but obtain some remarkable air to air kills.......ships were supposed to be inmune before the Malvinas War, but they weren´t.......new fighters return to a cannon....so....the only way to test that is real combat.....Just my two cents.

_________________
Duc in Altum
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 27, 2012 - 12:06 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
avon1944
PostPosted: Jan 06, 2009 - 08:39 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Nov 24, 2004 - 02:03 AM
Posts: 387

Status: Offline
pucara70 wrote:
ships were supposed to be inmune before the Malvinas War, but they weren´t.......new fighters return to a cannon....so....the only way to test that is real combat.....

I don't know where you were but, all navies have been extremely concerned ever since the Egyptian patrol boats fire Stxys Missiles and sunk the Israeli destroyer Eilat in Oct. 1967. Many warships have been hit by Exocet Missiles but, only one was sunk. The HMS Sheffield was sunk due to inadequate fire fighting capability. All other warships were damage, successfully fought the fires and survive, including the USS Stark a frigate, was struck by two Exocet Missiles and survived.
While there is all sorts of debate on the effectiveness of hard kill weapons against anti-ship missiles, seldom discussed and probably more effective are the soft-kill counter-measures.


The reality is the USAF knows a lot more about aerial combat from its air combat laboratories or live simulations now than they did decades ago. The F-22 has more technical advantages over any competition or operational fighters today than the F-15 had over the F-4, F-5, MiG-21, MiG-23, MiG-25's when the F-15 was introduced.... and look at the F-15's combat record! One significant advantage the F-22 has is a radar that will not set off any current RWR. So the F-22 charges into a combat space, locks up its victim and fires a missile and the victims first knowledge it is under attack is when its RWR goes off because the AMRAAM's terminal guidance radar has just activated. Not much time to take effective counter-actions.

Adrian
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2012 F-16.net