Forum: Civil and General Aviation

Question regarding the L-39



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
falcon17
PostPosted: Jan 14, 2012 - 04:25 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Sep 01, 2011 - 05:00 AM
Posts: 74
Location: Orlando
Status: Offline
I've been scratching my head and wondering. Is it be possible to upgrade an L-39 to a glass cockpit and side stick configuration?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 19, 2013 - 8:58 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
LinkF16SimDude
PostPosted: Jan 14, 2012 - 08:14 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Jan 31, 2004 - 07:18 PM
Posts: 2365

Status: Offline
IMO it'd be relatively easier to do the glass cockpit mod than the sidestick. You couldn't just move the stick to the right, make the required mechanical changes, and say Bob's Your Uncle. A SSC almost guarantees a conversion to FBW, so you'd have to completely redesign the FCS. Add an all-flying tail (no elevators or tabs). Run new plumbing and wiring and a hydraulic power source of at least 2000 psi to have any kind of surface authority. Then there's hardware to design, code to write, a testing regime to undergo, flight tests, yadda yadda yadda.... If it flies well already (and I'm sure it does), it's just not worth all that hassle just to have the stick on the side.

_________________
Why does "monosyllabic" have 5 syllables?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
madrat
PostPosted: Jan 14, 2012 - 08:37 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Mar 03, 2010 - 03:12 AM
Posts: 986

Status: Offline
I wouldn't be surprised if the L-39 was light enough you could stick with a mechanical side stick.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
LinkF16SimDude
PostPosted: Jan 14, 2012 - 11:48 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Jan 31, 2004 - 07:18 PM
Posts: 2365

Status: Offline
Light enough? Probably. It obviously works on the SR-22. But to get military style performance from a mechanical SSC, you'll almost certainly need at least some rudimentary assist. Hydraulically driven surfaces comes to mind. Move a pushrod, open/close a valve connected to the surface. The L-39 already has a hydraulic system for flaps, gear, speed brakes, etc. Is there enough pressure to drive the surfaces? And what would you do in the case of hydraulic failure? Mechanical reversion? My point is you're adding a level of complexity to an FCS that already works pretty well given the platform (it can do +8/-4g thank ya kindly) for a small amount of convenience and elbow room.

Just MHO. I could be all wet. Wink

_________________
Why does "monosyllabic" have 5 syllables?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
huggy
PostPosted: May 09, 2012 - 05:25 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Jan 27, 2004 - 07:39 AM
Posts: 349

Status: Offline
Glass cockpit: a friend of mine did his cockpit up in "glass", and it is beautiful.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic