| Author |
Message |
|
fang
|
Posted: Jan 25, 2012 - 03:50 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Oct 28, 2006 - 11:07 AM
Posts: 144
Status: Offline
|
|
spazsinbad wrote:
Israel makes fresh push to perform F-35 maintenance By: Arie Egozi | Tel Aviv 24 Jan 2012
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articl ... ce-367277/
"Israel's air force has again expressed its opposition to the idea of performing heavy maintenance work on its future fleet of Lockheed Martin F-35 combat aircraft outside Israel.
As part of the US stealth fighter programme, Lockheed and the US Air Force want to establish regional maintenance centres for the F-35, with one such facility planned for Italy.
During recent talks between the Israeli air force and the USAF, Israel's opposition to using an overseas facility was underlined. A source close to the issue said the Americans understand the Israeli service's "special needs", and that alternative ways are now being evaluated to perform heavy maintenance on the F-35 at its own bases.
Deliveries from Israel's first order for 20 conventional take-off and landing F-35As are expected to start in early 2017, the source said, adding there is also an understanding that the air force will get permission to interface some Israeli-developed systems or equipment following their arrival.
This possibility applies mainly to the aircraft's electronic warfare suite, as previous Israeli requests to equip the type with domestically manufactured equipment were rejected."
Interesting! that brings me to another issue, if Italy wo'nt order the planes in the coming LRIP-6 as scheduled or in any other close batch, doe's LM still gonna build there the Europe's main logistic and service center?
Article about Italy and the project
http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/ ... In%20Italy |
Last edited by fang on Jan 25, 2012 - 06:28 PM; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 23, 2013 - 2:17 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
Last edited by fang on Jan 25, 2012 - 06:28 PM; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
 |
|
m
|
Posted: Jan 25, 2012 - 06:12 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jan 01, 2011 - 11:40 PM
Posts: 623
Location: NL
Status: Offline
|
At this point it's worth pointing out the rumored defense cuts in Israel were incorrect and they are actually increasing defense spending.
fang wrote:
Interesting! that brings me to another issue, if Italy wo'nt order the planes in the coming LRIP-6 as scheduled or in any other close batch, doe's LM still gonna build there the Europe's main logistic and service center?
May be Spazsinbad has got more information about this?
Till so far haven’t read that much more then, in Italy maintenance of the F35 and a engine maintenance centre in the Netherlands (Maintenance Valley). Plus Norway some elements of the engines.
As far as I know this maintenance concerns mainly F35’s in Europe. Haven’t read anything this could include may be Israel as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
m
|
Posted: Jan 25, 2012 - 07:27 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jan 01, 2011 - 11:40 PM
Posts: 623
Location: NL
Status: Offline
|
Quote: Under the current JSF programme agreement, an F-35 buyer will have to send the jet to a maintenance centre, likely to be set up in Italy, on encountering any kind of mechanical malfunction.
http://www.airforce-technology.com/news/news74994.html
When maintenance will not be possible in Israel, in that case suppose maintenance of the F35I by a maintenance centre in the US. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SpudmanWP
|
Posted: Jan 25, 2012 - 08:10 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4273
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
That article is wrong.
Many maintenance items can and will be handled by the end user. The maintenance facilities in the US and Italy (and soon to be Japan) are for the most serious fixes requiring a teardown. |
_________________ "The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
hb_pencil
|
Posted: Jan 25, 2012 - 09:28 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Aug 18, 2011 - 10:50 PM
Posts: 541
Status: Offline
|
|
SpudmanWP wrote:
That article is wrong.
Many maintenance items can and will be handled by the end user. The maintenance facilities in the US and Italy (and soon to be Japan) are for the most serious fixes requiring a teardown.
IIRC: Each will usually enter an PBL type contract with an firm, like L3, who will do most depot related work. As you say, the most serious issues (like a complete refurb) will occur in places like US, Italy and Japan. Even then its questionable if that will occur for some countries like Turkey, Australia the UK and the Netherlands. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
m
|
Posted: Jan 25, 2012 - 09:46 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jan 01, 2011 - 11:40 PM
Posts: 623
Location: NL
Status: Offline
|
|
hb_pencil wrote:
SpudmanWP wrote:
That article is wrong.
Many maintenance items can and will be handled by the end user. The maintenance facilities in the US and Italy (and soon to be Japan) are for the most serious fixes requiring a teardown.
IIRC: Each will usually enter an PBL type contract with an firm, like L3, who will do most depot related work. As you say, the most serious issues (like a complete refurb) will occur in places like US, Italy and Japan. Even then its questionable if that will occur for some countries like Turkey, Australia the UK and the Netherlands.
Concerning maintenance in Europe, till so far known, Italy will do (complete refurb) the F35 and the Netherlands the F135 engines. a deal between Italy and the Netherlands. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
archeman
|
Posted: Jan 26, 2012 - 06:10 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Dec 28, 2011 - 05:37 AM
Posts: 314
Location: CA
Status: Offline
|
|
Quote:
Agreed. I don't see them backtracking on the F-35s. Outnumbered by hostile neighbors who are stocking up with increasingly advanced kit, Israel needs to maintain a technological edge.. Does Israel really face that serious a naval threat to justify the levels of spending for advanced warships?
popcorn - do you have a reference to the statement about neighbors stocking up with increasingly advanced kits? It seems to me that on balance many of Israeli's nearby real threats are not advancing in a way that will interfere with IAF operations substantially. There have been a lot of missile and guerrilla warfare advances uncomfortably close, but a 4thGen aircraft will be just as effective against those as a 5thGen.
Not to go off topic too far but what are the threat nations so that I can get a numerical measure to work with here. Some neighbors seem to be just posing as threats in their statements to satisfy internal consumers, but would really sooner attack Antarctica than Israel. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sufaviper
|
Posted: Jan 26, 2012 - 04:01 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Nov 01, 2011 - 04:30 PM
Posts: 131
Status: Offline
|
|
archeman wrote:
Quote:
Agreed. I don't see them backtracking on the F-35s. Outnumbered by hostile neighbors who are stocking up with increasingly advanced kit, Israel needs to maintain a technological edge.. Does Israel really face that serious a naval threat to justify the levels of spending for advanced warships?
popcorn - do you have a reference to the statement about neighbors stocking up with increasingly advanced kits? It seems to me that on balance many of Israeli's nearby real threats are not advancing in a way that will interfere with IAF operations substantially. There have been a lot of missile and guerrilla warfare advances uncomfortably close, but a 4thGen aircraft will be just as effective against those as a 5thGen.
Not to go off topic too far but what are the threat nations so that I can get a numerical measure to work with here. Some neighbors seem to be just posing as threats in their statements to satisfy internal consumers, but would really sooner attack Antarctica than Israel.
If I may, the tech of the countries in the region do mandate 5th gen to defend Israel (lots of 4+ gen F-16's to name one). And as for whether or not the countries are actual threats. I think 2 factors hold back a major assault on Israel, much like the many attempts in the last 40+ years. The surrounding countries are uncertain if they could win (Israel's tech advantage) and to a lesser degree the wrath of the West (any action at a minumum would cut off all foreign aid and incur an embargo from the US and likely NATO, EU and maybe the UN (Russia and China may veto)). I think Syria, Jordan, Iran, Lebanon and Palestine definately, and Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Iraq probably would like to see Israel gone and there is a lot of high end tech in that group.
Just my throughts from studying history and paying attention to the region.
Sufa Viper |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
wrightwing
|
Posted: Jan 26, 2012 - 08:22 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Oct 23, 2008 - 04:22 PM
Posts: 2022
Status: Offline
|
|
archeman wrote:
popcorn - do you have a reference to the statement about neighbors stocking up with increasingly advanced kits? It seems to me that on balance many of Israeli's nearby real threats are not advancing in a way that will interfere with IAF operations substantially. There have been a lot of missile and guerrilla warfare advances uncomfortably close, but a 4thGen aircraft will be just as effective against those as a 5thGen.
If Israel's neighbors get S-300/400, and other double digit SAMs, then a 4th Gen aircraft won't be particularly useful compared to a 5th Gen. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
archeman
|
Posted: Jan 26, 2012 - 08:44 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Dec 28, 2011 - 05:37 AM
Posts: 314
Location: CA
Status: Offline
|
|
Quote:
If I may, the tech of the countries in the region do mandate 5th gen to defend Israel (lots of 4+ gen F-16's to name one). And as for whether or not the countries are actual threats. I think 2 factors hold back a major assault on Israel, much like the many attempts in the last 40+ years. The surrounding countries are uncertain if they could win (Israel's tech advantage) and to a lesser degree the wrath of the West (any action at a minimum would cut off all foreign aid and incur an embargo from the US and likely NATO, EU and maybe the UN (Russia and China may veto)). I think Syria, Jordan, Iran, Lebanon and Palestine definitely, and Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Iraq probably would like to see Israel gone and there is a lot of high end tech in that group.
Just my thoughts from studying history and paying attention to the region.
Sufa Viper
Yes Sufa I concur with the thrust of your points here, but just having these neighbor Sunni arab nations wish there was no Israel is much like my daughter wishing there was a pink pony in the backyard. Not going to happen. Each country you named either has no means to stop 4thGen IAF or has very serious domestic concerns and non-Israeli border tensions for the next few years that will keep their hands very full. Getting back to the thread topic this may mean in my opinion that for defense of Israel, they may be able to well afford to wait for the F-35 w/out dropping out. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
thestealthfighterguy
|
Posted: Jan 27, 2012 - 12:29 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Sep 15, 2011 - 02:18 AM
Posts: 254
Location: Your six-O-clock
|
|
spazsinbad wrote:
Israel makes fresh push to perform F-35 maintenance By: Arie Egozi | Tel Aviv 24 Jan 2012
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articl ... ce-367277/
"Israel's air force has again expressed its opposition to the idea of performing heavy maintenance work on its future fleet of Lockheed Martin F-35 combat aircraft outside Israel.
As part of the US stealth fighter programme, Lockheed and the US Air Force want to establish regional maintenance centres for the F-35, with one such facility planned for Italy.
During recent talks between the Israeli air force and the USAF, Israel's opposition to using an overseas facility was underlined. A source close to the issue said the Americans understand the Israeli service's "special needs", and that alternative ways are now being evaluated to perform heavy maintenance on the F-35 at its own bases.
Deliveries from Israel's first order for 20 conventional take-off and landing F-35As are expected to start in early 2017, the source said, adding there is also an understanding that the air force will get permission to interface some Israeli-developed systems or equipment following their arrival.
This possibility applies mainly to the aircraft's electronic warfare suite, as previous Israeli requests to equip the type with domestically manufactured equipment were rejected."
And it can't come to soon! |
_________________ Stealth, so the bad guys don't know your there till they start blowing up. Have a nice day!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
thestealthfighterguy
|
Posted: Jan 27, 2012 - 07:02 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Sep 15, 2011 - 02:18 AM
Posts: 254
Location: Your six-O-clock
|
Is it me or am I the only one that thinks the first time the F-35 go's into combat it may well be for Isreal? Just like the F-16 and F-15 I belive.
TSFG |
_________________ Stealth, so the bad guys don't know your there till they start blowing up. Have a nice day!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
neptune
|
Posted: Jan 27, 2012 - 09:37 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Oct 24, 2008 - 01:03 AM
Posts: 1143
Location: Houston
Status: Offline
|
|
thestealthfighterguy wrote:
Is it me or am I the only one that thinks the first time the F-35 go's into combat it may well be for Isreal? Just like the F-16 and F-15 I belive.
TSFG
Each item they have been given (and paid for by their lost loved ones) has been physically modified (usually improving) or used in unconventional tactics that exceed the US systems tests or operational concepts. I too agree, that they will be first to test the war-fighting capabilities of the JSF against whomever is tired of sharpening their swords.....and then, all of our "hot air" will be proved or disproved, in blood. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
thestealthfighterguy
|
Posted: Jan 29, 2012 - 11:16 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Sep 15, 2011 - 02:18 AM
Posts: 254
Location: Your six-O-clock
|
|
neptune wrote:
thestealthfighterguy wrote:
Is it me or am I the only one that thinks the first time the F-35 go's into combat it may well be for Isreal? Just like the F-16 and F-15 I belive.
TSFG
Each item they have been given (and paid for by their lost loved ones) has been physically modified (usually improving) or used in unconventional tactics that exceed the US systems tests or operational concepts. I too agree, that they will be first to test the war-fighting capabilities of the JSF against whomever is tired of sharpening their swords.....and then, all of our "hot air" will be proved or disproved, in blood.
Agreed. Isreal is great at making things work and making specalized weapons for their countrys specal needs. TSFG |
_________________ Stealth, so the bad guys don't know your there till they start blowing up. Have a nice day!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
popcorn
|
Posted: Jan 30, 2012 - 01:13 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Sep 24, 2008 - 09:55 AM
Posts: 2037
Status: Offline
|
|
wrightwing wrote:
archeman wrote:
popcorn - do you have a reference to the statement about neighbors stocking up with increasingly advanced kits? It seems to me that on balance many of Israeli's nearby real threats are not advancing in a way that will interfere with IAF operations substantially. There have been a lot of missile and guerrilla warfare advances uncomfortably close, but a 4thGen aircraft will be just as effective against those as a 5thGen.
If Israel's neighbors get S-300/400, and other double digit SAMs, then a 4th Gen aircraft won't be particularly useful compared to a 5th Gen.
True enough. Also, the neighborhood includes other Arab states like Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Though it may not be likely, one can never discount regime change e.g Iran under the Shah. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|