Forum: General F-16 forum

F-16xl dreamer



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
medicdwpa
PostPosted: Dec 18, 2011 - 04:08 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Oct 26, 2009 - 04:55 AM
Posts: 48
Location: georgia
Status: Offline
Short of new tooling(a given cost and time) all of the test and eval is done on a F-16E/XL. With all the cost over run and delay on the F-35. If the power that be where to say GO. how long would it take to put it from go to IOC? Question
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 25, 2013 - 7:52 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
madrat
PostPosted: Dec 18, 2011 - 05:46 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Mar 03, 2010 - 03:12 AM
Posts: 986

Status: Offline
Longer than simply keeping the F-35 program in step.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
medicdwpa
PostPosted: Dec 18, 2011 - 11:13 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Oct 26, 2009 - 04:55 AM
Posts: 48
Location: georgia
Status: Offline
All 187 the USAF,NAVY AND USMC WILL GET IN 20yr's or so. LMAO
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
tacf-x
PostPosted: Dec 19, 2011 - 01:53 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Sep 17, 2011 - 03:25 AM
Posts: 431
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Status: Offline
Unfortunately bringing back the F-16XL would be more trouble than it's worth. Sure we've done all the tests and evaluations of the F-16XL and all that other good stuff but how long ago was it? You're asking us to reach back into the '80s to grab an airframe design that was worked on by people that are probably old and retired now. We need something that was developed recently and people have recent experience working with.

Don't get me wrong, the F-16XL was awesome and I think it should have won, but its time is gone, let it go.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
geogen
PostPosted: Dec 19, 2011 - 03:53 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Mar 11, 2008 - 03:28 PM
Posts: 2804
Location: 45 km offshore, New England
Status: Offline
It depends on whether or not there is an USAF requirement for a mid-term capability upgrade, in case of a full F-35 suspension. If NASA and DARPA got involved and a fast-track order was given, probably 5 yrs to achieve an increment 7.1 IOT&E completion (FY15 procurement delivering initial operational jets). If it was a purely MIC development program and left up to them though, probably until 2020.

_________________
The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
medicdwpa
PostPosted: Dec 19, 2011 - 01:00 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Oct 26, 2009 - 04:55 AM
Posts: 48
Location: georgia
Status: Offline
Thank you Elite 2k. The point was a little what if. I am quit clear on the age of the people involved and the design( if it make sense it will never happen)! Just wanted to know from people that do R&D and have fast tracked thing, what kind of real world time frame one would be looking at. Two Cents
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic