| Author |
Message |
|
alloycowboy
|
Posted: Dec 16, 2011 - 01:28 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Oct 26, 2010 - 09:28 AM
Posts: 613
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Jun 20, 2013 - 11:10 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
spazsinbad
|
Posted: Dec 16, 2011 - 01:47 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 8044
Location: OZ
|
|
|
|
 |
|
velocityvector
|
Posted: Dec 16, 2011 - 02:22 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Apr 25, 2009 - 05:21 AM
Posts: 171
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline
|
| I s'pose that depends upon one's altitude and attitude at the time buffeting sets in. A technical measure perhaps applicable is 'pucker factor' should deck or terra loom close at hand. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
alloycowboy
|
Posted: Dec 16, 2011 - 03:02 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Oct 26, 2010 - 09:28 AM
Posts: 613
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
|
Speaking of "buffeting", it seems to be a very common problem on most jet fighters with twin vertical tails. In fact NASA was working on the problem on the F-18. See the nine page report:
CONTRIBUTIONS TO ACTIVE BUFFETING ALLEVIATION PROGRAMS BY THE NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20040086836_2004091398.pdf
Just skimming the report, the quick fix for the F-35 might be some thing similar to the McDonnell Douglas designed "Exoskin". |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
quicksilver
|
Posted: Dec 17, 2011 - 09:13 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Feb 16, 2011 - 01:30 AM
Posts: 629
Status: Offline
|
Ask Eagle guys about buffet. Ask old hard wing F-4 guys about buffet. Ask AV-8B pilots about buffet.
Until it becomes dimensional/quantified and compared for reference to other jets, this issue is a red herring. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
spazsinbad
|
Posted: Dec 17, 2011 - 10:19 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 8044
Location: OZ
|
|
|
|
 |
|
quicksilver
|
Posted: Dec 17, 2011 - 10:57 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Feb 16, 2011 - 01:30 AM
Posts: 629
Status: Offline
|
|
spazsinbad wrote:
Ask an A-4 pilot about buffeting when the leading edge slats came out in a turn under G force. Ask about when one came out and one did not.  [A-4 slats were held in place by 'wind' when 'wind' dexreased gravity dropped them down.]
BTDT  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
velocityvector
|
Posted: Dec 19, 2011 - 07:20 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Apr 25, 2009 - 05:21 AM
Posts: 171
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline
|
| Rats. Senator McCain isn't returning my phone calls re the A-4. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
f35phixer
|
Posted: Dec 19, 2011 - 08:05 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: May 13, 2009 - 11:38 PM
Posts: 143
Status: Offline
|
| fixed by fences and other hardware attached to jet USUALLY... We don't wnat that on LO jets. Seen any F-18's lately? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
stereospace
|
Posted: Dec 19, 2011 - 08:39 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Nov 21, 2009 - 05:35 PM
Posts: 652
Location: Columbia, Maryland, USA
Status: Offline
|
|
Quote:
In any previous fighter programme, these issues may not have received such high-level scrutiny. But no other fighter programme has faced the cost of modifying hundreds of production fighters as flight tests reveal new problems over an 11-year period. Even if the changes are relatively minor, the cumulative cost to make the changes could be prohibitive.
I have to agree that it will be along time before the services forget this and it will be an even longer time before they agree to concurrent test and production again. Still, in the early days, it wasn't unusual for an aircraft to go though models A-E before production stabilized and that was over only a few years.
I wonder if you could take a whole new approach though. Maybe categorize testing by design impact. Engine and structure receive full life testing before production begins, since those have the biggest cost impact to fix later. Virtually everything else is easily replaced or modified, so they can be tested and produced concurrently. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|