Forum: Rotary Wing Aircraft

Next Gen Tiltrotor: Valor



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
count_to_10
PostPosted: Apr 19, 2013 - 12:45 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Mar 10, 2012 - 03:38 PM
Posts: 1322

Status: Offline
http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/ ... px?ID=1112

The engine pods are kind of interesting. They don't tilt with the rotors, and don't seem to have the IR signature reducers.

_________________
Einstein got it backward: one cannot prevent a war without preparing for it.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 22, 2013 - 7:25 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
aaam
PostPosted: Apr 27, 2013 - 03:40 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Aug 21, 2010 - 11:52 PM
Posts: 462

Status: Offline
count_to_10 wrote:
http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/blog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=1112

The engine pods are kind of interesting. They don't tilt with the rotors, and don't seem to have the IR signature reducers.


To tilt the engines or not to tilt has always been a close decision. On the V-22 they tilt in order to reduce weight, but it was a close call in the design phase. Earlier in the evolution of what became the V-280, the engines did in fact tilt.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
PhillyGuy
PostPosted: Apr 27, 2013 - 06:10 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Sep 29, 2006 - 04:07 AM
Posts: 547

Status: Offline
Why isn't the V-22 good enough for the Army?

_________________
"Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest."
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
aaam
PostPosted: Apr 29, 2013 - 10:35 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Aug 21, 2010 - 11:52 PM
Posts: 462

Status: Offline
PhillyGuy wrote:
Why isn't the V-22 good enough for the Army?


It's bigger than what they need for this role. Army was originally onboard for the program back in the day, but pulled out for a variety of reasons including, but not limited to, USAF's objections to one of the main roles Army had planned for it. Further discussion would be more appropriate in other topic.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
bjr1028
PostPosted: May 08, 2013 - 07:09 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jul 07, 2009 - 04:34 AM
Posts: 503
Location: Dubuque, IA
Status: Offline
PhillyGuy wrote:
Why isn't the V-22 good enough for the Army?


Too big for utility, too small for heavy lift. Just right for the Marine Corps.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
aaam
PostPosted: May 08, 2013 - 09:49 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Aug 21, 2010 - 11:52 PM
Posts: 462

Status: Offline
bjr1028 wrote:
PhillyGuy wrote:
Why isn't the V-22 good enough for the Army?


Too big for utility, too small for heavy lift. Just right for the Marine Corps.


Regarding heavy lift, interestingly the V-22 can lift a heavier payload than any helo in the West except the CH-47 and CH-53E. Of course, the Russian Mi-6, 10 and2 6 can lift more as well. It also holds the worlds speed record with an external load, demonstrating 10,000 lbs. at 220 knots.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic