| Author |
Message |
|
maus92
|
Posted: Dec 02, 2011 - 05:05 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: May 21, 2010 - 06:50 PM
Posts: 646
Location: Annapolis, MD
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 26, 2012 - 9:24 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
darkvarkguy
|
Posted: Dec 02, 2011 - 06:28 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Mar 05, 2009 - 06:01 AM
Posts: 350
Location: Raleigh, NC
Status: Offline
|
| Well it put up a good fight. Sometimes there's more to it than just building a better engine. |
_________________ FB-111A Pease AFB 82-87
A-10A Suwon AB ROK 87-88
FB-111A/F-111G Pease AFB 88-90
|
|
|
|
 |
|
tacf-x
|
Posted: Dec 02, 2011 - 07:56 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Sep 17, 2011 - 03:25 AM
Posts: 386
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Status: Offline
|
| I honestly am not surprised to see this happen. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
maus92
|
Posted: Dec 02, 2011 - 10:54 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: May 21, 2010 - 06:50 PM
Posts: 646
Location: Annapolis, MD
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
1st503rdsgt
|
Posted: Dec 03, 2011 - 02:30 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jan 23, 2011 - 01:23 AM
Posts: 774
Status: Offline
|
| Meh. No point in investing so much money in what might be a low-volume or canceled project. Better to wait until there's more certainty on the F-35's future. |
_________________ The sky is blue because God loves the Infantry.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
popcorn
|
Posted: Dec 03, 2011 - 02:37 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Sep 24, 2008 - 09:55 AM
Posts: 1179
Status: Offline
|
The DoD and the Armed Services were against it soits all for the best.
The technology will live on and no doubt be reincarnated in some other engine design down the road. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
memzey
|
Posted: Dec 03, 2011 - 12:53 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Oct 04, 2010 - 01:10 PM
Posts: 39
Location: St. Albans (UK)
Status: Offline
|
| Would it feasible for an F-35 partner nation to purchase the IP and pick up the funding for the F136 for installation on their own platforms? That would give them their own engine option for the JSF and possibly an engine to install on a domestic fighter somewhere down the road? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
southernphantom
|
Posted: Dec 03, 2011 - 03:36 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Aug 06, 2011 - 06:18 PM
Posts: 524
Location: Somewhere in Dixie
Status: Offline
|
|
memzey wrote:
Would it feasible for an F-35 partner nation to purchase the IP and pick up the funding for the F136 for installation on their own platforms? That would give them their own engine option for the JSF and possibly an engine to install on a domestic fighter somewhere down the road?
That would all depend on the cost of the IP (either paltry or astronomical, it's probably one extreme) and the industrial base of the country in question. I could see it as useful for Japan or Korea, as they're some of the only potential JSF customers with the will to build and design their own fighters. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sferrin
|
Posted: Dec 03, 2011 - 05:19 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 22, 2005 - 04:23 AM
Posts: 1470
Status: Offline
|
|
memzey wrote:
Would it feasible for an F-35 partner nation to purchase the IP and pick up the funding for the F136 for installation on their own platforms?
That would be assuming the US gov would sell the IP (it's their's afterall, not GE's) which I'd expect to happen shortly after hell froze over and the devil had learned to ice skate. |
_________________ "There I was. . ."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Beazz
|
Posted: Dec 03, 2011 - 05:22 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Sep 15, 2007 - 08:19 PM
Posts: 460
Status: Offline
|
|
southernphantom wrote:
memzey wrote:
Would it feasible for an F-35 partner nation to purchase the IP and pick up the funding for the F136 for installation on their own platforms? That would give them their own engine option for the JSF and possibly an engine to install on a domestic fighter somewhere down the road?
That would all depend on the cost of the IP (either paltry or astronomical, it's probably one extreme) and the industrial base of the country in question. I could see it as useful for Japan or Korea, as they're some of the only potential JSF customers with the will to build and design their own fighters.
How would the US allow some other nation to just build this super engine? It appears it is goin to be a great engine but did not the US fund this entire fiasco and therefore own all the technology that is in it as of now. GE and Rolls Royce did not put up the cash to do this and do not own it as I see it? No one ever said it was not going ot be a great engine. But the US military funded it up till now so how can they just take it and run with it like it was theirs? It is NOT their engine seein how the US tax payer paid for it up till now. If it is stopped does not the US military own the rights to it for when and if they see fit to develope it in the future? Just curious.
Bazz |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
memzey
|
Posted: Dec 03, 2011 - 08:13 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Oct 04, 2010 - 01:10 PM
Posts: 39
Location: St. Albans (UK)
Status: Offline
|
| I had assumed it would be the US government selling the IP but ultimately who the vendor is makes little difference as it would still require congressional approval. I also think this will/could be a great engine (not to say the F135 is not also a great engine - it is) and I'd like to see it in the air. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
discofishing
|
Posted: Dec 03, 2011 - 09:32 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Nov 07, 2008 - 10:15 PM
Posts: 1145
Status: Offline
|
| How long was the F-16 in production until an alternative engine was offered? Maybe the F136 could be revived later down the road with non taxpayer dollars. There's also a next generation bomber in the works, right? Maybe the F136 could power it. What about the F136 as a new engine for the B-52 and/or B-1B? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
southernphantom
|
Posted: Dec 04, 2011 - 12:27 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Aug 06, 2011 - 06:18 PM
Posts: 524
Location: Somewhere in Dixie
Status: Offline
|
|
discofishing wrote:
How long was the F-16 in production until an alternative engine was offered? Maybe the F136 could be revived later down the road with non taxpayer dollars. There's also a next generation bomber in the works, right? Maybe the F136 could power it. What about the F136 as a new engine for the B-52 and/or B-1B?
Well, I would have to say a 4-engine 'Megafortress' might be possible with the size of the F-136. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
madrat
|
Posted: Dec 04, 2011 - 03:17 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Mar 03, 2010 - 03:12 AM
Posts: 739
Status: Offline
|
| Why wouldn't F135 work for the 'Megafortress' if the F136 would? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
delvo
|
Posted: Dec 04, 2011 - 03:35 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Aug 15, 2011 - 05:06 AM
Posts: 219
Status: Offline
|
| Any engine that was meant for F-35 won't be used for B-1 or the next new bomber even if they do ever get around to creating another new bomber again at all. They would make supercruising a requirement and not care so much about strength in a lower speed range, which is what F-35 goes for instead. So if GE wanted to make a new B-1 or new-bomber engine, they'd either start with a whole new one or use the one from YF-22 & YF-23 as their starting point. For that matter, the B-1R proposal already specified years ago that it would have used that engine's counterpart, which is flying F-22s right now. (It would just have four instead of two.) At least one engine that had been designed for F-35 was available, but for that plane, they didn't want it and chose a supercruiser instead. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|