Forum: F-35 Lightning II

F-35C and Airfoil/Control Surface Drag



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
pilotbrah
PostPosted: Nov 06, 2011 - 11:34 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Nov 06, 2011 - 11:22 PM
Posts: 11

Status: Offline
The F-35C has been slated as being potentially slower in terms of acceleration and top speed due to enlarged wings and control surfaces (in addition to the extra weight).

Although induced drag from the wings will most likely be greater, the greater wing area also introduces the hypothesis of a possible lower AoA at similar speeds. Therefore, the possibility of a reduced attack and drag on the big ol' fuselage is introduced.

What I'd like to do with this topic is start a discussion based on what the F-16.net community thinks about the assumption that the fuselage will not be as efficient at generating lift as compared to the increased wing area, thus actually reducing drag on the CV.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 26, 2012 - 9:10 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
alloycowboy
PostPosted: Nov 07, 2011 - 06:07 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Oct 26, 2010 - 09:28 AM
Posts: 467
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Extra wing length is always more efficient at creating lift with less drag then a fuselage lifting body design. But you have a place to put the engines, fuel, weapons, avionics, pilot, ect, ect, ect. You could just attach the wings and tail to a stream lined body like the Bell-X1 but what if you could get the streamlined body to produce lift as well and combined them with a set of wings? Hmmm, what would that look like? But don't forget you have to still be able to dog fight in it!







 View user's profile Send private message  
 
sprstdlyscottsmn
PostPosted: Nov 07, 2011 - 06:13 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Mar 10, 2006 - 01:24 AM
Posts: 1111

Status: Offline
well, when compared to the A-B, the C has more wetted area so it will have more skin surface drag. It's wing loading will be much lower and as such so will it's lift coefficient and induced drag coefficient. This will help in the low speed realm (help offset the weight disadvantage that is) but will not help at all in the high speed and may significantly hinder trans/supersonic operations.

_________________
James,

-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic (WTF?)
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
alloycowboy
PostPosted: Nov 07, 2011 - 11:29 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Oct 26, 2010 - 09:28 AM
Posts: 467
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
@pilotbrah..... Another thing you need to consider is that air around an airplane happens in three dimensions. So as you can probably guess most of the fourth generation jet fighters never under went computation fluid dynamic modeling or if they did it was very rudementry as most of them were designed in the era when the first pocket calculators were coming out in the early 1970's. It was only personal computers came cheap and powerful that real computation fluid dynamic anlysis could be considered in the design of an airplane. Here is a computer model of an F-18 under going Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis. If you have any questions on CFD you can ask "sprstdlyscottsmn" as he is an expert on it. Wink


 View user's profile Send private message  
 
spazsinbad
PostPosted: Nov 07, 2011 - 11:52 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 4615
Location: OZ
There is info on the web about F-35 & CFD FWIW.

_________________
http://www.adf-history.com/adf/?cat=7 http://alturl.com/4a4ko http://www.youtube.com/user/bengello/videos
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2012 F-16.net