Forum: Future F-16 crew

ROTC Scholarships and Drug Use



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   1, 2  Next
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
joseph223
PostPosted: Oct 31, 2011 - 04:59 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Oct 18, 2011 - 02:44 PM
Posts: 17

Status: Offline
Does it disqualify candidates? If there is or isn't any legal history? What about diff. types of drugs, such as marijuana, cocaine, heroin, alcohol, ecstasy, etc...? Or considering consistency of use, i.e., once or twice vs. regularly?

I've heard many conflicting stories about consequences (or lack thereof); all sorts of things about white lies or honesty-points, etc., etc.

For those that do not disqualify (if any), what are the waivers and paperwork like? Is it a big pain or disadvantage?

Thanks!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 21, 2013 - 7:41 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
discofishing
PostPosted: Oct 31, 2011 - 05:43 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Nov 07, 2008 - 10:15 PM
Posts: 1280

Status: Offline
Dude, if it isn't in a police record, lie about it. If you smoked weed, just tell them you never did it. Lie as long as there is no record to prove otherwise. Now if you lie and they find something written down somewhere, then you're screwed. There's a risk. I'm sure there's plenty of F-16 pilots out there that smoked pot before they joined up.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
joseph223
PostPosted: Oct 31, 2011 - 03:29 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Oct 18, 2011 - 02:44 PM
Posts: 17

Status: Offline
And if it was only a once or twice experimentation thing? I dunno, it seems like a bad idea to lie about something so simple and understandable. I could imagine it in a future application of Murphy's law, with it popping up somehow, whether by polygraph or interview or whatever, ruining everyone's day. I would think it as a silly thing to screw up a career over if it's deemed to be a lie. Some have told me that experimentation is perfectly fine, whilst others have told me that even once may lead to a DQ.


Is it really not worth the (possible) waivers and whatnot to get rid of this silly issue? If any risks are to be taken, I'd rather them be over something less trivial and less crucial; preferably not risks that could end almost everything.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Roscoe
PostPosted: Nov 01, 2011 - 04:44 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jun 29, 2004 - 09:14 PM
Posts: 1279
Location: Las Vegas
Status: Offline
My step-nephew was an honor student applying to the Naval nuclear program. In the interview he disregarded the same advice given above and was dumped from the program. Don't admit to anything for which there is no proof.

_________________
Roscoe

<b>"It's time to get medieval, I'm goin' in for guns"</b> - <i>Dos Gringos</i>
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
discofishing
PostPosted: Nov 01, 2011 - 08:27 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Nov 07, 2008 - 10:15 PM
Posts: 1280

Status: Offline
Said person should SHOULD absolutely lie about smoking pot. End of story. Now if said person was a coke-head or shot up heroine, then I would ask they find another career. The military does not exist to fix mommy-daddy issues and fucked up childhoods. They have shrinks and support groups for that. If said person has a police record, they're on their own.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
joseph223
PostPosted: Nov 01, 2011 - 07:28 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Oct 18, 2011 - 02:44 PM
Posts: 17

Status: Offline
What if an old friend lets it out during a clearance check? Would that be something of interest during one of those interviews? I've been told that the primary interest behind these checks is related to deception and trust, so I'd still be extremely hesitant. Thanks for your time, guys.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
launcherman
PostPosted: Nov 01, 2011 - 08:14 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Apr 27, 2011 - 10:45 AM
Posts: 79
Location: Seymour Johnson AFB, NC
Status: Offline
Realize that if you follow some of the advice above, I'd make a list of everyone you smoked with and never use them for a reference on a security clearance questionaire.

_________________
2W1X1
357 TFTS 90-92
8MS 93-94
4EMS 94-97
372TRS 97-01
48EMS 01-04
21A
33MXS 05-06
58AMU 06-07
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Meteor
PostPosted: Nov 01, 2011 - 09:06 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: May 14, 2007 - 08:46 PM
Posts: 168

Status: Offline
If there is any government record anywhere about your drug use, you need to go apply for a job elsewhere.

If you are still or have recently been using drugs, then you need to go apply for a job elsewhere.

If some very hot chick on your high school summer vacation got naked and offered you herself and some weed and you took her up on both, lie and apply.

If the USAF seriously decided to prohibit anyone that had ever inhaled even once from joining up, there would be a serious lack of people in the Air Force right now.

_________________
F-4C/D, F-16A/B/C/D, 727, DC-10, MD-80
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
kori
PostPosted: Nov 02, 2011 - 01:37 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Mar 28, 2010 - 07:14 AM
Posts: 112
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
joseph223 wrote:
What if an old friend lets it out during a clearance check? Would that be something of interest during one of those interviews? I've been told that the primary interest behind these checks is related to deception and trust, so I'd still be extremely hesitant. Thanks for your time, guys.


If it comes up, say you lied about it to look cool to your friends. Not the most honorable of excuses, but how bad do you want whatever your after?

_________________
I'm safer up here, then you are down there.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Roscoe
PostPosted: Nov 02, 2011 - 03:06 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jun 29, 2004 - 09:14 PM
Posts: 1279
Location: Las Vegas
Status: Offline
launcherman wrote:
Realize that if you follow some of the advice above, I'd make a list of everyone you smoked with and never use them for a reference on a security clearance questionaire.


Problem is that investigators ask your references for another reference and you can't control that. So only give family and church friends Smile

_________________
Roscoe

<b>"It's time to get medieval, I'm goin' in for guns"</b> - <i>Dos Gringos</i>
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
expedite
PostPosted: Nov 02, 2011 - 08:05 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Oct 18, 2011 - 02:36 AM
Posts: 22

Status: Offline
...


Last edited by expedite on Nov 04, 2011 - 02:42 AM; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
guardbaby
PostPosted: Nov 03, 2011 - 12:29 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Nov 15, 2007 - 02:41 PM
Posts: 85

Status: Offline
Expedite, since you just admitted it to the whole of F-16.net...what should be your next move? Bang Head
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
expedite
PostPosted: Nov 03, 2011 - 04:21 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Oct 18, 2011 - 02:36 AM
Posts: 22

Status: Offline
...


Last edited by expedite on Nov 04, 2011 - 02:45 AM; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
joseph223
PostPosted: Nov 03, 2011 - 04:56 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Oct 18, 2011 - 02:44 PM
Posts: 17

Status: Offline
I'm still not completely sure why one in such a situation would be better off lying in the first place, aside from supposed examples such as Roscoe's. To challenge that, are many people that hold administrative positions in the military really so prohibitive as to bar new faces from certain programs at the hint of experimentation? I'd think one could be able to call up the people personally and explain it, and perhaps even garner a net gain of respect for the whole honesty ordeal. Most sources (outside of this website) have recommended the truth in such a situation, including ROTC instructors and recruiters. I think the problem is that both sides have a plausible amount of merit; neither has really sold the deal yet, though.

So far, what I've researched from apologists of either case:

Truth
--------
Honesty is appreciated
Not a big deal
"Morally" correct
Military doesn't want perfect people for TS clearances, they want trustworthy people, etc.
Experimentation is within limits for disqualification (?)

Lie
--------
No proof? Never happened.
Hearsay = inconsequential
Possibly save effort, possible misc. benefits
Some sources state even once warrants DQ (?)


Still looking for more opinions for research.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
discofishing
PostPosted: Nov 03, 2011 - 05:35 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Nov 07, 2008 - 10:15 PM
Posts: 1280

Status: Offline
You're taking a perspective as someone who has NOT served and has NOT held a security clearance and has NOT seen the horrors of combat. If you lie about maybe smoking a little weed, you're doing it to put yourself in HARM'S way for your COUNTRY. Lying will ensure that you wake up on a freezing cold mountain top after two hours of sleep. Lying will put you in a position where you eat a lower quality of food that what is found in prisons and jails. Lying will allow you to jump out of airplanes at night when it's it's 36 degrees outside. Lying will put you in a position wear you're paid disproportionately low compared to a civilian counterpart. Tell the truth and you'll probably be warm, cozy, and well fed, regretting it 40 years down the road.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic