F-16 Reference
5th Gen Fighters
|
| Author |
Message |
|
shaggygomer
|
 Posted: Dec 12, 2011 - 12:29 AM
|
 
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Dec 11, 2011 - 08:30 PM
Posts: 1
Status: Offline
|
For what it's worth, I was the 64th commander who initiated the two new Nellis F-16 paint schemes as part of the iron swap that netted the Block 25s from Duluth last year (when our Block 42s split to the various winds). My DO and I considered numerous new paint schemes and settled on painting a couple jets in the Arctic scheme (since there is snow on the Nevada ranges for 8-9 months out of the year) and a couple in a distinctly new style. Based on his recommendation after reviewing hundreds of paint schemes worldwide, I forwarded the "Blizzard" scheme up the AF chain for approval. It was approved at the HAF about a year ago, and then took another 8 months for all the hoops to be jumped through, etc. As always, a priority for Aggressor paint schemes is to make them distinct enough to be instantly recognizable at a merge as non-friendlies, enhancing realism for Blue air-to-air training. (The 64th may be gaining more iron when the 65th is decommissioned as an Aggressor squadron, so you may see more of the newer paint schemes over time.)
Na Zdorovye! |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: May 26, 2012 - 8:48 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
EOR
|
|
Posted: Mar 06, 2012 - 06:01 AM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: May 19, 2008 - 05:52 PM
Posts: 105
Location: las vegas, nevada
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boman
|
|
Posted: Mar 06, 2012 - 07:51 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Jul 08, 2004 - 08:22 PM
Posts: 1040
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Private Messages
Forum Guidelines
