Forum: General F-22A Raptor forum

F-22 vs SU-35



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   Previous  1, 2, 3
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Poll
F-22 vs SU-35
SU-35
9%
 9%  [ 2 ]
F-22
90%
 90%  [ 19 ]
Total Votes : 21


Author Message
airmaster11
PostPosted: Oct 13, 2011 - 06:58 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Aug 30, 2011 - 04:27 PM
Posts: 10
Location: Hyderabad India
Status: Offline
The f-22 is a clear in terms of speed , range and technology but on the other side it is expensive and hard to maintain.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 24, 2013 - 3:57 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
falcon17
PostPosted: Oct 13, 2011 - 08:42 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Sep 01, 2011 - 05:00 AM
Posts: 74
Location: Orlando
Status: Offline
airmaster11 wrote:
The f-22 is a clear in terms of speed , range and technology but on the other side it is expensive and hard to maintain.


Couldnt agree more with you there. The F-22 does about 1,550 mph and the SU-35 is said to do 1,450 mph. Also IMHO in battle I want a plane like the SU-35 because it's more then potent if facing a country like Iran or even china and it has a pretty decent turn around time. But for deep interdiction missions I want an F-22.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
wrightwing
PostPosted: Oct 13, 2011 - 09:12 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Oct 23, 2008 - 04:22 PM
Posts: 2025

Status: Offline
falcon17 wrote:
airmaster11 wrote:
The f-22 is a clear in terms of speed , range and technology but on the other side it is expensive and hard to maintain.


Couldnt agree more with you there. The F-22 does about 1,550 mph and the SU-35 is said to do 1,450 mph. Also IMHO in battle I want a plane like the SU-35 because it's more then potent if facing a country like Iran or even china and it has a pretty decent turn around time. But for deep interdiction missions I want an F-22.


Neither of those speed figures are tactically significant, as they wouldn't be of use in combat. The F-22's supercruise speed/range however would be a significant advantage. As far as sortie rates- F-22s have demonstrated high sortie rates, so I'm not really sure what sort of advantages an Su-35 would have here.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
falcon17
PostPosted: Oct 13, 2011 - 09:13 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Sep 01, 2011 - 05:00 AM
Posts: 74
Location: Orlando
Status: Offline
geogen wrote:
Hi falcon,

I confess I didn't vote on your survey as I usually refrain from such 'who would win' surveys, etc., but it will always provoke an interesting convo nonetheless.

As far as the 'cost' of a future operational Su-35S goes, nobody really knows yet. The 'cheap' prices you might be referring to can pretty much be nullified as older estimates from years back, perhaps similar to how former F-35 estimates were being advertised as being cheap. The Su-35S however should actually come in pretty expensive in relative terms - both as an acquisition cost and especially per Life cycle costs - once it's finally mature after completing operational evaluation tests and ready for mass production.

No doubt this bird should be awesome and a major threat to whomever it is intending to intimidate, but it will most likely be a monster to maintain and operate too. Those engines will be sucking serious fuel and the overall complexity of this 'heavy' aircraft system will surely require comprehensive and broad scale maintenance.

Other than that, it looks capable to be a truly dominating next-gen platform all around, systems wise and performance. With respect to 'how it can turn vs an F-22', I'd agree with you that it would likely win in an hypothetical 'Red Flag 2015' gun fight vs an F-22... at least in low to medium altitude. It has demonstrated what it is capable of performing and very few aircraft would seem to be able to match it in extreme cases of ACM. So basically, yes, the Su-35 would seem to out-turn even an F-22 at least in low altitude but then again, an F-15C with a centerline tank appears to out-turn an F-22 as well (by about 2 seconds for a low-altitude minimum radius turn)... at least according to what video on the internet displays. my 2 cents for u.



I never expected you to vote my friend. Also as what I've said before to a few people who commented on this thread "whats perfect to you is useless to me". I like the raptor yes but I don't think it's the best plane in the world. Every country has an idea of what the best plane in the world is For a country like India and Russia the SU-35 is the best aircraft in the world because it can handle class B runways. Also thanks for voicing your opinion Smile.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
falcon17
PostPosted: Oct 13, 2011 - 11:17 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Sep 01, 2011 - 05:00 AM
Posts: 74
Location: Orlando
Status: Offline
wrightwing wrote:
falcon17 wrote:
airmaster11 wrote:
The f-22 is a clear in terms of speed , range and technology but on the other side it is expensive and hard to maintain.


Couldnt agree more with you there. The F-22 does about 1,550 mph and the SU-35 is said to do 1,450 mph. Also IMHO in battle I want a plane like the SU-35 because it's more then potent if facing a country like Iran or even china and it has a pretty decent turn around time. But for deep interdiction missions I want an F-22.


Neither of those speed figures are tactically significant, as they wouldn't be of use in combat. The F-22's supercruise speed/range however would be a significant advantage. As far as sortie rates- F-22s have demonstrated high sortie rates, so I'm not really sure what sort of advantages an Su-35 would have here.


Like the F-22 the SU-35S can supercruise. And it's still in it's teething phase to. I have high hopes for the sukhoi because the SU-27 was and still is quite an impressive machine. And I understand that the speed factors aren't tactically useful as well. And what in my opinion is an advantage of the SU-35 is it's rough field capability and it's IRST.


Last edited by falcon17 on Oct 14, 2011 - 04:39 AM; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
1st503rdsgt
PostPosted: Oct 14, 2011 - 02:26 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Banned


Joined: Jan 23, 2011 - 01:23 AM
Posts: 1549

Status: Offline
Boring... a$$... fanboy-thread.

_________________
The sky is blue because God loves the Infantry.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
falcon17
PostPosted: Oct 14, 2011 - 04:35 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Sep 01, 2011 - 05:00 AM
Posts: 74
Location: Orlando
Status: Offline
1st503rdsgt wrote:
Boring... a$$... fanboy-thread.


Boring thread I agree. Fanboy I disagree. I like both aircraft but I'm not going to get all upset like a fanboy if someone disagrees with me.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic