Forum: F-16 News

Is this the longest combat sortie in history?



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1, 2
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
ygbsm
PostPosted: Sep 04, 2011 - 02:24 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: May 31, 2010 - 08:15 AM
Posts: 55

Status: Offline
Code3 wrote:
reddawg2583 wrote:
I find myself entertained that he is so annoyed at having to brake ride back into the PAS (without being asked!). Cry me a river... Admittedly that had to have been an uncomfortably loooooong flight, but the jobs not done till it's done.


Seriously? The job was done...riding brakes need not be done by the pilot, in fact it is most often done by maintainers.

Unless you've flown similar missions, I would say your opinion is mostly irrelevant. It seems much more logical to have the maintainer ride the brakes in this case than the pilot who hasn't been able to move for 13.5 hours. Heaven forbid someone has to climb up a ladder and sit in a seat for two minutes so a guy who's just logged the longest Viper mission in history can take a load off.


Somehow we have lost perspective on the roles of pilots (aircrew) and maintainers in all being "airmen". These pilots have hung it out there for an exorbitantly long period of time, with a brain drain that would challenge some of the best in figuring out ROE, fuels, station time, etc. Not to mention taking on enemy fire. I don't think the flightline realizes what pilots (aircrew) do anymore.

This may be part of the continuing evolution of our roles, but why do you think pilots make sure crewchief/flightline is taken care of? I can't imagine any flightline airmen waiting in the hot sun for hours on end, so why should the flightline think operators can withstand riding the brakes after such a long sortie?

We have to take care of each other as airmen, but we must realize what roles we are playing.

Here's your jet back chief!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 23, 2013 - 5:12 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
discofishing
PostPosted: Sep 04, 2011 - 09:50 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Nov 07, 2008 - 10:15 PM
Posts: 1280

Status: Offline
I still think the regular F-16XL looks better than the above impression with the planform wings. Now if the CFTs were part of the overall F-16XL proposal back when it was competing with the Strike Eagle, then things might be different.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
lb
PostPosted: Sep 20, 2011 - 01:20 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Feb 02, 2010 - 04:30 AM
Posts: 241
Location: USA
Status: Offline
While you can get up and move around in a bomber the B-36 could fly up to 40 hours and I believe the longest B-52 mission was 45 hours. SR-71 missions to the Mideast from CONUS were over 11 hours but the longest single engine flights are probably in the U-2 which can hit 14 hours. Hats off for 13 hours in a Viper.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
SpudmanWP
PostPosted: Sep 20, 2011 - 08:05 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4273
Location: California
Status: Offline
The F-16XL would have still burned the same (if not more) amount of fuel, just not had to do as many pit stops.

_________________
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic