| Author |
Message |
|
b52hvet
|
 Posted: Jun 17, 2012 - 09:44 AM
|
 
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Jun 17, 2012 - 09:36 AM
Posts: 2
Location: Los Osos, CA
Status: Offline
|
Hello folks,
I'm new to the world of 16s, spent all my time in the Air Force working on the B-52H. Last year I was out near Palmdale when I caught sight of the F-16 in the photos [Link pending approval] I've been really trying to figure out what the history of this particular jet is. Any help would be greatly appreciated, and might end quite a bit of head scratching & speculation on my part.
Of particular interest to me is the heavily modified [Link pending approval] pretty cool, just not sure what the story is for it. Also, there are missing control surfaces on the rear of the wing, but with them gone, it certainly makes the wing look smaller than I remember them being.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: May 23, 2013 - 4:47 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
cywolf32
|
|
Posted: Jun 17, 2012 - 10:48 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Nov 21, 2005 - 12:04 PM
Posts: 615
Location: USA
Status: Offline
|
| Divertless supersonic inlet.. Google it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TJStoney
|
|
Posted: Jun 17, 2012 - 11:59 AM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Feb 25, 2005 - 08:30 AM
Posts: 131
Status: Offline
|
| F-35 intake that might be 83-1120 they put it on it a long time ago. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asif
|
|
Posted: Jun 17, 2012 - 12:26 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor
Joined: Aug 23, 2003 - 01:02 PM
Posts: 2799
|
 USAF F-16C block 25 (#83-1120) modified with a diverterless supersonic inlet, or DSI, developed for the Joint Strike Fighter program. |
_________________
Asif Shamim
F-16.net Editorial staff & Patch Gallery Administration
|
|
|
|
|
|
1machinist
|
|
Posted: Jun 17, 2012 - 02:41 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 02, 2007 - 02:31 AM
Posts: 23
Status: Offline
|
It has the small early block stabs though and the later vertical fin base.
An odd mix of parts..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TJStoney
|
|
Posted: Jun 17, 2012 - 05:18 PM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Feb 25, 2005 - 08:30 AM
Posts: 131
Status: Offline
|
| It was a Edwards jet and was modified. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b52hvet
|
|
Posted: Jun 18, 2012 - 03:51 AM
|
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Jun 17, 2012 - 09:36 AM
Posts: 2
Location: Los Osos, CA
Status: Offline
|
| Thanks for the info, all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VarkVet
|
|
Posted: Jun 22, 2012 - 08:15 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Oct 30, 2006 - 04:31 AM
Posts: 1442
Status: Offline
|
|
TJStoney wrote:
F-35 intake that might be 83-1120 they put it on it a long time ago.
It's not 1120 ... must be varkvet week as all my jets are being featured in these recent posts?
My bitches are bad? |
_________________
My eyes have seen the glory of the Lord and the esthetics of the Flightline
|
|
|
|
|
|
LinkF16SimDude
|
|
Posted: Jun 22, 2012 - 09:10 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K
Joined: Jan 31, 2004 - 07:18 PM
Posts: 2365
Status: Offline
|
My  is that's it's a static airframe mock-up for the aforementioned new inlet. Perhaps used for full-scale WT testing. I have, on occasion, been known to be wrong, tho.  |
_________________
Why does "monosyllabic" have 5 syllables?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Private Messages
Forum Guidelines
