| Author |
Message |
|
Gums
|
Posted: Jan 21, 2012 - 11:27 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Dec 16, 2003 - 05:26 PM
Posts: 1243
Status: Offline
|
Salute!
I can't find a good dimensional diagram of the A-7D hook distance, but it looks like about the same distance as the A-4 from mains to hook shoe.
Our hook was the same as the Navy version, and not the spring-looking thing depicted above for the "A" model. We also retained the wing fold and such from the Navy design.
WRT to the donuts..... Seems to me that the donuts cause the wire to bounce back up quickly after the mains pass over. The ones depicted for the boats would seem to allow the wire to slide forward and may not get back up high enough for a short hook to engage. But what do I know? Only had one skip outta three attempts, and was below flying speed.
When I get the next tour at Eglin, I'll get better pics and talk about it with the pilots and crew chiefs. We should be flying within the next month, according to the Wing king and others there yesterday.
Gums sends... |
_________________ Gums
Viper pilot '79
"God in your guts, good men at your back, wings that stay on - and Tally Ho!"
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 26, 2012 - 11:09 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
spazsinbad
|
Posted: Jan 21, 2012 - 11:36 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 4616
Location: OZ
|
Gums, Thanks. As the thread here suggests [http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-15767-start-120.html] the arresting systems are chaotic [http://elementsofpower.blogspot.com/2012/01/f-35-tailhook-risks-meh.html] (and different as you suggest).
What the F-35C hook redesign will do (which will then more closely resemble the F-35A hook and the A-4 hook) is enhance that ashore 'rubber grommet held up' arrestor wire catching and also the 'land based test onboard current USN flight deck gear system' at NAS Lakehurst. It will take the test results to show one way or tuther. I just don't leap to silly conclusions ala elp/Goon et al. |
_________________ http://www.adf-history.com/adf/?cat=7 http://alturl.com/4a4ko http://www.youtube.com/user/bengello/videos
|
|
|
|
 |
|
spazsinbad
|
Posted: Jan 22, 2012 - 05:29 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 4616
Location: OZ
|
|
|
|
 |
|
navy_airframer
|
Posted: Jan 22, 2012 - 09:00 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Nov 14, 2011 - 12:41 AM
Posts: 46
Status: Offline
|
The reprofiled F-35 hook point looks alot more like the SH point then the one that failed the wire engagment tests.
The Growler is one of my squadron jets too. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
spazsinbad
|
Posted: Jan 23, 2012 - 12:36 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 4616
Location: OZ
|
|
|
|
 |
|
alloycowboy
|
Posted: Jan 23, 2012 - 08:57 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Oct 26, 2010 - 09:28 AM
Posts: 467
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
|
@Spazsinbad..... I wonder if some one bothered to figure what the minimum radius they can get away on the front of the hook. One would think the less radius the better as you get more a spatula effect.
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
spazsinbad
|
Posted: Jan 23, 2012 - 09:12 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 4616
Location: OZ
|
|
|
|
 |
|
spazsinbad
|
Posted: Jan 23, 2012 - 09:58 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 4616
Location: OZ
|
|
|
|
 |
|
spazsinbad
|
Posted: Jan 23, 2012 - 01:02 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 4616
Location: OZ
|
|
|
|
 |
|
spazsinbad
|
Posted: Jan 24, 2012 - 08:20 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 4616
Location: OZ
|
|
|
|
 |
|
spazsinbad
|
Posted: Jan 24, 2012 - 08:41 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 4616
Location: OZ
|
|
|
|
 |
|
popcorn
|
Posted: Jan 24, 2012 - 10:42 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Sep 24, 2008 - 09:55 AM
Posts: 1179
Status: Offline
|
|
spazsinbad wrote:
n
Spaz, is there anything to preclude use of grommets aboard ship? They would seem to do a good job of elevating the cable off the deck. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
spazsinbad
|
Posted: Jan 24, 2012 - 10:56 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 4616
Location: OZ
|
IMHO the wire supports do a great job. Any deck hardware must be just that - hardwearing. The rubber grommets are for sometime use in the nevernever. There just in case. I don't know how long these rubber thingies would last but I guess they are replaced every now and then. I guess we need to see a slomo grommet arrest ashore to see what happens to them.
Grommet is an Oz Surfer Slang term for a newbie. Especially an annoying one that gets in the way of real surfers.
____________
Another issue for friendliness onboard is that the wire supports go flat as do the wires when otherwise not in use. It really is no fun to be around the wires when they are UP! |
_________________ http://www.adf-history.com/adf/?cat=7 http://alturl.com/4a4ko http://www.youtube.com/user/bengello/videos
|
|
|
|
 |
|
popcorn
|
Posted: Jan 24, 2012 - 03:57 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Sep 24, 2008 - 09:55 AM
Posts: 1179
Status: Offline
|
|
spazsinbad wrote:
IMHO the wire supports do a great job. Any deck hardware must be just that - hardwearing. The rubber grommets are for sometime use in the nevernever. There just in case. I don't know how long these rubber thingies would last but I guess they are replaced every now and then. I guess we need to see a slomo grommet arrest ashore to see what happens to them.
Grommet is an Oz Surfer Slang term for a newbie. Especially an annoying one that gets in the way of real surfers.
____________
Another issue for friendliness onboard is that the wire supports go flat as do the wires when otherwise not in use. It really is no fun to be around the wires when they are UP!
Yup, those rubber rings would probably get shredded in no time in a carrier environment. Threading cable thru replacement rubber donuts won't be any fun either. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
spazsinbad
|
Posted: Jan 24, 2012 - 03:59 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 4616
Location: OZ
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|