| Author |
Message |
|
stereospace
|
Posted: Feb 16, 2011 - 09:53 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Nov 21, 2009 - 05:35 PM
Posts: 525
Location: Columbia, Maryland, USA
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 26, 2012 - 5:46 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
stereospace
|
Posted: Feb 16, 2011 - 09:58 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Nov 21, 2009 - 05:35 PM
Posts: 525
Location: Columbia, Maryland, USA
Status: Offline
|
| BTW, how do Navy pilots manage to land on runways that aren't moving away from them? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
neptune
|
Posted: Feb 16, 2011 - 10:28 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Oct 24, 2008 - 01:03 AM
Posts: 685
Location: 77007
Status: Offline
|
|
stereospace wrote:
BTW, how do Navy pilots manage to land on runways that aren't moving away from them?
The last Navy Pilot retired in Jan, 1981. Naval Aviators land on runways quite well, Thank You. Both Whiting and Kingsville are still landlocked.  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
aaam
|
Posted: Feb 17, 2011 - 12:08 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Aug 21, 2010 - 11:52 PM
Posts: 422
Status: Offline
|
|
stereospace wrote:
BTW, how do Navy pilots manage to land on runways that aren't moving away from them?
How do Air Force pilots land on airfields that don't have a golf course or O Club?  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
stereospace
|
Posted: Feb 17, 2011 - 12:17 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Nov 21, 2009 - 05:35 PM
Posts: 525
Location: Columbia, Maryland, USA
Status: Offline
|
|
aaam wrote:
How do Air Force pilots land on airfields that don't have a golf course or O Club?
If they have any self respect, they don't.  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
bjr1028
|
Posted: Feb 17, 2011 - 06:12 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Jul 07, 2009 - 04:34 AM
Posts: 490
Location: Dubuque, IA
Status: Offline
|
|
stereospace wrote:
BTW, how do Navy pilots manage to land on runways that aren't moving away from them?
Usually by either pretending they're a carrier in calm seas or pretending they're in the Air Force and get to take things easy. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
spazsinbad
|
Posted: Feb 17, 2011 - 06:27 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 4615
Location: OZ
|
In reality if a USN aircraft is landing ashore at an airfield with an IFLOLS or FLOLS ('mirror') that device will be used to further practice a field carrier landing (whereas a sortie of many such landings is called FCLP - Field Carrier Landing Practice). If no 'mirror'/FLOLS/IFLOLS or even a MOVLAS the USN pilot will fake it as pointed out above. Fresnel Lens Optical Landing System or Improved FLOLS or OLS Optical Landing System are wot those funny things mean...  |
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
182.61 KB |
| Viewed: |
2713 Time(s) |

|
_________________ http://www.adf-history.com/adf/?cat=7 http://alturl.com/4a4ko http://www.youtube.com/user/bengello/videos
|
|
|
|
 |
|
neptune
|
Posted: Feb 17, 2011 - 08:33 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Oct 24, 2008 - 01:03 AM
Posts: 685
Location: 77007
Status: Offline
|
|
stereospace wrote:
BTW, how do Navy pilots manage to land on runways that aren't moving away from them?
I forgot to add, Navy jets also have fairly new, slightly used brakes in addition to the proven, well used tailhook. Those thingies at the top of the pedals.  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
spazsinbad
|
Posted: Feb 21, 2011 - 09:06 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 4615
Location: OZ
|
Navy test pilot says JSF is ‘easy to fly’ By Joshua Stewart - Staff writer Feb 20, 2011
http://www.navytimes.com/news/2011/02/n ... t-022011w/
"The plane frees aviators to focus on mission, Cmdr. Eric ‘Magic’ Buus says.
Cmdr. Eric “Magic” Buus was the first Navy test pilot to fly the F-35B and C. But hearing his take on it, you have to wonder how much the Lightning II variants really need a warm body in the cockpit.
Compared with other fighters, Lockheed Martin’s F-35C — the carrier version of the joint strike fighter — doesn’t require pilots to think as much while in the air, letting them dedicate brain cells to handling complex weapons and the details of the mission, Buus said.
“The point of the multirole fighter is to make it easy to fly. We don’t have to put much thought into flying,” he said.
Buss, who has spent nearly his entire career on F/A-18 Hornets, was the first Navy test pilot to fly both the F-35B — the Marine Corps’ short-takeoff-and-vertical-landing JSF variant — and the F-35C. He flew the Marine version Feb. 3 and the Navy’s on Feb. 11. Both flights were from Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Md. On the F-35C flight, he flew for a little over two hours and tested the plane’s flutter execution system to measure loads on the airframe.
“One of the biggest things that jumps out to me is that it’s very easy to fly,” he said.
The thrust is good, and there’s no indication that the F-35 has only one engine, instead of two like on the Super Hornet, he said.
Compared to the Hornet, it seems “a bit more solid,” Buus said.
Other test pilots say the F-35 feels “stiff,” but no matter the adjective, Buus said its fly-by-wire controls and flight computers make it very responsive. The cockpit, which has its stick on the side instead of the center, is comfortable and has a large touch-screen display.
“I really like a lot of things they have done with this airplane,” he said.
Unlike with other aircrafts, F-35 pilots will fly their first training plane solo; pilots training for other aircraft are accompanied by a flight instructor. Buus said spending the last year in a simulator and doing engine runs left him prepared for his first flight, even though he would fly alone." |
_________________ http://www.adf-history.com/adf/?cat=7 http://alturl.com/4a4ko http://www.youtube.com/user/bengello/videos
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|