Forum: General F-35 Forum

[F-35C UP a POLE] When In Rome [Pole Dancing]



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
spazsinbad
PostPosted: Oct 12, 2012 - 01:58 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 7817
Location: OZ
CodeOne Magazine wrote:

When In Rome
By Sarah Shenk, 8 October 2012


"With a flashy black and yellow tail adorned with a skull and crossbones, the sleek fighter high above the US Air Force Research Laboratory at Rome in upstate New York is hard to miss. This aircraft, which is not actually an aircraft at all, is one of two full-scale models built by Lockheed Martin to measure the antenna performance of the F-35 Lightning II. The paint scheme mimics the insignia of VF-103, the famed US Navy fighter squadron known as the Jolly Rogers.

Measuring the antenna performance, or pole testing, began at Rome Research Lab eight years ago....

...The team went to work constructing the first model – an F-35 frame that would represent both the F-35A conventional takeoff and landing, or CTOL, and short takeoff and vertical landing, or STOVL, variants. The fiberglass and aluminum frame was subcontracted to ATI and designed so that different antennas can be installed at various positions to validate and test gain patterns and performance. The team completed the model, replete with traditional Air Force markings and unique crest of the Air Force Research Lab Test Directorate, in ten months. Testing began in 2004 – a full two years before the first flight of F-35 AA-1, the first test aircraft.

Once the joint Lockheed Martin-USAF JPO team completed the model, the first sets of antennas were installed. The 8,500-pound model was then hoisted atop the fifty-foot tower to begin testing. In its new location, the model is put through thousands of antenna pattern tests to determine if each antenna is working as predicted by the design team....

...Testing the CTOL model was a continuous process; the team completed tests as new antennas became available and as the program needed new information. With the majority of the CTOL testing now complete, Hamre and his team began constructing an F-35C carrier variant model to test how the larger wings and slightly different airframe may impact the aircraft’s additional antennas.

Perched atop the pattern tower since May 2012, the Jolly Roger CV model has completed most of its right-side-up testing. It is now undergoing inverted testing, which is scheduled to be completed by late 2013.

“Testing the CV won’t take as long because most of the basic testing was already done during previous tests on the CTOL model,” Hamre said. “With the CV, we are trying to characterize the larger wing and tail surfaces to see how obscuration is impacted. So far all of the antennas have been working as predicted.”

Over the past eight years, the team has compiled more than 1.5 million pattern files, verified multiple antenna positions, and made pre-production design modifications to ensure the early production models have the final features and capabilities. The models aren’t done making an impact just yet. As the program continues to grow and more F-35s are produced and flying, the CTOL and CV models will continue to perch atop the tower in upstate New York testing antenna patterns and performance of F-35s for international operators.

Sarah Shenk is a communications representative for Lockheed Martin."

LONG ARTICLE - BEST READ AT URL.

Source: http://www.codeonemagazine.com/f35_arti ... tem_id=108



http://www.codeonemagazine.com/images/m ... 7_8547.jpg

CAPTION: "Perched atop the pattern tower since May 2012, the Jolly Roger CV model has completed most of its right side up testing. It is now undergoing inverted testing, which is scheduled to be completed by late 2013."



08_F35_PoleTest_UpsideDown_W_1267828237_8547.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  240.75 KB
 Viewed:  3330 Time(s)

08_F35_PoleTest_UpsideDown_W_1267828237_8547.jpg



_________________
RAN FAA A4G: http://tinyurl.com/ctfwb3t http://tinyurl.com/ccmlenr http://www.youtube.com/user/bengello/videos


Last edited by spazsinbad on Oct 12, 2012 - 09:31 PM; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 18, 2013 - 9:03 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor







Last edited by spazsinbad on Oct 12, 2012 - 09:31 PM; edited 1 time in total
  Send private message  
 
stereospace
PostPosted: Oct 12, 2012 - 03:46 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Nov 21, 2009 - 05:35 PM
Posts: 652
Location: Columbia, Maryland, USA
Status: Offline
The only thing that bothers me is that the model looks nicer than the real thing.

Other than that, this is a good example of how extensive behind the scenes R&DTE is for machine this complex.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
qwe2008
PostPosted: Oct 12, 2012 - 04:02 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Aug 21, 2010 - 10:56 AM
Posts: 180

Status: Offline
there's no EOTS in the model.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
neptune
PostPosted: Oct 12, 2012 - 09:09 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Oct 24, 2008 - 01:03 AM
Posts: 1133
Location: Houston
Status: Offline
qwe2008 wrote:
there's no EOTS in the model.


The chin optics of the (TS) targeting system is limited to targets below the centerline of the fuselage (line of sight).

Bombs usually fall down. Ha! Very Happy
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
SpudmanWP
PostPosted: Oct 12, 2012 - 09:48 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4266
Location: California
Status: Offline
I'm confused Smile. is this an incoming (towards the F-35) radar test range or an outgoing (from the F-35) radar/CNI/ESM/MADL test range?

If outgoing, it does not need the EOTS.

_________________
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
neptune
PostPosted: Oct 12, 2012 - 10:42 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Oct 24, 2008 - 01:03 AM
Posts: 1133
Location: Houston
Status: Offline
SpudmanWP wrote:
I'm confused Smile. is this an incoming (towards the F-35) radar test range or an outgoing (from the F-35) radar/CNI/ESM/MADL test range?

If outgoing, it does not need the EOTS.


Outgoing.

Not knowing the antenna locations or frequencies, it would be necessary to model the adjoining devices for reflection or interferences. The system engineers would have determined if the chin box was necessary. I offer that from the camera angle it might not be visible, if it's there.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
SpudmanWP
PostPosted: Oct 12, 2012 - 10:48 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4266
Location: California
Status: Offline
Thanks, that's what I was leaning towards considering the pole is not LO and the quote is from a "communications representative".

_________________
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
spazsinbad
PostPosted: Oct 13, 2012 - 02:19 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 7817
Location: OZ
Conformal Load-Bearing Antenna Structure for
Australian Defence Force Aircraft
Paul J. Callus

http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA470328 (0.55Mb)



AntennaeF-35diagram-.gif
 Description:
 Filesize:  373.39 KB
 Viewed:  2889 Time(s)

AntennaeF-35diagram-.gif



_________________
RAN FAA A4G: http://tinyurl.com/ctfwb3t http://tinyurl.com/ccmlenr http://www.youtube.com/user/bengello/videos
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic