Forum: General

Thunderbirds aircraft



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1, 2
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
Gus
PostPosted: Sep 02, 2004 - 03:47 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Aug 18, 2004 - 04:38 AM
Posts: 98

Status: Offline
Roscoe,

The pre-block 40 jets (C models) do have a DMS (and have for as long as I know) which does the exact same thing as the Block 40. CUPID added the CounterMeasures Switch (CMS) to the older Cs for a hands on way to dispense chaff/flares. It also added an elbow switch aft of the "slap" switch on the left bulkhead.

Otherwise, you got it right. DMS left cycles the Left MFD pages and DMS right cycles the Right MFD pages. DMS aft moves the SOI back and forth from the MFDs, and if in a proper avionics mode, DMS forward sets the SOI to the HUD....but let's not open up that big can of worms!!!

Habu,

Not to butt in (ok, I am), but the dogfight switch doesn't have a momentary direction. It stays in the position it's put in. The speedbrake switch will re-center on its own from the aft position. That may be the one you are thinking of.

V/R

Gus
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 26, 2012 - 5:07 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
parrothead
PostPosted: Sep 02, 2004 - 06:26 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: May 11, 2004 - 12:04 AM
Posts: 3280

Status: Offline
Thanks again for all the info guys!!!

_________________
No plane on Sunday, maybe be one come Monday...
www.parrotheadjeff.com
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Roscoe
PostPosted: Sep 03, 2004 - 03:04 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jun 29, 2004 - 09:14 PM
Posts: 1253
Location: Las Vegas
Status: Offline
Gus wrote:
CUPID added the CounterMeasures Switch (CMS) to the older Cs for a hands on way to dispense chaff/flares. It also added an elbow switch aft of the "slap" switch on the left bulkhead.


I knew that Very Happy (now that you said it)


Gus wrote:
DMS aft moves the SOI back and forth from the MFDs, and if in a proper avionics mode, DMS forward sets the SOI to the HUD....but let's not open up that big can of worms!!!


I can't think of anything that gnerated more confusion than SOI selection. More than once a test pilot got hung up because of block differences in SOI handling. Made for painfiul debriefs...

_________________
Roscoe

<b>"It's time to get medieval, I'm goin' in for guns"</b> - <i>Dos Gringos</i>
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Gus
PostPosted: Sep 06, 2004 - 12:01 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Aug 18, 2004 - 04:38 AM
Posts: 98

Status: Offline
Roscoe,

It also made for some serious cursor zeros when we used VRP or VIP and the SOI was in the radar..radar slew gains vs HUD slew gains...Pretty funny watching that stuff bounce around the HUD trying to control the VRP!!

Now that we have EGI, I can't remember the last time I used VRP.

Gus
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
lamoey
PostPosted: Sep 17, 2004 - 06:13 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Apr 25, 2004 - 06:44 PM
Posts: 595

Status: Offline
What about the engine. Do they all have the same engine type, or more importantly, I assume, the thrust available? I would think that it could be a challenge for a pilot to stay in formation if he has either much more or less powerful engine than the rest of the formation.

_________________
Former Flight Control Technican - We keep'em flying
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
diamond1
PostPosted: Sep 17, 2004 - 07:40 PM Reply with quote Back to top



Joined: Feb 01, 2007 - 02:38 AM
Posts: 0

Status: Offline
They are a stock F100-PW-220/-220E engine aside from the polished external nozzle segments (Turkey Feathers) and oil pipe.

See: http://www.f-16.net/f-16_photos_album47-photoabk.html

See also: http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/Organizations/ ... -DFRC.html

Thunderbird Aircraft -Engine History
Republic F-84G - Allison J35 A-29 – 1953-1955
Republic F-84F - Wright J65W-3 – 1955-1956
North American F-100C – Pratt & Whitney J57-P-21A - 1956-1964
Republic F105B - Pratt & Whitney J75-P-3 or -5 – 1964 (6 shows)
North American F-100D - Pratt & Whitney J57-P-21A - 1964-1969
McDonnell Douglas F-4E - General Electric J79-GE-17 – 1969-1974
Northrop T-38A – General Electric J85-GE-5 – 1974-1983
General Dynamics F-16A Blk15 – Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-200 - 1983-?
General Dynamics F-16A Blk15 – Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-220 (Re-engined) ?-1992
(GD)Lockheed F-16C Blk32 – Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-220 – 1992-Today

Engine Manufacturer – Total years of Thunderbird service
Wright – 1
Allison – 2
General Electric 14
Pratt & Whitney 34

Does anyone know when the engine upgrade was done to the Thunderbirds "A" Vipers? Should have been after the -220 OCU employment in 1988 and prior to their 1991 season?

I don’t think the Thunderbirds will ever use the F110 in the Viper. It has poor low oil pressure tolerance, and will size if the engine is operated at MIL in a negative-G situation for more than a 20 seconds. The F100 will operate at MIL with low oil pressure for 30 seconds or more. A big consideration for demonstration flying.


Last edited by diamond1 on Nov 19, 2004 - 07:29 AM; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
lamoey
PostPosted: Sep 17, 2004 - 09:39 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Apr 25, 2004 - 06:44 PM
Posts: 595

Status: Offline
Thanks bix. Very interesting. I assume that this means that they all have the same engine and that the DEEC ensures that a certain trottle setting will give the same thrust in all planes. What if one of the engines are a little tired and has, for arguments sake, a 10% drop in max thrust. Will the top 10% of the trottle motion, before the Augmenter cicks in, basically not make any difference to the thrust? Will the DEEC allow the engine to go above the defined 100% thrust?

_________________
Former Flight Control Technican - We keep'em flying
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
diamond1
PostPosted: Sep 17, 2004 - 11:33 PM Reply with quote Back to top



Joined: Feb 01, 2007 - 02:38 AM
Posts: 0

Status: Offline
No, I think you're seeing it backwards.

Even if the engine is tired, it will adjust to maintain so much thrust at MIL. A new engine will not work as hard to maintain that but the it will keep MIL regardless. It is a set thing.

Understand? The more "tired" the engine gets, the harder it will run it to maintain the desired thrust for any given setting. As a result Engine wear will accelerate the more that engine ages. The more wear, the harder it runs, the harder it runs, the faster it wears......... get it? The wear curve gets quite steep as the engine core reaches it's cycle life but the power output will stay constant. (6-8 years) If the engine can not produce the required thrust for any reason a FAULT is declared and reported.

As an engine ages the thing that suffers is fuel consumption. (Much like an auto engine) When the engine looses compression, it needs more fuel to make the same amount of power.

So if your Thunderbird Viper has a brand "new" engine, or an "old" engine they will both make the same thrust at 85%, MIL, MIN AB, or MAX AB. (Give or take just a bit....)


Last edited by diamond1 on Nov 19, 2004 - 07:33 AM; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
habu2
PostPosted: Sep 18, 2004 - 04:27 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Sep 05, 2003 - 09:36 PM
Posts: 2812

Status: Offline
This is slightly off-topic, but I found an old photo of the Blue Angels I took back in 1987 - I thought some here might get a kick out of it...



ZappedBA.jpg
 Description:
zapped
 Filesize:  53.05 KB
 Viewed:  1110 Time(s)

ZappedBA.jpg



_________________
Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
lamoey
PostPosted: Sep 18, 2004 - 04:59 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Apr 25, 2004 - 06:44 PM
Posts: 595

Status: Offline
Thanks bix, that made it clear. Clever system.

_________________
Former Flight Control Technican - We keep'em flying
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
LinkF16SimDude
PostPosted: Sep 19, 2004 - 04:05 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Jan 31, 2004 - 07:18 PM
Posts: 2232

Status: Offline
habu2 wrote:
LinkF-16SimDude, isn't the dogfight switch configured such that one direction is momentary, and the other direction and the center position 'fixed' ?


Not to my knowledge. That's the Speed Brake switch you're thinkin' of. "Closed" (forward) and "Open" (center) are fixed positions but the "Override" position (aft and hold) is momentary. Override pops the boards full out (+/- 60 degrees IIRC) as long as the switch is held full aft. Take your thumb off the switch and the boards go back to the normal open position.

......and once again I should probably read the WHOLE thread before pontificating. Thanks Gus!! Wink Laughing
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Tankrat
PostPosted: Sep 19, 2004 - 07:46 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Apr 08, 2004 - 10:40 PM
Posts: 201

A Tunderbird jet holds 58 gallons of smoke oil, the smoke drum is where the ammunition drum was, the cannon is also removed to accomidate smoke oil plumbing. The plumbing ends up on the left side of the engine exhaust.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
parrothead
PostPosted: Sep 20, 2004 - 02:31 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: May 11, 2004 - 12:04 AM
Posts: 3280

Status: Offline
Thanks for all the info, guys!

_________________
No plane on Sunday, maybe be one come Monday...
www.parrotheadjeff.com
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2012 F-16.net