| Author |
Message |
|
kori
|
 Posted: Oct 16, 2010 - 05:45 AM
|
 
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Mar 28, 2010 - 07:14 AM
Posts: 112
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
|
| Title pretty much says it all, will it? can it? has it? |
_________________
I'm safer up here, then you are down there.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: May 25, 2013 - 5:07 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
psychmike
|
|
Posted: Oct 16, 2010 - 06:44 AM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Jul 27, 2004 - 09:09 PM
Posts: 231
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
velocity264c
|
|
Posted: Oct 16, 2010 - 07:42 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 28, 2010 - 06:35 AM
Posts: 46
Location: United States
Status: Offline
|
when Russia finally builds at least 50 Su-35BMs ad at least 10 T-50 PAK FAs.   |
Last edited by velocity264c on Oct 17, 2010 - 06:14 AM; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
neptune
|
|
Posted: Oct 16, 2010 - 07:18 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Oct 24, 2008 - 01:03 AM
Posts: 1145
Location: Houston
Status: Offline
|
ONLY WHEN THE WINGS FALL OFF!
The Raptor is the first of the software a/c and will be upgraded cheaper than building any follow on a/c. The technology advances we learn from the Lightning will be retro-fitted or upgraded to the Raptor. With stealth, a gun and maneuverability even the "furball" addicts have to admit it's superiority. All the others can only wish to be flying a Raptor! Check6!  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
falconfirm
|
|
Posted: Oct 16, 2010 - 09:01 PM
|
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Apr 11, 2008 - 01:57 AM
Posts: 9
Status: Offline
|
When the F-35 becomes operational,thats why we cut the number of F-22's to 183.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scorpion82
|
|
Posted: Oct 16, 2010 - 09:59 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Oct 07, 2007 - 07:52 PM
Posts: 992
Status: Offline
|
| The F-22 will become outdated if it's not capable to perform its task effectively anymore. By that time a more advanced and capable successor is likely to be fielded. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kori
|
|
Posted: Oct 17, 2010 - 04:28 AM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Mar 28, 2010 - 07:14 AM
Posts: 112
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
|
|
velocity264c wrote:
when Russia finally builds at least 5 Su-35BMs ad at least 10 T-50 PAK FAs.
yea maybe 5/10 for 1 raptor 
Just to pull a date out of the air...2030/2040, possibly still operational then? |
_________________
I'm safer up here, then you are down there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
velocity264c
|
|
Posted: Oct 17, 2010 - 06:15 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 28, 2010 - 06:35 AM
Posts: 46
Location: United States
Status: Offline
|
|
kori wrote:
velocity264c wrote:
when Russia finally builds at least 50 Su-35BMs ad at least 10 T-50 PAK FAs.
yea maybe 50/10 for 1 raptor
Just to pull a date out of the air...2030/2040, possibly still operational then?
error in my message, I mean 50 Su-35s hence they cant even make that mark for something that cost less than the F-22.
maybe the year 2080? |
Last edited by velocity264c on Oct 17, 2010 - 10:59 AM; edited 5 times in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
primorsky
|
|
Posted: Oct 17, 2010 - 10:20 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 05, 2010 - 02:12 PM
Posts: 62
Location: RF
Status: Offline
|
|
velocity264c wrote:
kori wrote:
velocity264c wrote:
when Russia finally builds at least 5o Su-35BMs ad at least 10 T-50 PAK FAs.
yea maybe 5o/10 for 1 raptor
Just to pull a date out of the air...2030/2040, possibly still operational then?
error in my message, I mean 50 Su-35s
48 Su-35S is the only first purchasing order for VVS, not the final number of operational aircraft that planned.
Quote:
hence they cant even make that mark for something that cost less than the F-22.
Really? How you know? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
velocity264c
|
|
Posted: Oct 17, 2010 - 10:49 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 28, 2010 - 06:35 AM
Posts: 46
Location: United States
Status: Offline
|
|
primorsky wrote:
velocity264c wrote:
kori wrote:
velocity264c wrote:
when Russia finally builds at least 50 Su-35BMs ad at least 10 T-50 PAK FAs.
yea maybe 5o/10 for 1 raptor
Just to pull a date out of the air...2030/2040, possibly still operational then?
error in my message, I mean 50 Su-35s
48 Su-35S is the only first purchasing order for VVS, not the final number of operational aircraft that planned.
Quote:
hence they cant even make that mark for something that cost less than the F-22.
Really? How you know?
theirs things I know you wont until possibly <50 years.
I meant in current service, not ordered. Still need 10 PAK FAs. I should have put 10 stealthy PAK FAs, and not meaning PAK FA that have small RCS if thats even going to be at least what they are. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wrightwing
|
|
Posted: Oct 18, 2010 - 12:29 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K
Joined: Oct 23, 2008 - 04:22 PM
Posts: 2025
Status: Offline
|
|
primorsky wrote:
48 Su-35S is the only first purchasing order for VVS, not the final number of operational aircraft that planned.
Can you please show us a source that talks about a larger buy than 48? I've yet to see one. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Private Messages
Forum Guidelines
