F-22 internal fuel?

Anything goes, as long as it is about the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor
Active Member
Active Member
 
Posts: 180
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 09:56

by qwe2008 » 25 Sep 2010, 04:11

Attachments
F22-fuel.JPG
Last edited by qwe2008 on 25 Sep 2010, 06:59, edited 2 times in total.


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 7720
Joined: 24 Sep 2008, 08:55

by popcorn » 25 Sep 2010, 05:23

I got 3581.4 gallons internal capacity adding up all the internal fuel cells (transfer and feed).


Enthusiast
Enthusiast
 
Posts: 57
Joined: 26 Aug 2010, 04:58
Location: USA

by flyboy22 » 25 Sep 2010, 17:07

nope about 18k internal, 26k with two bags.


User avatar
Senior member
Senior member
 
Posts: 301
Joined: 23 Nov 2006, 13:54

by BDF » 25 Sep 2010, 20:00

Yep, the official count is 18,448lbs internal. Not quite sure why the TechOrd shows something different unless one of the smaller tank groups has been intentionally deactivated somehow for some reason. It seems to odd to me too that an official pub was that far off.
When it comes to fighting Raptors, "We die wholesale..."


Enthusiast
Enthusiast
 
Posts: 55
Joined: 10 Nov 2005, 01:28

by djcross » 26 Sep 2010, 03:18

Usable fuel + ullage volume + unusable fuel = tank internal volume


Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 565
Joined: 04 Jul 2007, 00:22

by JetTest » 26 Sep 2010, 09:14

It looks like the last notes above are talking gallons vs pounds


Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 6001
Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 01:24
Location: Nashua NH USA

by sprstdlyscottsmn » 26 Sep 2010, 15:43

I think djcross has it, the other 1600lbs is unusable fuel that will be trapped in the system even if the engines are starved.
"Spurts"

-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic
-FMS Systems Engineer
-PFD Systems Engineer
-PATRIOT Systems Engineer


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 5910
Joined: 22 Jul 2005, 03:23

by sferrin » 26 Sep 2010, 18:25

sprstdlyscottsmn wrote:I think djcross has it, the other 1600lbs is unusable fuel that will be trapped in the system even if the engines are starved.


That's sounds like lousy design since you've effectively added 1600lbs of ballast.
"There I was. . ."


Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 582
Joined: 30 Jan 2010, 03:27
Location: California

by shingen » 27 Sep 2010, 02:33

Heat sink?


Active Member
Active Member
 
Posts: 191
Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 02:17

by lampshade111 » 27 Sep 2010, 03:59

I've heard numbers ranging from 18,000 to 21,000.


Enthusiast
Enthusiast
 
Posts: 57
Joined: 26 Aug 2010, 04:58
Location: USA

by flyboy22 » 27 Sep 2010, 13:34

lampshade111 wrote:I've heard numbers ranging from 18,000 to 21,000.


It's 18,000 pounds internal. It's all usable if all the fuel pumps are operating normally.


Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 962
Joined: 15 Feb 2013, 16:05

by uclass » 08 Mar 2016, 13:57

I actually added it up to 13029L, which is about 23504lbs, assuming 0.82kg per lb but DoD say 18,448lbs usable.
Last edited by uclass on 09 Mar 2016, 13:50, edited 2 times in total.


Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 962
Joined: 15 Feb 2013, 16:05

by uclass » 08 Mar 2016, 14:05

djcross wrote:Usable fuel + ullage volume + unusable fuel = tank internal volume

So does unusable fuel include the 10% reserve, or is the reserve classed as usable?


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 5910
Joined: 22 Jul 2005, 03:23

by sferrin » 08 Mar 2016, 14:07

uclass wrote:I actually added it up to 13029L, which is about 23504lbs, assuming 0.82kg per lb but LM say 18,448lbs usable.

Oddly enough, 23,500lbs is the exact difference between empty and loaded weight.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_ ... 28F-22A.29


Something's wrong there. There's no way there's 5000lbs of unusable fuel.
"There I was. . ."


User avatar
Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1870
Joined: 31 Dec 2015, 05:35
Location: Australia

by element1loop » 08 Mar 2016, 14:31

uclass wrote:
djcross wrote:Usable fuel + ullage volume + unusable fuel = tank internal volume

So does unusable fuel include the 10% reserve, or is the reserve classed as usable?


Unusable is the portion that can not be pumped out of tank to engine. It's usually counted as part of defined aircraft empty weight and normally ignored. The formally given fuel weight is the fully consumable fraction.

Reserve fuel is reserved from the total loaded fuel weight.
Last edited by element1loop on 08 Mar 2016, 14:34, edited 1 time in total.


Next

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests