| Author |
Message |
|
Guysmiley
|
Posted: Jul 20, 2010 - 05:42 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: May 26, 2005 - 08:39 PM
Posts: 1496
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 18, 2013 - 8:49 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
squirl
|
Posted: Jul 20, 2010 - 06:21 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Feb 27, 2005 - 08:13 AM
Posts: 43
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
avon1944
|
Posted: Jul 24, 2010 - 06:13 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Nov 24, 2004 - 02:03 AM
Posts: 394
Status: Offline
|
I notice at the time of 43-sec. to 54-sec., the bottom of half of the F-22 appeared hotter than the top! I would have expected just the opposit.
Thanx for the video. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Prinz_Eugn
|
Posted: Jul 24, 2010 - 07:14 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Aug 03, 2008 - 04:35 AM
Posts: 859
Status: Offline
|
|
avon1944 wrote:
I notice at the time of 43-sec. to 54-sec., the bottom of half of the F-22 appeared hotter than the top! I would have expected just the opposit.
Thanx for the video.
Yeah, there's bare metal at the bottom, like an F-15. Makes me worry about IR signature...
At least you can tell that afterburner crazy increases the signature, making it obvious why supercruise is such a big deal. |
_________________ "A visitor from Mars could easily pick out the civilized nations. They have the best implements of war."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
madrat
|
Posted: Jul 24, 2010 - 08:58 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Mar 03, 2010 - 03:12 AM
Posts: 986
Status: Offline
|
| Notice it was cold overall until it lit the afterburner. The F-22 won't need an afterburner most of the time. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Neno
|
Posted: Jul 24, 2010 - 09:11 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Sep 29, 2006 - 11:35 AM
Posts: 220
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
|
If Raptors have some triks to reduce IR signature or make cooler the body, probably they don't activate it on airshows (in the same way they carry RCS enhancer).
They were also showed at relatively short distances. At thoose ranges they probably appear on radar screen too. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
exorcet
|
Posted: Jul 24, 2010 - 06:16 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Oct 07, 2009 - 04:35 PM
Posts: 154
Location: US
Status: Offline
|
|
Neno wrote:
If Raptors have some triks to reduce IR signature or make cooler the body, probably they don't activate it on airshows (in the same way they carry RCS enhancer).
They were also showed at relatively short distances. At thoose ranges they probably appear on radar screen too.
I'd figure that it would be harder to "deactivate" IR signature reduction than radar, unless maybe the F-22 shuts off the circulation of fuel through the airframe.
Perhaps the temperature distribution is the result of performing supermaneuverability, ie, the bottom is going to see a lot of air and bring it close to stagnation, raising the temperature. This would heat the bottom as most maneuvers are + AoA. That's just a guess though. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
avon1944
|
Posted: Jul 24, 2010 - 07:41 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Nov 24, 2004 - 02:03 AM
Posts: 394
Status: Offline
|
|
Neno wrote:
If Raptors have some triks to reduce IR signature or make cooler the body, probably they don't activate it on airshows (in the same way they carry RCS enhancer).
Gosh, I hadn't thought of that but, it makes perfect sense. Even the old SR-71 had IR reduction measures. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
geogen
|
Posted: Jul 25, 2010 - 02:48 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Mar 11, 2008 - 03:28 PM
Posts: 2804
Location: 45 km offshore, New England
Status: Offline
|
I'd concur with Prinz's seemingly no-brainer comment: the value of super-cruise. That tactical (and arguably strategic) advantage needs no further explanation, imho.
Below are comparative stills of fairly equivalent F-22 and Typhoon images in IR, while in after-burner (no IR reduction treatments here folks, sorry) and taken from the same airshow and from same FLIR. Roughly 70k lbf total thrust vs 40k total lbf.
Interesting to note is the F-22's apparent FLIR-neutral canopy... You wonder if they could bottle and spray some kind of whatever-that-canopy-effect-is-treatment over the standard RAM treatment?
 |
_________________ The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
squirl
|
Posted: Jul 25, 2010 - 04:57 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Feb 27, 2005 - 08:13 AM
Posts: 43
Status: Offline
|
Just another
Maybe the F-22/EF/F-35 use materials/coatings that emit mostly in certain parts of the spectrum. Certain frequencies are completely absorbed by water, CO2, etc. in the atmosphere, as seen below (from Wikipedia). Don't know the specs for the sensor used in the display, but as some have noted, perhaps it's of use only at the close ranges during the show.
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
VarkVet
|
Posted: Jul 25, 2010 - 05:30 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Oct 30, 2006 - 04:31 AM
Posts: 1442
Status: Offline
|
Weird sh*t?
Funny how you put all your money in one basket to avoid radar, and something else still see’s ya? |
_________________ My eyes have seen the glory of the Lord and the esthetics of the Flightline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
madrat
|
Posted: Jul 25, 2010 - 07:41 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Mar 03, 2010 - 03:12 AM
Posts: 986
Status: Offline
|
| Glass material typically doesn't let IR emissions through. If you've ever watched the home thermal imaging guys they show heat escaping around windows rapidly. Surprisingly the window glass isn't losing heat by their images. In reality the glass is, even triple panes, nowhere near the r-value of an insulated wall. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Guysmiley
|
Posted: Jul 25, 2010 - 04:59 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: May 26, 2005 - 08:39 PM
Posts: 1496
|
| The thing is VarkVet, IR is a shorter ranged sensor than radar that can't search a large volume of space quickly (not to mention being at the mercy of meteorological conditions) and even with a state of the art IRST you can't get range data accurately. I'd assume once you're close enough to be spotted by an IIR sensor you're probably close enough to be detected on radar regardless of stealthy RCS. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
munny
|
Posted: Jul 26, 2010 - 04:29 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jan 13, 2010 - 01:39 AM
Posts: 527
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
jetnerd
|
Posted: Jul 26, 2010 - 07:29 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Apr 24, 2009 - 02:22 AM
Posts: 113
Location: Southern U.S.
Status: Offline
|
| Could the darkened canopy area in the F-22 IR photo just simply be from the cooling of the cockpit from the environmental control systems? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|