Forum: Military Aircraft of the Cold War

F-8 Crusader losses



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
Gums
PostPosted: Jun 10, 2010 - 07:07 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Dec 16, 2003 - 05:26 PM
Posts: 1439

Status: Offline
Salute!

Another thread has a reference to the total Crusader losses.

I don't buy the numbers, as one author alleges that 88% of the jets were lost.

Only jet I know of that had many losses was the THUD.

Gums wants to know.

out,

_________________
Gums
Viper pilot '79
"God in your guts, good men at your back, wings that stay on - and Tally Ho!"
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 24, 2013 - 10:12 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
Prinz_Eugn
PostPosted: Jun 10, 2010 - 10:57 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 03, 2008 - 04:35 AM
Posts: 859

Status: Offline
I dunno, but here's a start: http://www.ejection-history.org.uk/Airc ... mended.htm

I'll keep looking, see what I can find.

_________________
"A visitor from Mars could easily pick out the civilized nations. They have the best implements of war."
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
That_Engine_Guy
PostPosted: Jun 11, 2010 - 03:00 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Dec 14, 2005 - 05:03 AM
Posts: 2198
Location: Under the engine somewhere.
Status: Offline
Brother Gums,

Revisiting some old MIL-AV links in my IE did prove to find many dead and or dying.

One did reveal the knowledge you speak of; "The Gunfighter's Site" - http://www.cloudnet.com/~djohnson/index.html

REF: "Records" section

Quote:
"Safety" Record - a point of perverse pride. Overall accident rate of 46.70 per 100,000 hrs. (For comparison: A-4: 23.36; F-4: 20.17; F-14: 9.32). Many reasons probable, none of which include pilot inadequacy. The VIW wing (or something) made it a strange beast on final; 140 kts+/- approach speeds to a 27C; gremlins; "tiger" attitude, to close for the kill on anything, anyplace, any time, with any weapon available, apparently including the airplane. In an article in the August 2000 issue of Flight Journal, Paul Gilcrist points out that "the accident statistics of the Crusader in the Fleet was atrocious . . . the Navy bought 1266 Crusaders during those years and at the same time, experienced 1106 major Crusader accidents. In other words, some intrepid aviator or other crashed virtually every Crusader ever built!"


87.36% by those numbers; some may not have been 'write-offs', but at that rate some most likely crashed twice!?!

Shocked TEG

_________________
[Airplanes are] near perfect, all they lack is the ability to forgive.
— Richard Collins
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
outlaw162
PostPosted: Jun 11, 2010 - 04:07 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Feb 28, 2008 - 02:33 AM
Posts: 968

Status: Offline
"When you're out of F-8's, you're out of fighters."

Literally.

OL
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Gums
PostPosted: Jun 11, 2010 - 04:43 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Dec 16, 2003 - 05:26 PM
Posts: 1439

Status: Offline
Salute!

TEG, Prinz and Outlaw, I can't believe the friggin' numbers. Sheesh.

There's a book in our local liberry called something like "Mig Master", referring to the F-8's good record in 'nam. Will check that sucker.

One of the projects in my second career had to do with slaving the AIM-9 seeker to your radar or other "pointing" sensor. The program used the Crusader. Was a clever method the Navy used to bias the seeker position, I must say.

Always thot the Zipper was the one with the worst record, so the Crusader numbers are a shock.

LTV musta done something unique with the SLUF, as it did just fine. Sure, we had some motor problems early on, but that was it.

later,

Gums sends ....

_________________
Gums
Viper pilot '79
"God in your guts, good men at your back, wings that stay on - and Tally Ho!"
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Guysmiley
PostPosted: Jun 11, 2010 - 04:03 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: May 26, 2005 - 08:39 PM
Posts: 1496

I dunno, according to Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club by Rene Francillon it was 118 F-8s lost during the war in total, 57 due to combat. Not sure what the different authors are using as the difference between "major accident" and "lost" though...
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
TC
PostPosted: Jun 20, 2010 - 01:09 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Moderator
F-16.net Moderator


Joined: Jan 14, 2004 - 07:06 AM
Posts: 4006

Status: Offline
That would make a little more sense. The worst losses due to combat would very likey have been the Thud. However, no doubt several were lost due to landing mishaps, etc.

_________________
"He counted on America to be passive...He counted wrong." -- President Ronald Reagan
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
aaam
PostPosted: Feb 25, 2011 - 11:17 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Aug 21, 2010 - 11:52 PM
Posts: 462

Status: Offline
ADM Paul Gilchrist would absolutely be in the to know. Although, he, like many, loved the F-8, it's safety record was appalling, and it was a real bear to bring back aboard the boat.

BTW, the US plane that got the most gun kills in the Vietnam War was the Thud.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic