| Author |
Message |
|
viperman26
|
Posted: Nov 18, 2005 - 06:30 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Feb 28, 2005 - 09:40 PM
Posts: 253
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Status: Offline
|
What distance away from a bandit would a viper pilot change from using an Aim-9 to an Aim-120 (or Vice Versa)? Is there a standard distance when a viperdriver would switch from one to the next depending on where he/she is (distance from the bandit)? Does the AIM-9X change this up at all?
I'm assuming that in a WVR you'd select an AIM-9, and for BVR you'd want to use an AIM-120. All and all, I figure this would be done on what the pilot's instincts are at the time, And Assuming that they have two different types of missles (ex. AIM-9 and an AIM-120)
Thanks in advance. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Feb 12, 2012 - 8:20 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
TenguNoHi
|
Posted: Nov 18, 2005 - 07:30 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Sep 29, 2004 - 05:24 AM
Posts: 920
Status: Offline
|
Attack envelopes and missile performance. I think I could take a pretty good shot at this but Ill let a pilot answer instead.
-Aaron |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Roscoe
|
Posted: Nov 18, 2005 - 03:09 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jun 29, 2004 - 09:14 PM
Posts: 1248
Location: Las Vegas
Status: Offline
|
| AIM-120s are still effective WVR. Many variables, for example are we talking a tail shot or a face shot? Assuming heart of the envelope, I beleive a radar guided -120 is a better choice than an IR guided -9 anytime, but angles, closure rates, ranges, background (IR or radar clutter) all play a factor. |
_________________ Roscoe
<b>"It's time to get medieval, I'm goin' in for guns"</b> - <i>Dos Gringos</i>
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Lightndattic
|
Posted: Nov 18, 2005 - 04:04 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Oct 06, 2005 - 01:43 PM
Posts: 422
Status: Offline
|
Ideally, right after you've dogfought to a draw and your opponent tries to extend and escape. -120 right up the tail.
The vice versa would be after your initial long range head on shot missed and you've merged. Crank it around as hard as you can and shoot a -9x, hopefully before your opponent does the same with his HOBS missle. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Rexxxx
|
Posted: Nov 18, 2005 - 05:20 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Mar 29, 2005 - 01:56 AM
Posts: 265
Location: Columbus AFB, MS
Status: Offline
|
It is kinda difficult to flare off a radar guided missile.  |
_________________ 62FS, Luke AFB 02-03
524FS, Cannon AFB 03-06
560FTS, Randolph AFB 06
50FTS, Columbus AFB 06-
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tico
|
Posted: Nov 18, 2005 - 11:25 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Nov 15, 2005 - 11:29 PM
Posts: 7
Status: Offline
|
|
Rexxxx wrote:
It is kinda difficult to flare off a radar guided missile.
This is what chaff and ECM is for. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Rexxxx
|
Posted: Nov 19, 2005 - 01:37 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Mar 29, 2005 - 01:56 AM
Posts: 265
Location: Columbus AFB, MS
Status: Offline
|
| True, but the question was (basically) when to use the AIM-9 vs AIM-120, or gun, I guess. In that case, it's really hard to flare off or tron a 20mm shell. (Yes, I know that's what jinking is for). |
_________________ 62FS, Luke AFB 02-03
524FS, Cannon AFB 03-06
560FTS, Randolph AFB 06
50FTS, Columbus AFB 06-
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Velvet
|
Posted: Nov 19, 2005 - 01:58 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Nov 18, 2005 - 07:40 PM
Posts: 60
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Status: Offline
|
| With a positive hostile ID, shoot him with the most effective weapon for the WEZ that you're in. If he's flaring, shoot him with a AIM-120. If he's jammimg, with an AIM-9 or maybe both. Even if it doesn't kill him it'll really be bad for his nerves. At the same time don't forget to do good BFM. The answer is It Depends... |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Lisafer
|
Posted: Nov 19, 2005 - 05:40 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Mar 30, 2005 - 11:30 PM
Posts: 186
Location: left of right
Status: Offline
|
It depends is a favourite saying isn't it? Guess it is true though  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tico
|
Posted: Nov 19, 2005 - 07:54 AM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Nov 15, 2005 - 11:29 PM
Posts: 7
Status: Offline
|
|
Lisafer wrote:
It depends is a favourite saying isn't it? Guess it is true though
What did you expect? For the real answer, ask the pilots.
There is also an opinion, that for close-in combat, radar guided missiles are not as effective as IR guided, because radial velocity of evading aircraft may be faster at these distances, then radar tracking ability. Unless, of course, you have a PAR. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
TenguNoHi
|
Posted: Nov 19, 2005 - 10:24 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Sep 29, 2004 - 05:24 AM
Posts: 920
Status: Offline
|
Rexxxx and Roscoe are both pilots.
-Aaron |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Velvet
|
Posted: Nov 19, 2005 - 08:29 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Nov 18, 2005 - 07:40 PM
Posts: 60
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Status: Offline
|
I am a pilot.
For radar missiles, if it's an older SAR missile (AIM-7) it'll require continuous radar illumination until impact. If you're BFMing that guy, guess what? You'll be pulling in his plane of motion to bring him to the HUD for another weapons employment opportunity until you see a fireball, so your relative radial velocity should be pretty easy for your radar to handle. For an Aim-120, you only need initial data for launch, then it's radar is doing the work, not yours. The biggest advantage of IR missiles in close is they tend to have a shorter minimum range and the newer ones are optimized for short range maneuvering engagements. The 120 is a medium range weapon, but it works very nicely in a visual engagement at times. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tico
|
Posted: Nov 19, 2005 - 09:13 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Nov 15, 2005 - 11:29 PM
Posts: 7
Status: Offline
|
| Velvet, thanks for the answers. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
ts79
|
Posted: Nov 19, 2005 - 11:16 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Oct 16, 2005 - 02:39 PM
Posts: 40
Status: Offline
|
| aim-9 with the acm mode outboard, aim-120 acm mode center position...technique only, best of both worlds |
_________________ ...and anything else is rubbish
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|