Forum: F-16 News

480 FS to return?



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   1, 2  Next
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
Asif
PostPosted: Apr 04, 2010 - 11:43 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Aug 23, 2003 - 01:02 PM
Posts: 2799

As we know the 22nd FS are closing shop at Spang this summer, but can anyone also confirm the status of 23rd FS?. Rumours both squadrons will combine into the 480 FS.

_________________
Asif Shamim
F-16.net Editorial staff & Patch Gallery Administration
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 21, 2013 - 4:51 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
Boman
PostPosted: Apr 05, 2010 - 12:24 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 08, 2004 - 08:22 PM
Posts: 1106

Status: Offline
??? That's new - thought the 22FS would disband, leaving the only flying units in the 52FW to be 81FS and 23FS ?

Don't see any point in doing such a move either - should cost more than the gain would be?
I have checked Spandahlem.af.mil regularly latelly, and there is absolutelly nothgin to be found on the 22FS closing doors either
Strange....

_________________
Best regards
Niels

http://s587.photobucket.com/albums/ss316/NC-Boman/
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
vegasfalconfixer
PostPosted: Apr 06, 2010 - 04:37 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Aug 23, 2005 - 09:49 PM
Posts: 45
Location: RAF Alconbury, United Kingdom
Status: Offline
The 23rd is actually the one closing now. The 22nd will absorb the 23rd's remaining aircraft and people, then be deactivated and reactivated as the 480th. The 81st will remain unchanged.

_________________
Jeremy
Hill 96-00
Osan 00-01
Nellis 01-05
Kunsan 05-06
Spang 06-10
RAF Alconbury (Postal!) Pres-??
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Boman
PostPosted: Apr 06, 2010 - 05:09 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 08, 2004 - 08:22 PM
Posts: 1106

Status: Offline
That is sad news - 23FS is my favourite unit Sad

_________________
Best regards
Niels

http://s587.photobucket.com/albums/ss316/NC-Boman/
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
vegasfalconfixer
PostPosted: Apr 06, 2010 - 05:54 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Aug 23, 2005 - 09:49 PM
Posts: 45
Location: RAF Alconbury, United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Just came from the 23rd AMU. Great bunch of maintainers there, and I will miss a lot of them. But Spangdahlem? The best view I had of that place was when it was fading into the distance in my rearview mirror.

_________________
Jeremy
Hill 96-00
Osan 00-01
Nellis 01-05
Kunsan 05-06
Spang 06-10
RAF Alconbury (Postal!) Pres-??
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Boman
PostPosted: Apr 06, 2010 - 05:59 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 08, 2004 - 08:22 PM
Posts: 1106

Status: Offline
Never seen the place, but like the Vipers Very Happy

Why do they close the 23FS, and rename the 22FS into 480FS? Don't understand the logic? Also the earlier reports indicated that the 22FS was to disband, while the 81st and 23rd to remain as is?

_________________
Best regards
Niels

http://s587.photobucket.com/albums/ss316/NC-Boman/
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
vegasfalconfixer
PostPosted: Apr 07, 2010 - 03:43 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Aug 23, 2005 - 09:49 PM
Posts: 45
Location: RAF Alconbury, United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Yeah, that was the original plan, which changed late last year. They decided to reactivate the 480th because of the history associated with the unit. Makes you wonder if it's worth the expense with all the changes that will have to be made. Oh well, Spang never made sense anyway, so why start now?

_________________
Jeremy
Hill 96-00
Osan 00-01
Nellis 01-05
Kunsan 05-06
Spang 06-10
RAF Alconbury (Postal!) Pres-??
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Siesta
PostPosted: Apr 07, 2010 - 04:25 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: May 02, 2004 - 07:18 AM
Posts: 311

Status: Offline
In 1992 the 52TFW had the 23TFS, 81TFS, and the 480TFS ... from what I had gathered when the deactivation of the 480TFS then was because the other two had the history. I believe the 22nd was added after the 53TFS F-15Cs left Spangdelham. Since then the 22nd, 23rd, and 81st have flown combat missions during OAF, OIF, and OEF. So you wonder why not just keep the 23FS.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
vegasfalconfixer
PostPosted: Apr 07, 2010 - 05:18 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Aug 23, 2005 - 09:49 PM
Posts: 45
Location: RAF Alconbury, United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Very true Siesta. That was the plan when the talks first started. Deactivate the 22, keep the 23. No idea why they decided to change it, if for no other reason to make things more difficult. The Air Force is good at that sometimes!

_________________
Jeremy
Hill 96-00
Osan 00-01
Nellis 01-05
Kunsan 05-06
Spang 06-10
RAF Alconbury (Postal!) Pres-??
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
vegasfalconfixer
PostPosted: Apr 08, 2010 - 06:34 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Aug 23, 2005 - 09:49 PM
Posts: 45
Location: RAF Alconbury, United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Just posted as Spangdahlem to lose jets, gain squadron

_________________
Jeremy
Hill 96-00
Osan 00-01
Nellis 01-05
Kunsan 05-06
Spang 06-10
RAF Alconbury (Postal!) Pres-??
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Boman
PostPosted: Apr 08, 2010 - 06:52 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 08, 2004 - 08:22 PM
Posts: 1106

Status: Offline
Thanks Vegas!

_________________
Best regards
Niels

http://s587.photobucket.com/albums/ss316/NC-Boman/
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
ViperKeeper
PostPosted: Apr 09, 2010 - 01:34 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Oct 06, 2005 - 08:32 AM
Posts: 430

Status: Offline
The 22 has more colors... So no matter what hap happend, the 23 would have been packing up. Stupid move going back to the 480th...

_________________
GERB
98-01 22nd
01-03 416th/Pro
03-04 36th
04 79th
05-08 312th
08-08 331skv
08-09 313th
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Boman
PostPosted: Apr 09, 2010 - 05:24 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 08, 2004 - 08:22 PM
Posts: 1106

Status: Offline
22FS and 23FS both have history going back to WWII, so I don't fully agre with what you say, ViperKeeper

_________________
Best regards
Niels

http://s587.photobucket.com/albums/ss316/NC-Boman/
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Siesta
PostPosted: Apr 09, 2010 - 06:08 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: May 02, 2004 - 07:18 AM
Posts: 311

Status: Offline
vegasfalconfixer wrote:
Very true Siesta. That was the plan when the talks first started. Deactivate the 22, keep the 23. No idea why they decided to change it, if for no other reason to make things more difficult. The Air Force is good at that sometimes!


Well its going to be interesting... this year there will be several squadrons being deactivated... lets see what heritage logic comes out. Example .. at Elmendorf the 43FS was replaced by the 12FS and then replaced by the 525FS all within the last 15 years. Then you see the 43FS reactivated at Tyndall. The 69FS was recently reactivated at Luke AFB.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Boman
PostPosted: Apr 09, 2010 - 08:03 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 08, 2004 - 08:22 PM
Posts: 1106

Status: Offline
Logic sucks Wink

_________________
Best regards
Niels

http://s587.photobucket.com/albums/ss316/NC-Boman/
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic