| Author |
Message |
|
juve57
|
 Posted: Feb 26, 2010 - 09:52 PM
|
 
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Dec 21, 2008 - 08:52 AM
Posts: 39
Status: Offline
|
Hi guys,
Any news about these birds ?
05 4100 AK or HO ?
06 4108 and 4110 AK 90th or 525th ?
07 4132 ghost bird ?
07 4137
07 4138
07 4142
07 4145 to 4148
07 4150
08 4151
THANKS for any update !
(nb 05 4104 now a HO bird)
http://www.f-16.net/aircraft-database/F-22 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: May 21, 2013 - 8:05 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
raameagle
|
|
Posted: Feb 26, 2010 - 10:20 PM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Aug 16, 2004 - 12:59 AM
Posts: 171
Status: Offline
|
05-4100 is still marked AK but may be on its way to HO? It is currently at Nellis on Red Flag!
Regards
Mark |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raptor_DCTR
|
|
Posted: Feb 26, 2010 - 11:31 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: May 23, 2005 - 03:13 AM
Posts: 661
Status: Offline
|
|
juve57 wrote:
Hi guys,
Any news about these birds ?
05 4100 AK or HO ?
06 4108 and 4110 AK 90th or 525th ?
07 4132 ghost bird ?
07 4137
07 4138
07 4142
07 4145 to 4148
07 4150
08 4151
THANKS for any update !
(nb 05 4104 now a HO bird)
4108 and 4110 are 525 birds. 4137-4151 are 90th jets. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asif
|
|
Posted: Feb 27, 2010 - 12:37 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor
Joined: Aug 23, 2003 - 01:02 PM
Posts: 2799
|
| Thanks for the updates. Anymore, please add here. |
_________________
Asif Shamim
F-16.net Editorial staff & Patch Gallery Administration
|
|
|
|
|
|
raameagle
|
|
Posted: Feb 27, 2010 - 01:12 AM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Aug 16, 2004 - 12:59 AM
Posts: 171
Status: Offline
|
Is 4151 FY07 or FY08 please?
Regards
Mark |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
geogen
|
|
Posted: Feb 27, 2010 - 03:21 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K
Joined: Mar 11, 2008 - 03:28 PM
Posts: 2804
Location: 45 km offshore, New England
Status: Offline
|
For the record; especially given the premature shut-down of F-22 fleet procurement, I have a personal problem with annoucing and updating play-by-play, strategic F-22 tail numbers and deployments, etc...
Perhaps USAF would concur? Maybe I'm just misreading it. |
_________________
The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
|
|
|
|
|
|
checksixx
|
|
Posted: Feb 27, 2010 - 04:03 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Jul 20, 2005 - 05:28 AM
Posts: 1305
Status: Offline
|
| Everyone already knows how many are being produced and tail (code/block) numbers are public domain...especially considering both the Air Force and Lockheed Martin release them and sometimes update that information online. No one has posted anything concerning deployments here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raptor_DCTR
|
|
Posted: Feb 27, 2010 - 04:16 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: May 23, 2005 - 03:13 AM
Posts: 661
Status: Offline
|
| There's nothing "strategic" about tail numbers. If this were the case then why aren't we concerned about the extensive F-16 tail number data base on here? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
geogen
|
|
Posted: Feb 27, 2010 - 04:19 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K
Joined: Mar 11, 2008 - 03:28 PM
Posts: 2804
Location: 45 km offshore, New England
Status: Offline
|
I'm just suggesting that perhaps we should wait(?) for USAF to make those numbers 'public' as you say, and not try to advise ourselves beforehand?
Absolutely there is a tactical interest, regarding the actual tail-number/inter-squadron changing??
Especially with a preamature shut-down, small number combat-coded force to work with.. Thats all. |
_________________
The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raptor_DCTR
|
|
Posted: Feb 27, 2010 - 04:58 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: May 23, 2005 - 03:13 AM
Posts: 661
Status: Offline
|
| There's no difference knowing Raptor tail numbers compared to Vipers or eagles or warthogs....... Numbers of PAI have nothing to do with it. Like checksixx said, LM and the AIR FORCE its self have already released tail numbers and locations. Nothing was posted about deployments or TDYs or anything of that sort. Not to mention strategic and tactical are two totally different things. And no, knowing tail numbers at bases is not going to be a huge strategic loss for us and lose the war. What the Air Force doesn't tell you is what tail numbers are where at any one time (spares, loans, BAI) and what they're doing there. That's where things differ. Knowing which tails are assigned to which base is not an issue. If the Air Force didn't want you to know assigned bases/tail nubers, there would be no base codes OR serial numbers painted on the tails. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
juve57
|
|
Posted: Feb 28, 2010 - 09:03 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Dec 21, 2008 - 08:52 AM
Posts: 39
Status: Offline
|
Hi,
seen on FENCE CHECK website, 05-4104 with HO markings (RED FLAG 10)
and what happens with 07-4132 ? Impossible finding markings ...
thanks for your hepl !! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
raameagle
|
|
Posted: Feb 28, 2010 - 11:44 AM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Aug 16, 2004 - 12:59 AM
Posts: 171
Status: Offline
|
I believe 07-4132 to be at Edwards but no visual confirmation yet.
Regards
Mark |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elliboom
|
|
Posted: Feb 28, 2010 - 08:42 PM
|
|
|
Senior member
Joined: Apr 05, 2006 - 07:21 PM
Posts: 426
Location: Lincoln, NE
Status: Offline
|
| Here's confimation of 4104 being an HO bird |
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
2.41 MB |
| Viewed: |
54668 Time(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asif
|
|
Posted: Feb 28, 2010 - 09:14 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor
Joined: Aug 23, 2003 - 01:02 PM
Posts: 2799
|
|
Elliboom wrote:
Here's confimation of 4104 being an HO bird
Which Squadron she gone to as the badge has been painted over. |
_________________
Asif Shamim
F-16.net Editorial staff & Patch Gallery Administration
|
|
|
|
|
|
checksixx
|
|
Posted: Mar 01, 2010 - 07:31 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Jul 20, 2005 - 05:28 AM
Posts: 1305
Status: Offline
|
| The Holloman crew have been getting some of Langley's jets as Langley recieves new Raptors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Private Messages
Forum Guidelines
