| Author |
Message |
|
vegasdave901
|
Posted: Feb 02, 2010 - 03:07 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Dec 31, 2007 - 11:08 AM
Posts: 226
Status: Offline
|
| Just occured to me watching a Nova on JSF. Why was the JSF X-32 v X-35 but the fighter competition was YF-22 v YF-23? I know that X is experimental and YF is prototype figher, but what's the diff. I'm missing? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Jun 20, 2013 - 11:04 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
LinkF16SimDude
|
Posted: Feb 02, 2010 - 04:18 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Jan 31, 2004 - 07:18 PM
Posts: 2367
Status: Offline
|
Dunno. Was it maybe because the ATF prototypes were built with DoD funds (and hence the military designations) but the JSF prototypes were built with contractor funds?  |
_________________ Why does "monosyllabic" have 5 syllables?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
f22enthusiast
|
Posted: Feb 02, 2010 - 04:52 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Oct 16, 2008 - 10:41 PM
Posts: 130
Status: Offline
|
| X usually means Experimental Prototype whereas Y means Service Test. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
fiskerwad
|
Posted: Feb 02, 2010 - 05:14 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Nov 13, 2004 - 07:43 PM
Posts: 712
Location: 76101
|
|
|
|
 |
|
cywolf32
|
Posted: Feb 02, 2010 - 05:40 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Nov 21, 2005 - 12:04 PM
Posts: 616
Location: USA
Status: Offline
|
"The JSF Concept Demonstration Program is not meant to be a competitive fly-off. The Boeing JSF X-32 and Lockheed Martin JSF X-35 are not prototypes – they are technology demonstrators, hence the "X" designation, as opposed to the "Y" designation used for aircraft such as the YF-22 and the YF-23 (prototypes for the F-22). Both Boeing X-32 aircraft demonstrate how highly common variants of the same aircraft can be designed and built on a single product line."
From global security |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|