Forum: F-16 News

Challenge ends mechanic's long career at Hill AFB



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   1, 2  Next
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
Gamera
PostPosted: Jan 29, 2010 - 11:21 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: May 23, 2005 - 08:54 AM
Posts: 663

Status: Offline
Quote:
Challenge ends mechanic's long career at Hill AFB

Updated: 01/25/2010 09:50:07 AM MST
By Matthew D. LaPlante
The Salt Lake Tribune


Air Force » Phantom malfunction likely in jet's wiring eludes veteran of 44 years.

or Rick Hurtado, it was one final challenge.

After 44 years in the Air Force, Hurtado was ready to retire. But first, the master mechanic's supervisors asked him to look at a F-16 fighter jet that was alerting its pilots to a dangerous malfunction.

The problem was first noticed in 2006 in the skies over Europe, where aircraft 90-0419 was a part of the 23rd Fighter Squadron -- the Fighting Hawks of Spangdahlem Air Base in Germany.

"Warning. Warning. Warning," the jet's computer-simulated voice -- known not so affectionately as "Bitching Betty" -- alerted her pilot.

A code in the aircraft's display panel indicated that the jet was having engine problems. But the alert persisted even after Air Force maintainers switched out the aircraft's powerful F100 turbofan engine. The problem was a phantom, they concluded -- likely caused by a problem somewhere in the jet's wiring.

Still, in a single-engine aircraft, that warning could not be ignored. The $19 million jet fighter was grounded over a wiring problem that might cost a few hundreds dollars to fix -- if only someone could figure out where the problem was coming from.

The aircraft was broken down, packed into crates, and shipped to Hill Air Force Base in Utah.

That's where Hurtado first saw her.

The agile F-16 Fighting Falcon runs just 50 feet from nose to tail. But under its aluminum alloy skin are miles and miles of twisted and bundled wiring.

"The problem could be anywhere," said Greg Hoffman, Hill's maintenance director. "It was going to be a great challenge."

Hoffman knew 419's potential. He had first met that jet while serving with the 23rd years earlier in Germany. "I'd never had any problems with that jet," he said. "It was a good bird. And if there was a guy in the world that could get her back in the air, it was Rick Hurtado."

Day by day, wire by wire, Hurtado and his team of mechanics sifted through 419's innards. "It was more a process of elimination than anything," he said.

At one point in 2009, the team was convinced it had solved the problem. But as a test pilot pulled the aircraft out of a touch-and-go on Hill's long runway, Betty returned.

"Warning. Warning. Warning," she cried.

Hurtado went back to work. Often, the 61-year-old mechanic would draw up a wiring diagram and bring it home to study.

"I'd sit down there in my little office in my basement and study the drawings," he said.

Sometimes he fell asleep hunched over the papers at his desk.

Hurtado believes he was weeks away from solving the puzzle when word came from the Air Force's F-16 program office to stand down. A Lockheed Martin facility in Fort Worth needed a few airframes to conduct structural fatigue testing -- and 419 was a good candidate.

"The idea is to figure out, as we fly these airplanes longer and longer, what might fail on them structurally," Hoffman explained.

In that way, he said, the sacrifice of 419 might help other maintainers keep hundreds of jets in the air for years to come.

But that didn't make it easy to break the news to Hurtado.

"He was really disappointed," Hoffman said. "He felt like he was right on the cusp of solving this riddle. And I believe him."

Hurtado said it was difficult to accept the order.

"It was a real bitter pill," he said. "I've never failed to repair a broken aircraft. But on this one I just ran out of time."

In a career that began during the Vietnam War, Hurtado said that not being able to fix 419 "was my only real disappointment."

"I was hoping to see her fly again," said Hurtado, who retired in December. "But sometimes, I guess, you've just got to let things go."

Source: http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_14241222?source=rss


(Hmm. The www.f-16.net database doesn't have "90-0419". It has 78-0419, 79-0419, 88-0419, 91-0419, and 92-0419.)
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 24, 2013 - 4:55 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
JoeSambor
PostPosted: Jan 29, 2010 - 05:57 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Dec 28, 2004 - 05:56 AM
Posts: 751

Status: Offline
It is 91-0419. Lovely story by the newspaper reporter, except that the failure was not a PFL, and did not light up the caution lights or Bitching Betty.

Further, everybody associated with this aircraft thought that it could be fixed. Some bean counter somewhere gave up on it. I would have liked a crack at it too.

I know and respect Col Greg Hoffman, even though he is a Warthog guy at heart, he knows his F-16s.

Best Regards,

_________________
Joe Sambor
LM Aero Field Service Engineer
Woensdrecht Logistics Center, The Netherlands
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
discofishing
PostPosted: Jan 30, 2010 - 12:54 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Nov 07, 2008 - 10:15 PM
Posts: 1280

Status: Offline
Wow, the USAF gave up on that aircraft because of a cable or wire?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
03fomoco
PostPosted: Jan 30, 2010 - 03:41 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Nov 07, 2007 - 03:12 AM
Posts: 73

Status: Offline
Man what a kick in the nads for the maintenance community. Why do I have a feeling that this jet died behind a desk by a pencil from someone who could not name 10 items on a 16?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
discofishing
PostPosted: Jan 30, 2010 - 08:16 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Nov 07, 2008 - 10:15 PM
Posts: 1280

Status: Offline
The sad thing is that it's probably a wire with an intermittent short somewhere and would cost like 50 cents to repair with a splice kit. With all the money they spent trying to fix this aircraft I wonder why they didn't just replace all the wires/cables associated with that system.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
vegasfalconfixer
PostPosted: Apr 07, 2010 - 04:52 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Aug 23, 2005 - 09:49 PM
Posts: 45
Location: RAF Alconbury, United Kingdom
Status: Offline
We worked that jet for months and months at Spang, then I was part of the crew that had to drive up to SABCA 7 or 8 times to reclass/declass the jet for the Belgians to work on it. It was sad seeing the jet never get fixed. A lot of good maintainers spent a lot of man-hours trying to find this ghost. We most certainly didn't give up on it.

_________________
Jeremy
Hill 96-00
Osan 00-01
Nellis 01-05
Kunsan 05-06
Spang 06-10
RAF Alconbury (Postal!) Pres-??
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
discofishing
PostPosted: Apr 08, 2010 - 12:33 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Nov 07, 2008 - 10:15 PM
Posts: 1280

Status: Offline
So the USAF gave up on this aircraft because of a wire? If so, that's really sad. They should've just run new wires.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
discofishing
PostPosted: Apr 08, 2010 - 12:48 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Nov 07, 2008 - 10:15 PM
Posts: 1280

Status: Offline
So the USAF gave up on this aircraft because of a wire? If so, that's really sad. They should've just run new wires.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
vegasfalconfixer
PostPosted: Apr 08, 2010 - 11:29 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Aug 23, 2005 - 09:49 PM
Posts: 45
Location: RAF Alconbury, United Kingdom
Status: Offline
We ran new wires and changed parts, the Belgians did the same, Ogden Depot did the same. I guess it just wasn't cost effective anymore to keep troubleshooting it. That issue was worked for the better part of the first two years I was at Spang.

_________________
Jeremy
Hill 96-00
Osan 00-01
Nellis 01-05
Kunsan 05-06
Spang 06-10
RAF Alconbury (Postal!) Pres-??
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
discofishing
PostPosted: Apr 10, 2010 - 02:56 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Nov 07, 2008 - 10:15 PM
Posts: 1280

Status: Offline
Getting rid of the aircraft was a HUGE mistake, good job USAF. If a similar fault happens on another bird, nobody will know where to start looking. Overall, my hat is off to the troops for giving it their best effort. I bet this fault will rear its ugly head somewhere else on some other aircraft.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
fiskerwad
PostPosted: Apr 10, 2010 - 04:26 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Nov 13, 2004 - 07:43 PM
Posts: 706
Location: 76101
I remember hearing the story of a very early F-16 that kept throwing SMS mux bus errors during DD-250 selloff. The line tried changing everything until it flew a clean flight and went to Hill. At Hill, the same problem surfaced and Hill finally chased it to a fastener that had nicked a wing harness during manufacture causing mux switching and generating the 9 max MUX MFLs.
Wiring problems are always a headache.
fisk
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
discofishing
PostPosted: Apr 10, 2010 - 08:37 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Nov 07, 2008 - 10:15 PM
Posts: 1280

Status: Offline
Yes wire problems are a headache, but I just loved tearing into a wire harness and fixing damage done by a heavy caliber round or chasing down an intermittent short or open. It feels so awesome to fix a 1553 problem (or something) not even Boeing engineers could figure out. Based on my Army experience with AH-64Ds, my biggest headache was the maintenance officers who never wanted me to run new wires, they just wanted splice after splice, which goes against the Tri-Service Wire Bible (and creates higher line resistance which will create problems later on). Another big headache was mechanics, they are mortal enemies of electrical/avionics techs. They tear into aircraft to R/R components with little regard for wires and cables, and that causes all sorts of faults and failures at all the wrong times. I am guessing this specific F-16 mentioned in the thread was a victim of some mechanic not watching what he/she was doing and slightly damaged a wire somewhere. I hope I am wrong, for I have seen wire faults straight from the factory. This reminds me of the saying I would tell my troops, "an aircraft is only as good as those who maintain and operate it." I don't know where it came from, but is a fact of life.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
VarkVet
PostPosted: Apr 11, 2010 - 12:33 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Oct 30, 2006 - 04:31 AM
Posts: 1442

Status: Offline
From article:

"Warning. Warning. Warning," the jet's computer-simulated voice -- known not so affectionately as "Bitching Betty" -- alerted her pilot.
A code in the aircraft's display panel indicated that the jet was having engine problems. But the alert persisted even after Air Force maintainers switched out the aircraft's powerful F100 turbofan engine. The problem was a phantom, they concluded -- likely caused by a problem somewhere in the jet's wiring"

Problem solved ... If you have a F100 in a block 50, EMSC will surely pick-up nuisance data Laughing

_________________
My eyes have seen the glory of the Lord and the esthetics of the Flightline
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
discofishing
PostPosted: Apr 11, 2010 - 04:10 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Nov 07, 2008 - 10:15 PM
Posts: 1280

Status: Offline
EMSC? I don't care what aircraft it is or how advanced it is advertised as, there's always going to be intermittent faults. BITs help, but aircraft don't troubleshoot themselves.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
VarkVet
PostPosted: Apr 11, 2010 - 04:15 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Oct 30, 2006 - 04:31 AM
Posts: 1442

Status: Offline
discofishing wrote:
EMSC? I don't care what aircraft it is or how advanced it is advertised as, there's always going to be intermittent faults. BITs help, but aircraft don't troubleshoot themselves.


I concur, and wire chaffing will always be an issue!

by the way ... no follow on maint. with EMSC R&I if I remember correctly. I find that strange?

_________________
My eyes have seen the glory of the Lord and the esthetics of the Flightline
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic