| Author |
Message |
|
hobojet
|
Posted: Nov 01, 2008 - 05:53 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Aug 07, 2008 - 06:03 PM
Posts: 82
Status: Offline
|
there have been many topics about wether we need to buy more f-22's, but lets settle this right now with a poll. Does america really need a stealth fighter at this very moment...or can/should America wait and spend this money els where.
If this question has already been answered or has already been decided by the government please tell for I havn't been able to do much because I've been so busy. |
_________________ reno air races woohoo!!! if anyone fly's in them let me know and I'll root you on. haha!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 20, 2013 - 12:30 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
afnsucks
|
Posted: Nov 01, 2008 - 02:07 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Jun 16, 2006 - 11:59 PM
Posts: 221
Status: Offline
|
| Easy peezy lemon squeezy. Of course America needs more F-22s. The more the better. Simple fact: at one point in time people were saying we don't need F-16s we have the F-4 lets just spent more money on F-4s and upgrade them we don't need F-16s. |
_________________ AMERICA: numba 1 best!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sferrin
|
Posted: Nov 01, 2008 - 03:08 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 22, 2005 - 04:23 AM
Posts: 1613
Status: Offline
|
No, because everybody knows F-15s have infinite airframe hours.  |
_________________ "There I was. . ."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Master-of-Disaster
|
Posted: Nov 01, 2008 - 03:38 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: May 08, 2005 - 10:26 PM
Posts: 104
Status: Offline
|
|
sferrin wrote:
No, because everybody knows F-15s have infinite airframe hours.
... just like the invincible jigsaw puzzle. |
_________________ When flying, always make sure the pointy end goes forward.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
npad
|
Posted: Nov 01, 2008 - 04:36 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: May 21, 2007 - 04:05 PM
Posts: 19
Status: Offline
|
....Does America really need a stealth fighter at this very momentor can/should America waitand spend this money else where?...
I'm no expert but this sounds like a loaded question. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SpudmanWP
|
Posted: Nov 01, 2008 - 07:11 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4266
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
|
npad wrote:
....Does America really need a stealth fighter at this very momentor can/should America waitand spend this money else where?...
I'm no expert but this sounds like a loaded question.
If you wait then they will not be there when you NEED them.
They will also cost a lot more when you do decide to build them.
You do not plan & equip an military for the enemy you have, but for the enemy you "might have" in the future. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Hookturn
|
Posted: Nov 01, 2008 - 07:21 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Oct 27, 2004 - 10:49 AM
Posts: 70
|
Does the USAF need more F-22s? Yes.
Does the US people afford to give more F-22s to the USAF? No. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Beazz
|
Posted: Nov 01, 2008 - 07:48 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Sep 15, 2007 - 08:19 PM
Posts: 465
Status: Offline
|
|
Hookturn wrote:
Does the USAF need more F-22s? Yes.
Does the US people afford to give more F-22s to the USAF? No.
If *we the people* can afford to give wallstreet 1 trillion bucks, then YES we can certainly afford to give the USAF another 50Bil and let em get another 300 or so F22s and max out the production line to the 30+ LM said they could do before the country goes broke. If we are gonna go broke, I'd prefer to have every possible peace of military hardware that can be humanly made before it happens. We're gonna need it! |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SixerViper
|
Posted: Nov 02, 2008 - 02:03 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Jun 05, 2007 - 09:32 PM
Posts: 442
Status: Offline
|
| Does America need more F-22s? In one word: YES!! |
_________________ F-106A/B '69-'73
F-105D/F '73-'81
A-7D/K '81-'91
F-16C/D '91-'05
SCUBA bum '05-Present
|
|
|
|
 |
|
geogen
|
Posted: Nov 02, 2008 - 02:29 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Mar 11, 2008 - 03:28 PM
Posts: 2804
Location: 45 km offshore, New England
Status: Offline
|
Hobojet:
You should have included one more vote option:
USAF needs at least 100 more F-22, plus something better to fill additional strategic deterrent roles such as FB-22xx.
YES [x] box checked. |
_________________ The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
hobojet
|
Posted: Nov 02, 2008 - 05:32 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Aug 07, 2008 - 06:03 PM
Posts: 82
Status: Offline
|
| you all have good points...well some of you anyway. But I think I agree mostly with geogen. If you too agree with geogen then just do this: [x]. If you don't then vote in the poll |
_________________ reno air races woohoo!!! if anyone fly's in them let me know and I'll root you on. haha!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
parrothead
|
Posted: Nov 02, 2008 - 08:08 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 11, 2004 - 12:04 AM
Posts: 3280
Status: Offline
|
| Air dominance is the only acceptable position in a conflict. If air dominance is possible but leaders decide that parity is enough then those leaders should be held personally accountable. |
_________________ No plane on Sunday, maybe be one come Monday...
www.parrotheadjeff.com
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Master-of-Disaster
|
Posted: Nov 02, 2008 - 12:51 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: May 08, 2005 - 10:26 PM
Posts: 104
Status: Offline
|
[x]
A nation like the US should always be prepared to fight and defeat any enemy, any time, any where.
And also keep in mind: the only fair fight is the one you win!
So yes: the USAF should get more F-22's, and yes: something should be developped to replace F-15E's, B-1B's, B-52's, even the B-2's.
Because none of those will last forever. |
_________________ When flying, always make sure the pointy end goes forward.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SpudmanWP
|
Posted: Nov 02, 2008 - 04:21 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4266
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
|
Master-of-Disaster wrote:
[x]
A nation like the US should always be prepared to fight and defeat any enemy, any time, any where.
And also keep in mind: the only fair fight is the one you win!
So yes: the USAF should get more F-22's, and yes: something should be developped to replace F-15E's, B-1B's, B-52's, even the B-2's.
Because none of those will last forever.
It's called the 2018 Bomber program |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
f16crewchief03
|
Posted: Nov 02, 2008 - 04:45 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jun 20, 2006 - 01:44 AM
Posts: 30
Status: Offline
|
| I would have to say YES we need them!!! We need a change to the AF inventory and it needs to be one that meets multiple roles and the F-22 is just the change we need. And of course, the sooner we get them the better. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|