Forum: F-16 Armament & Stores

Raid At An Aircraft Carrier



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
yasirbhojani
PostPosted: Nov 12, 2009 - 05:57 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Mar 17, 2008 - 07:07 PM
Posts: 218

Status: Offline
Hello,
If a formation of F-16s, lets say 20 F-16s are required to raid an aircraft carrier in two waves, what could be the best possible configurations and which weapons and pods would be the most effective from these ?

Gbu-10, Gbu-12, Gbu-24, Gbu-28, Gbu-31, Gbu-38, JSOW, Cbu-87, Mk-82, Maverick, Harm, Penguin, Harpoon, ALQ-184 Pod, Litening-III pod, Sniper XR.

_________________
Regards
Yasir Bhojani
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Sep 03, 2010 - 3:16 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
gosmack
PostPosted: Nov 12, 2009 - 07:47 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Mar 29, 2009 - 06:41 PM
Posts: 59
Location: Sioux City, IA
Status: Offline
Are these Venezuelan F-16's? If so, I am not sure if they even have 20 operational.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Mechanic
PostPosted: Nov 12, 2009 - 07:56 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Jun 05, 2008 - 06:15 PM
Posts: 65

Status: Offline
Harpoon? The one that is made to sink ships and has longest range? Add some gas, ECM and lot of prayers.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
LinkF16SimDude
PostPosted: Nov 12, 2009 - 07:56 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jan 31, 2004 - 07:18 PM
Posts: 1963

Status: Offline
Chavez's remaining Vipers couldn't even integrate with most of that stuff. Let alone shoot it successfully. Wink

_________________
Why does "monosyllabic" have 5 syllables?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
yasirbhojani
PostPosted: Nov 12, 2009 - 08:24 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Mar 17, 2008 - 07:07 PM
Posts: 218

Status: Offline
Quote:

Harpoon? The one that is made to sink ships and has longest range? Add some gas, ECM and lot of prayers.


Very Happy Good one. But,my question still remains unanswered. And, by the way, I am talking about F-16C/D Block 52's. I am sure they can integrate all of the above mentioned weapons and pods.
So, any idea how should the formations be set and/or the division of aircrafts in two different waves ?

_________________
Regards
Yasir Bhojani
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
TC
PostPosted: Nov 12, 2009 - 09:13 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Moderator
F-16.net Moderator


Joined: Jan 14, 2004 - 07:06 AM
Posts: 3886

Status: Offline
Hate to crash the party here, but talk about formations, attack profiles, and the armament used during the attack, deals with tactics. Tactics are, and shall remain, classified.

What troubles me, is that I've been noticing a trend towards these type of discussions as of late, and it involves some usual suspects. Questions seem to deal with armament loadouts, aircraft range with specific loads, attack profiles using certain types of armament, and the formations and/or tactics used. All of this information is classified.

Anyone who does know this information should keep his mouth shut, or, fingers off of the keyboard, if you will.

Anyone who gives this information over an open internet forum is committing a crime, and yes, those laws do also apply to our international friends. If necessary, this site can and will turn the offending party's information over to the proper authorities, and you will be prosecuted.

Remember, Big Brother is real and he really is watching you. Be careful, and watch what you say and type!

_________________
"He counted on America to be passive...He counted wrong." -- President Ronald Reagan
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Guysmiley
PostPosted: Nov 12, 2009 - 09:22 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: May 26, 2005 - 08:39 PM
Posts: 1469

Like Mechanic said, I think a mass volley of Harpoons would be your best bet. Free fall munitions aren't going to do you diddly squat against a carrier battle group. Or are you talking about a mythical lone carrier floating all by itself with no escorts or air wing?

*edit*

Agreed, TC. People who have a need to know shouldn't be talking about anything resembling real world tactics. My experience in naval warfare is limited to the Harpoon series of games. Smile
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
yasirbhojani
PostPosted: Nov 12, 2009 - 10:01 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Mar 17, 2008 - 07:07 PM
Posts: 218

Status: Offline
Quote:

Hate to crash the party here, but talk about formations, attack profiles, and the armament used during the attack, deals with tactics. Tactics are, and shall remain, classified.

What troubles me, is that I've been noticing a trend towards these type of discussions as of late, and it involves some usual suspects. Questions seem to deal with armament loadouts, aircraft range with specific loads, attack profiles using certain types of armament, and the formations and/or tactics used. All of this information is classified.

Anyone who does know this information should keep his mouth shut, or, fingers off of the keyboard, if you will.

Anyone who gives this information over an open internet forum is committing a crime, and yes, those laws do also apply to our international friends. If necessary, this site can and will turn the offending party's information over to the proper authorities, and you will be prosecuted.

Remember, Big Brother is real and he really is watching you. Be careful, and watch what you say and type!




Oh. In that case, I am sorry. Forget that I ever asked it. Sorry again.

_________________
Regards
Yasir Bhojani
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Siesta
PostPosted: Nov 12, 2009 - 11:01 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: May 02, 2004 - 07:18 AM
Posts: 248

Status: Offline
I'm going to chime in and say over the years I been here - it just cracks me up on what questions are asked. All this probing - and if people were smart enough all the questions are actually answered in open sources either through books or DVDs or other websites. or Falcon4.

What cracks me up equally is this threat of big brother is watching and anything remotely revealed as an OPSEC issue is going to be reported. I think the people that have asked over and over do not need a warning anymore and its time that those who feel obligated to report these people posting do so.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
That_Engine_Guy
PostPosted: Nov 12, 2009 - 11:33 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Dec 14, 2005 - 05:03 AM
Posts: 1698

Status: Offline
Good luck with that!

I don't know if you're planning on enough fighters; and if you did would you be willing to loose so many?

I wouldn't try it. Big No No

REF: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Carri ... operations
Don't know how accurate wiki is on this topic, but good reading. You may try some 'public' NAVY sites. The USN likes to boast how secure the modern Carrier Group is.

Keep 'em flyin' Thumb
TEG



800px-Abraham-Lincoln-battlegroup.jpg
 Description:
The ships don't sail this close during combat, but gives you an idea of what you'd have to fight through starting with the CAP 160 to 180 nautical miles (300 to 330 km) out!
 Filesize:  113.1 KB
 Viewed:  1576 Time(s)

800px-Abraham-Lincoln-battlegroup.jpg



_________________
[Airplanes are] near perfect, all they lack is the ability to forgive.
— Richard Collins
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2010 Lieven Dewitte and Stefaan Vanhastel