| Author |
Message |
|
SnakeHandler
|
Posted: Mar 20, 2010 - 01:56 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jul 01, 2007 - 07:22 PM
Posts: 620
|
| So when do we see it short takeoff, supersonic dash and vertical land? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Jun 20, 2013 - 8:03 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Ztex
|
Posted: Mar 20, 2010 - 04:15 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Dec 13, 2006 - 05:17 PM
Posts: 181
Status: Offline
|
|
spazsinbad wrote:
. 'I could be todally rong but I'm a dancing fool...' (Frank Zappa).
Yowza, yowza, yowza! |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SpudmanWP
|
Posted: Mar 20, 2010 - 06:03 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4348
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
|
lb wrote:
The new estimate is an average cost of $114 to $135 million:
It's the same estimate, just in "Then Year" dollars (ie with inflation included).
I really wish you people would do a little research instead of jumping on every 'doom and gloom' article that comes out. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
energo
|
Posted: Mar 23, 2010 - 10:45 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Moderator

Joined: Dec 09, 2007 - 02:06 PM
Posts: 466
Status: Offline
|
|
SpudmanWP wrote:
lb wrote:
The new estimate is an average cost of $114 to $135 million:
It's the same estimate, just in "Then Year" dollars (ie with inflation included).
Then Year 2012-2014 according to Defensenews.
B. Bolsøy
Oslo |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
beepa
|
Posted: Mar 24, 2010 - 06:52 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Jan 05, 2007 - 10:36 PM
Posts: 163
Status: Offline
|
| Thanks for the updates and all your hard work energo!!...It's people like yourself and the rest of the F16.net crew that keep me coming back, although lately it's been a gauntlet of trolls to pass before I can see the forest. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
bumtish
|
Posted: Mar 26, 2010 - 10:10 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Nov 14, 2008 - 03:59 PM
Posts: 218
Status: Offline
|
|
energo wrote:
SpudmanWP wrote:
lb wrote:
The new estimate is an average cost of $114 to $135 million:
It's the same estimate, just in "Then Year" dollars (ie with inflation included).
Then Year 2012-2014 according to Defensenews.
B. Bolsøy
Oslo
The only then year dollar year being (publically)operated with within the JSF program is TY2034 dollars, being the last planned year of vehicle procurement.
Defensenews also got it wrong as the deliveries in 2010-2014 are not at APUC, but at the specific cost for these years.
Check lb' post at bottom of the previous page.
Then year dollars are not inflation adjusted.  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
lb
|
Posted: Jun 04, 2010 - 12:01 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Feb 02, 2010 - 04:30 AM
Posts: 241
Location: USA
Status: Offline
|
| Actually the new estimate is $155 million TY or $112 million in 2002 dollars PAUC. For average procurement cost the new estimate is $133 million or $92 million in 2002 dollars. Here is Dr Carter's June 1st letter to Congress and a CBO study that was just released and is not getting much attention as of yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Asif
|
Posted: Jun 06, 2010 - 09:26 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Aug 23, 2003 - 01:02 PM
Posts: 2801
|
F-35C CF-01 makes first taxi tests May 28, 2010
 Lockheed Martin test pilot Jeff Knowles takes the first F-35C, called CF-1, on its first taxi test at Lockheed Martins' Fort Worth facility on May 28th, 2010. |
_________________ Asif Shamim
F-16.net Editorial staff & Patch Gallery Administration
|
|
|
|
 |
|
energo
|
Posted: Mar 25, 2011 - 12:47 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Moderator

Joined: Dec 09, 2007 - 02:06 PM
Posts: 466
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SpudmanWP
|
Posted: Mar 25, 2011 - 04:16 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4348
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
Cool find... I've added that site to my daily list.  |
_________________ "The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
neptune
|
Posted: Mar 25, 2011 - 06:40 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Oct 24, 2008 - 01:03 AM
Posts: 1165
Location: Houston
Status: Offline
|
|
energo wrote:
Source: http://f-35.ca/2011/f-35-weekly-update- ... h-24-2011/
Thursday, March 24th, 2011
F-35 Weekly Update – March 24, 2011
A Message from Larry Lawson
.... AF-3 resumed flight ops for a functional check of the newly installed Mission Systems software and hardware, and returned Code One.
.....
Kudos to the team for Code One. It's a "Big Deal" to get this mod. effort working for LO, a path forward for all F-35s.  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
neptune
|
Posted: Mar 25, 2011 - 06:50 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Oct 24, 2008 - 01:03 AM
Posts: 1165
Location: Houston
Status: Offline
|
|
energo wrote:
Source: http://f-35.ca/2011/f-35-weekly-update- ... h-24-2011/
Thursday, March 24th, 2011
F-35 Weekly Update – March 24, 2011
....This week, the Fort Worth team is hosting a series of high level visitors including the acting Deputy Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, Mr. Dave van Buren; the USAF Commander of the Air Education and Training Center, Gen. Ed Rice; and Lt. Gen. Terry Robling..
It'd be nice to see if a "Bee" (VL or not) could join the Admirals and Generals at The Navy League’s Sea-Air-Space Exposition in Arlington, Va.; 12 April; if the SDD schedule permits.  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SpudmanWP
|
Posted: Mar 28, 2011 - 07:55 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4348
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
F-35 ahead of schedule, even after generator failure.
http://www.lexingtoninstitute.org/f-35- ... amp;c=1171
Quote:
Author: Loren B. Thompson, Ph.D.
Date: Monday, March 28, 2011
Flight tests of the tri-service F-35 Joint Strike Fighter are running well ahead of the plan for 2011, with 181 flights completed as of March 25 against a plan of 133. In addition, the productivity of each flight test is increasing, with an average of 7.7 unique test points achieved per flight. The combination of additional test flights above plan and greater-than-expected productivity per flight has enabled the overall test program to complete 1,310 test points -- far above the number of 899 planned for this stage in the testing cycle. All three variants of the F-35 are being tested, with the average aircraft performing six flights per month.
The test program might have been dealt a serious setback on March 9 when a conventional takeoff variant was forced to make an emergency landing due to a dual generator failure. Generators provide the electricity that starts the fighter's engine and powers flight controls. However, the cause of the failure was quickly traced to faulty maintenance procedures which have now been corrected, and the test fleet has returned to service. These kinds of anomalies are commonplace in tests of new aircraft.
Lockheed Martin officials are confident they can resolve problems identified in testing with several parts of the short-takeoff/vertical-landing (STOVL) version of the F-35 being developed for the Marine Corps. Among the fixes required are a strengthening of the doors above the mid-fuselage lift-fan, reinforcement of a bulkhead, and resolution of excessive heat deposition at one point near the engine exhaust. Defense secretary Robert Gates recently put the Marine variant on a two-year probationary period to make the necessary fixes, while stating the Air Force and Navy variants were progressing well.
The conventional-takeoff Air Force version will be the most heavily produced F-35, comprising over 70 percent of the domestic production run and almost all of the export sales. The Air Force plans to buy 1,763 conventional-takeoff F-35s, while the Navy and Marine Corps collectively will buy 680 of their two variants. Overseas allies are expected to buy thousands of the planes over the next three decades as they replace aging Cold War fighters and seek a low-cost solution to their requirement for a versatile and survivable tactical aircraft.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jon
|
Posted: Jul 16, 2011 - 07:35 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Nov 06, 2003 - 06:21 PM
Posts: 1374
Status: Offline
|
Hi guys
Need an update on squadrons that are for sure getting the F-35.
58th FS.... |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
luke_sandoz
|
Posted: Sep 22, 2011 - 06:22 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Feb 08, 2011 - 08:25 PM
Posts: 168
Status: Offline
|
Interesting . . .
http://f-35.ca has a 'special" Canuckistan version of the F-35 with the gun blister on the right side.
Looks like LM hired a PR firm to handle the negative press in Canada and they have goofed the image. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|