| Author |
Message |
|
kneejo
|
Posted: Oct 26, 2009 - 06:26 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Oct 25, 2009 - 01:58 PM
Posts: 7
Location: Holland
Status: Offline
|
hey guys, just got back to AF after developing a new addiction to Orbiter Spacesim (shame on me, I know ). I'm getting used to all the systems again and was wondering about the mavericks; the dust-cap needs to be removed to get a picture from the camera (U-key), but does it also need to be removed if I slave the mav to the A-G radar? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 22, 2013 - 5:26 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
DeepSpace
|
Posted: Oct 26, 2009 - 06:40 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Aug 14, 2003 - 07:26 PM
Posts: 1053
Status: Offline
|
| Yes, the cap should be removed, nevertheless the mode you use to fire it. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
gosmack
|
Posted: Oct 26, 2009 - 06:40 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Mar 29, 2009 - 06:41 PM
Posts: 62
Location: Sioux City, IA
Status: Offline
|
| Once it is uncaged. It remains uncaged. Granted if you switch weapons modes, but not radar modes, it will move to the uncapped mav. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
kneejo
|
Posted: Oct 26, 2009 - 06:43 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Oct 25, 2009 - 01:58 PM
Posts: 7
Location: Holland
Status: Offline
|
| okay, thanks. [Link pending approval] another question springs to mind, is there a way to designate multiple targets to multiple mav's, and then releasing them all at once? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
kneejo
|
Posted: Nov 11, 2009 - 06:48 AM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Oct 25, 2009 - 01:58 PM
Posts: 7
Location: Holland
Status: Offline
|
| after delving through the history of the f-16 I must apologize for the above question about designating multiple [Link pending approval] I understand this is a sensitive [Link pending approval] |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
JoeSambor
|
Posted: Nov 11, 2009 - 11:57 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Dec 28, 2004 - 05:56 AM
Posts: 751
Status: Offline
|
Actually, this very capability was a selling point of the Block 40 with LANTIRN and was heavily emphasized in LM advertising and pamphlets at the time. If I recall correctly, in the promotional video, the pilot was able to select six independent targets and take them out with one pass.
Best Regards, |
_________________ Joe Sambor
LM Aero Field Service Engineer
Woensdrecht Logistics Center, The Netherlands
|
|
|
|
 |
|
LinkF16SimDude
|
Posted: Nov 11, 2009 - 07:11 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Jan 31, 2004 - 07:18 PM
Posts: 2365
Status: Offline
|
Don't hold me to this but even pre-Block 40, I believe you could theoretically do the same thing with EO Mavs. You'd have to blow the covers off each missile you intended to shoot and have enough look time or standoff range to acquire and lock the individual targets thru each exposed seeker. Once everyone had a target you'd then launch one Mav then MSL STEP to the next until all the assigned Mavs were away. Of course, if you shot the lot you'd only be able to make one pass but it'd be a helluva pass!  |
_________________ Why does "monosyllabic" have 5 syllables?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
outlaw162
|
Posted: Nov 11, 2009 - 10:46 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Feb 28, 2008 - 02:33 AM
Posts: 968
Status: Offline
|
Not trying to be contrary here, but I seem to remember that many years ago in Block 10 A's with the EO AGM's on LAU-88's, you could not get video on the REO for the next missile, without firing, jettisoning or rejecting the active one. No multiple ACQ capability, at least back then.
It may have been a SMS/LAU-88 sequencing thing. Having only carried a TGM or a single live AGM for training, I can't speak to this sequencing from experience.
That being said, also memory is one of the first things to go. Maybe I'm thinking A-7 or F-4. It all runs together.
OL
BTW, if it was theoretically possible to do this, considering the acquisition range of the old EO versions (even with scene mag), the single cockpit workload would have been intense. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
LinkF16SimDude
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2009 - 12:52 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Jan 31, 2004 - 07:18 PM
Posts: 2365
Status: Offline
|
| Agree 100% with outlaw regarding the workload. Even if multiple locks WERE possible, getting the shots away successfully would be a stretch what with people shootin' at ya and junk. You'd almost have to have all the targets close enough to each other that you didn't have to do too much seeker slewing or movin' the jet around to lock each one. And if ya weren't careful you could lose one or more from exceeding seeker gimbal limits. Way, WAY too much stress there! |
_________________ Why does "monosyllabic" have 5 syllables?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
JoeSambor
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2009 - 12:31 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Dec 28, 2004 - 05:56 AM
Posts: 751
Status: Offline
|
I think the only way that a one-pass scenario would work is if the software was smart enough to let you acquire the target, hand it off to the Maverick, and then switch to the next one, and so on. Once the Maverick is locked on to the target, you really don't have anything to do except launch it. You would still have to pickle six times, but you could do it in one pass. Might sound crazy, but infinitely more desirable than making six passes over heavily-defended targets. No way you are going to acquire, lock, and launch six independent Mavericks on one pass, especially if you have other stuff to do.
I would think that if anyone had ever really done this in combat, we would have heard about it! For some reason the LANTIRN/Block 40 combo never really worked out. Maybe it was a change in USAF doctrine or tactics, but the low-level night attack scenario (with LANTIRN anyway) never materialized.
Mavericks were a lot of fun to check out on the ground. We used to lock up trucks, people, canopy reflections, etc. The video connections in the pylons were so bad at one time that it was common practice for the Weapons guys to jump out of the redball truck with a rubber mallet; they would tap along the pylon until the pilot told them he could see the video on the MFD.
Best Regards, |
_________________ Joe Sambor
LM Aero Field Service Engineer
Woensdrecht Logistics Center, The Netherlands
|
|
|
|
 |
|
LinkF16SimDude
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2009 - 07:14 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Jan 31, 2004 - 07:18 PM
Posts: 2365
Status: Offline
|
|
JoeSambor wrote:
No way you are going to acquire, lock, and launch six independent Mavericks on one pass, especially if you have other stuff to do.
Doug Masters could prolly do it. Oh....and maybe Chuck Norris too. Gotta have the rockin' tunes in the helmet to getcha into the zone tho.  |
_________________ Why does "monosyllabic" have 5 syllables?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|