Forum: F-22A Raptor

F-22 images



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1, 2
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
f22enthusiast
PostPosted: Oct 30, 2009 - 10:31 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Oct 16, 2008 - 10:41 PM
Posts: 117

Status: Offline
Go to Holloman AFB and check its images.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 26, 2012 - 7:20 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
avon1944
PostPosted: Oct 31, 2009 - 08:16 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Nov 24, 2004 - 02:03 AM
Posts: 387

Status: Offline
Are those bad guys MiG-29s or Su-27s? They look a little closer to MiG-29s to me.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Scorpion1alpha
PostPosted: Oct 31, 2009 - 09:04 AM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Moderator
F-16.net Moderator


Joined: Oct 21, 2005 - 01:47 AM
Posts: 1320

Status: Offline
LinkF16SimDude wrote:
To paraphrase Sam Neill from "Jurassic Park":

"And that's when the attack comes: From the two Raptors you didn't even know were there." Wink


True words, my friend.

Cheers

_________________
I'm watching...
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Scorpion1alpha
PostPosted: Oct 31, 2009 - 09:08 AM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Moderator
F-16.net Moderator


Joined: Oct 21, 2005 - 01:47 AM
Posts: 1320

Status: Offline
avon1944 wrote:
Are those bad guys MiG-29s or Su-27s? They look a little closer to MiG-29s to me.


They're MiGs Adrian.

Another interesting bit: note the Fulcrums are in afterburners, yet the Raptors are not?

Ahhh...art imitating life.

Very Happy

_________________
I'm watching...
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Neno
PostPosted: Oct 31, 2009 - 09:19 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Sep 29, 2006 - 11:35 AM
Posts: 217

Status: Offline
I don't really remember well but i think the Flankers have a little rear-looking radar.. so at that short distance they conuld'n t be sourprised .. Or maybe yes..... Twisted Evil
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
shep1978
PostPosted: Oct 31, 2009 - 02:40 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Apr 04, 2009 - 05:00 PM
Posts: 1395
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Neno wrote:
I don't really remember well but i think the Flankers have a little rear-looking radar.. so at that short distance they conuld'n t be sourprised .. Or maybe yes..... Twisted Evil


No, the rear facing radar was marketing nonsense that never happened.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Kryptid
PostPosted: Oct 31, 2009 - 08:25 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Aug 10, 2008 - 02:16 AM
Posts: 343

Status: Offline
Quote:

No, the rear facing radar was marketing nonsense that never happened.

What was the sting for, then? a RWR?

_________________
Jesus is coming soon. Be prepared for Him.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
shep1978
PostPosted: Oct 31, 2009 - 09:31 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Apr 04, 2009 - 05:00 PM
Posts: 1395
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Kryptid wrote:
Quote:

No, the rear facing radar was marketing nonsense that never happened.

What was the sting for, then? a RWR?


I have no idea but it was clear it was never going to happen, happen as in put a rear facing radar in there. Probably was a drag chute housing or something else rather mundane.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
cywolf32
PostPosted: Oct 31, 2009 - 09:33 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Nov 21, 2005 - 12:04 PM
Posts: 542
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Kryptid wrote:
Quote:

No, the rear facing radar was marketing nonsense that never happened.

What was the sting for, then? a RWR?


that's for the dragchute. Antennas are just outboard of the engines.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Kryptid
PostPosted: Nov 01, 2009 - 01:09 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Aug 10, 2008 - 02:16 AM
Posts: 343

Status: Offline
I declare that I've read that at least <i>some</i> variants of the Flanker have already had a radar implemented in the sting. Perhaps not the Su-27, but maybe the Su-30 or Su-35 have. Unfortunately, the Sukhoi homepage wasn't working the last time I tried it, so I haven't been able to find an official source to support the idea.

_________________
Jesus is coming soon. Be prepared for Him.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
shep1978
PostPosted: Nov 01, 2009 - 09:57 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Apr 04, 2009 - 05:00 PM
Posts: 1395
Location: UK
Status: Offline
I'm not sure i'd believe a word those Sukhoi people say. We've all read their nonsense claims that the Su-27 family of jets is capable of dealing wiht F-22s and we've all witnessed the ongoing disaster that is the PAK-FA program. They might, and I say might have trialed one or two jets with rear facing radar but than again who's going to take their word at face value? I sure can't.
To sum it up: To much nonsense stories from Sukhoi in the past with, as always with Sukhoi there no way of proving anything.
They could claim to have built Firefox and some people would swallow it down (I do not mean you don't gewt me wrong) and brag about what Russia has achieved.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Kryptid
PostPosted: Nov 01, 2009 - 03:13 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Aug 10, 2008 - 02:16 AM
Posts: 343

Status: Offline
Quote:

We've all read their nonsense claims that the Su-27 family of jets is capable of dealing wiht F-22s and we've all witnessed the ongoing disaster that is the PAK-FA program.

Claims about aircraft combat performance seems a bit different than claims about the equipment that the plane carries. The first is projection or speculation whereas the second should be an objective yes/no. If Sukhoi says their plane has a radar in the sting, why not believe them? It's not like it's some revolutionary new technology. If you can put an aperture in the nose, I don't see why you can't put one in the tail, too. It's not like they're saying that the sting contains a photon torpedo launcher.

If Sukhoi's word isn't good enough, perhaps some crew chiefs/mechanics that work on Flankers could confirm or deny it? I don't think there are any posting on this board, are there?

_________________
Jesus is coming soon. Be prepared for Him.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2012 F-16.net