| Author |
Message |
|
pfo
|
Posted: Oct 21, 2009 - 01:21 AM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Oct 21, 2009 - 01:12 AM
Posts: 5
|
| What is EOTS & DAS range? Is different in different sides? At front is longer than at back, left or down? |
Last edited by pfo on Oct 21, 2009 - 03:15 PM; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 26, 2012 - 7:18 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
Last edited by pfo on Oct 21, 2009 - 03:15 PM; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
 |
|
djcross
|
Posted: Oct 21, 2009 - 02:21 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Nov 10, 2005 - 01:28 AM
Posts: 55
Status: Offline
|
| Classified info. Nobody will answer. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
geogen
|
Posted: Oct 21, 2009 - 04:56 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Mar 11, 2008 - 03:28 PM
Posts: 2498
Location: 45 km offshore, New England
Status: Offline
|
pfo and all '1st time' posters on any relevant forum... it's probably smarter to first introduce yourself or at least give some of your opinions on other topics threads, before jumping right into a pretty obviously sensitive question. Sorry to be blunt if you are just an innocent kid out there with a well-intentioned, curious question.. No offense intended.
If you are interested however, there are some PowerPoint advertisements on the net depicting rough sensor ranges for both radar and passive. |
_________________ The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
nam11b
|
Posted: Oct 21, 2009 - 05:17 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: May 29, 2008 - 10:46 AM
Posts: 268
Status: Offline
|
You are way too nice geogen, I had a whole slew of smartass answers ready to go!  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
spazsinbad
|
Posted: Oct 21, 2009 - 06:33 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 4615
Location: OZ
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SpudmanWP
|
Posted: Oct 21, 2009 - 08:29 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 3321
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
Spaz, the 15 Sep 2005 Program Update and the "LOCKMART has a nice 2 page PDF" have the same hyperlink.
Nice collection.
PFO, when you have the time, I have posted all the program files (2006 forward) on the Program Docs thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
energo
|
Posted: Oct 22, 2009 - 12:12 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Moderator

Joined: Dec 09, 2007 - 02:06 PM
Posts: 445
Status: Offline
|
An idea of the EOTS's performance can be had from looking at it's predecessor, the Sniper XR/Pantera. Public sources mention identification up to 40-50 nautical miles in clear weather, but 'useful range' is considerably more according to Norwegian F-16 pilots:
Quote:
- This was great! We had hoped to see out to 50 nautical mil, but this was surpassed by a very wide margin, "said a satisfied Evensen.
http://translate.google.com/translate?p ... ry_state0=
B. Bolsøy
Oslo |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
pfo
|
Posted: Oct 22, 2009 - 04:29 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Oct 21, 2009 - 01:12 AM
Posts: 5
|
Update question:
What is DAS range? Beyond visual range?
No info about "DAS range" in google. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SpudmanWP
|
Posted: Oct 22, 2009 - 05:51 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 3321
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
| EODAS is strictly WVR and no optical zoom. |
_________________ "The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
wrightwing
|
Posted: Oct 22, 2009 - 05:58 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Oct 23, 2008 - 04:22 PM
Posts: 1741
Status: Offline
|
|
SpudmanWP wrote:
EODAS is strictly WVR and no optical zoom.
That wasn't necessarily the impression I'd gotten from some of the presentations, etc.. I've seen. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
PhillyGuy
|
Posted: Oct 22, 2009 - 06:04 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Sep 29, 2006 - 04:07 AM
Posts: 481
Status: Offline
|
|
SpudmanWP wrote:
EODAS is strictly WVR and no optical zoom.
Well that's just perfect.  |
_________________ "Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SpudmanWP
|
Posted: Oct 22, 2009 - 06:22 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 3321
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
No presentation I have seen has ever made the claim of more than WVR, which could be 10 or more miles.
It also depends on what you are using EODAS for. If it's MLD functions, the range is significantly more.
PhilyGuy, What is bad about that? |
_________________ "The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
PhillyGuy
|
Posted: Oct 22, 2009 - 06:28 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Sep 29, 2006 - 04:07 AM
Posts: 481
Status: Offline
|
|
SpudmanWP wrote:
PhilyGuy, What is bad about that?
It seems rather limited in today's battlefield. Are there not equivalent systems already in use which can go beyond WVR and zoom? |
_________________ "Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SpudmanWP
|
Posted: Oct 22, 2009 - 07:07 PM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 3321
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
You are mixing up EODAS (the SIX IIR cameras that surround the F-35) and EOTS (the FLIR & IRST sensor under the nose).
The EOTS (BVR) has a large lens and optical zoom capability while EODAS (WVR) has a fixed (x6) field of view to continually monitor the battlespace around the aircraft.
While others have the IRST and FLIR (in separate packages) of the EOTS sensor, absolutely NOBODY has the functions of the EODAS. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
wrightwing
|
Posted: Oct 22, 2009 - 08:02 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Oct 23, 2008 - 04:22 PM
Posts: 1741
Status: Offline
|
|
SpudmanWP wrote:
You are mixing up EODAS (the SIX IIR cameras that surround the F-35) and EOTS (the FLIR & IRST sensor under the nose).
The EOTS (BVR) has a large lens and optical zoom capability while EODAS (WVR) has a fixed (x6) field of view to continually monitor the battlespace around the aircraft.
While others have the IRST and FLIR (in separate packages) of the EOTS sensor, absolutely NOBODY has the functions of the EODAS.
Oh, I know the difference between the EOTS and the EODAS. My point is that I've seen presentations where the range of the EODAS wasn't limited to WVR- it's just that the EOTS has a significantly longer range. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|