| Author |
Message |
|
renatohm
|
Posted: Sep 03, 2009 - 01:48 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Dec 27, 2004 - 08:49 PM
Posts: 128
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Feb 12, 2012 - 2:40 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
VarkVet
|
Posted: Sep 03, 2009 - 03:47 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Oct 30, 2006 - 04:31 AM
Posts: 1397
Status: Offline
|
|
renatohm wrote:
What happened tho those nice birds?
And your point?
The last time I looked the F-16 only has one motor!
The crew identified an engine anomaly and decided to shut her off relying on the numerous redundant systems to allow for a successful dead stick landing.
Since the yellow handles weren’t pulled resulting in a smoking hole … All is Well?
That's how I read the story!  |
_________________ My eyes have seen the glory of the Lord and the esthetics of the Flightline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
That_Engine_Guy
|
Posted: Sep 03, 2009 - 04:47 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Dec 14, 2005 - 05:03 AM
Posts: 2089
Location: Under the engine somewhere.
Status: Offline
|
I agree, all is well. I'm sure the problem will be identified. (At least to those who need to know )
Any landing you can walk away from... Good job guys!
TEG |
_________________ [Airplanes are] near perfect, all they lack is the ability to forgive.
— Richard Collins
|
|
|
|
 |
|
vadrp
|
Posted: Sep 03, 2009 - 06:31 AM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Mar 23, 2009 - 10:22 PM
Posts: 16
|
So ... what is the daffynition/origin of the term "dead stick" ????? |
_________________ vadrap - fighter jet fixer
|
|
|
|
 |
|
VarkVet
|
Posted: Sep 03, 2009 - 07:02 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Oct 30, 2006 - 04:31 AM
Posts: 1397
Status: Offline
|
|
vadrp wrote:
So ...  what is the daffynition/origin of the term "dead stick" ?????
PM sextusempiricus, ( or ask Jeeves)
Because he is a “consultant” and has all the answers … plus gives you a third grade spelling lesson along the way? |
_________________ My eyes have seen the glory of the Lord and the esthetics of the Flightline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Happy_Gilmore
|
Posted: Sep 03, 2009 - 08:46 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: May 15, 2004 - 01:57 AM
Posts: 295
Status: Offline
|
| I liked the part about 'Training Missions' being cancelled. Really? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
tmofarrvl
|
Posted: Sep 03, 2009 - 12:47 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Oct 20, 2006 - 12:35 AM
Posts: 215
Status: Offline
|
Dead-stick landing and airplanes grounded on Wednesday.
Inspections performed and grounding order lifted beginning Thursday.
Sounds like they have a pretty clear bead on what they are looking for. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
LinkF16SimDude
|
Posted: Sep 03, 2009 - 07:08 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Jan 31, 2004 - 07:18 PM
Posts: 2208
Status: Offline
|
From the JP article:
Quote:
...an F-16I, on a routine flight, experienced an unusual engine malfunction..
As opposed to what? A "usual" engine malfunction? Gotta wonder about journalists sometimes. |
_________________ Why does "monosyllabic" have 5 syllables?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
03fomoco
|
Posted: Sep 03, 2009 - 11:44 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Nov 07, 2007 - 03:12 AM
Posts: 73
Status: Offline
|
Term dead-stick, I have heard two origins through the years. The first was the term stick referring to wood props and when they were no longer turning. The term meant a dead stick of wood doing nothing.
The second version I heard was in the early days of powered flight controls the hydraulic pumps would be engine driven with little redundancy so when you lost the engine or engines you lost flight controls, hence the term dead-stick. I think this is a far reach since even with no assistance you still had a mechanical link to flight controls until fly by wire came along.
I would guess the first version might be the origin?
Don't worry someone smart will come along shortly... |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
vadrp
|
Posted: Sep 04, 2009 - 02:19 AM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Mar 23, 2009 - 10:22 PM
Posts: 16
|
03fomoco ... every paragraph you wrote is exactly correct ... many thanks ... I owe you one ...  |
_________________ vadrap - fighter jet fixer
|
|
|
|
 |
|
cywolf32
|
Posted: Sep 04, 2009 - 08:57 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Nov 21, 2005 - 12:04 PM
Posts: 515
Location: USA
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
guy@rdaf.dk
|
Posted: Sep 04, 2009 - 09:11 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Apr 09, 2005 - 05:08 AM
Posts: 71
Status: Offline
|
Throttle stock in A/B, so they had to chocke it with the Fuel Master Switch. Crew flew for about 20 min. to burn fuel and position the jet in a good position so they could make a sucsesful flame out pattern.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340 ... 05,00.html |
_________________ Greetings to you all at the NSA and everybody else who is reading this on ECHELON.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
03fomoco
|
Posted: Sep 04, 2009 - 01:49 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Nov 07, 2007 - 03:12 AM
Posts: 73
Status: Offline
|
| Why would you not go to SEC? That's a lot of S turns to setup for? I guess it all worked out and armchair what if's don't matter anyways, disregard. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
VarkVet
|
Posted: Sep 04, 2009 - 03:53 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Oct 30, 2006 - 04:31 AM
Posts: 1397
Status: Offline
|
Selecting SEC was probably the first thing the pilot did terminating AB … so now the motor is in MIL (still too much power for landing)
The motor will auto transfer to SEC any time she is shut off in flight because the computer thinks something is wrong and takes action.
Practicing SFO’s (Simulated Flame-out) approaches is priceless in my opinion!
Remember this incident?
http://usaf.aib.law.af.mil/F-16D_18Mar05.pdf |
_________________ My eyes have seen the glory of the Lord and the esthetics of the Flightline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
guy@rdaf.dk
|
Posted: Sep 04, 2009 - 08:45 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Apr 09, 2005 - 05:08 AM
Posts: 71
Status: Offline
|
|
Quote:
Practicing SFO’s (Simulated Flame-out) approaches is priceless in my opinion!
Depends on how you practice it! Worldwide more Vipers have been lost or heavyly damaged during a SFO practice then saved during a real flameout. One of the major causes is the pilot failing to arrest the sink rate on the roundout and touching down to hard.
Just ask the Dutch......
http://www.f-16.net/aircraft-database/F ... file/1967/
I know for a fact that this is the reason some airforces (the RDAF included) do not allow pilots to practice SFO's to a full landing, but only down to a low (100 ft.) approach.
But then again, if we did'nt practice it at all we would not have a chance in a real emergency. |
_________________ Greetings to you all at the NSA and everybody else who is reading this on ECHELON.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|