| Author |
Message |
|
pomeroy
|
Posted: Aug 13, 2009 - 03:45 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Mar 05, 2009 - 03:30 PM
Posts: 68
Location: Florida
Status: Offline
|
| Ok got a kinda dumb question on Aircraft U.S. Halon is the main source of killing a fire in the internal fuel cells. But if I remember right F-16 in U.S air space are not allowed to run it unless they Deployed or leaving for one right they run Nitrogen instead Im not sure been a long time since it ever came up so just looking for some info on it and a referance to like the EPA or something along those lines and thanks for the Help |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Feb 12, 2012 - 10:44 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Lurch
|
Posted: Aug 13, 2009 - 07:51 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Aug 16, 2004 - 09:42 PM
Posts: 275
Status: Offline
|
| Never heard putting nitrogen in the halon bottle, but I haven't crewed a f-16 in a long time. Times may have changed. |
_________________ Crew Chief
Torrejon 614th Lucky Devils 87-0248
Homestead/Moody 307th Stingers 89-2054 (Comander's CC)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sciafer
|
Posted: Aug 13, 2009 - 08:22 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Feb 02, 2004 - 12:18 AM
Posts: 119
Status: Offline
|
| Yea when not serivced with Halon we serviced it up with Nitrogen |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Lurch
|
Posted: Aug 13, 2009 - 08:46 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Aug 16, 2004 - 09:42 PM
Posts: 275
Status: Offline
|
| Sciafer - When did this change????? just curious. |
_________________ Crew Chief
Torrejon 614th Lucky Devils 87-0248
Homestead/Moody 307th Stingers 89-2054 (Comander's CC)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
pomeroy
|
Posted: Aug 13, 2009 - 09:12 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Mar 05, 2009 - 03:30 PM
Posts: 68
Location: Florida
Status: Offline
|
| I know at luke we use Nitrogen at least since 01 but if some one could find the reason we dont fly with Halon in the tank I know there is one just can't remember I think its a EPA issue but not sure and it should be in the Servicing T.O. |
_________________ Crew Chief
85-443 ADCC
83-178 DCC
86-296 DCC
My bad is the last thing you want to hear on a Friday night.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Elliboom
|
Posted: Aug 13, 2009 - 09:37 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Apr 05, 2006 - 07:21 PM
Posts: 421
Location: Lincoln, NE
Status: Offline
|
| We still fly with Halon on all of our tanks, both the portable ones and the ones on the engines. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
mark
|
Posted: Aug 13, 2009 - 09:47 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Dec 09, 2003 - 07:55 PM
Posts: 397
Status: Offline
|
|
Elliboom wrote:
We still fly with Halon on all of our tanks, both the portable ones and the ones on the engines.
"engines" is the clue here. In multi engine aircraft Halon is used as a fire extinguishing agent. In the F-16 its used as a fuel inerting agent. It inerts the fuel vapors, typically only used in a combat environment. Stateside there is no need for a fuel inerting system. It is a known ozone depleting substance. |
_________________ Gravity....its not just a good idea, ITS THE LAW!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
dukey172
|
Posted: Aug 14, 2009 - 03:19 AM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Jan 30, 2008 - 09:52 AM
Posts: 15
Status: Offline
|
| I left 16's in 07 to work on RPA's. We never had the halon bottle on the plane filled with halon or nit. They where filled if we where deployed. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
mark
|
Posted: Aug 14, 2009 - 03:23 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Dec 09, 2003 - 07:55 PM
Posts: 397
Status: Offline
|
| They put gaseous nitrogen in the bottle to cut down on corrosion. |
_________________ Gravity....its not just a good idea, ITS THE LAW!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
rupp05
|
Posted: Aug 14, 2009 - 04:54 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Sep 26, 2006 - 10:26 PM
Posts: 55
|
|
pomeroy wrote:
Ok got a kinda dumb question on Aircraft U.S. Halon is the main source of killing a fire in the internal fuel cells. But if I remember right F-16 in U.S air space are not allowed to run it unless they Deployed or leaving for one right they run Nitrogen instead Im not sure been a long time since it ever came up so just looking for some info on it and a referance to like the EPA or something along those lines and thanks for the Help
Depends on the base, some use nit, others leave empty. All filled with halon when downrange |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sciafer
|
Posted: Aug 14, 2009 - 01:42 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Feb 02, 2004 - 12:18 AM
Posts: 119
Status: Offline
|
|
rupp05 wrote:
pomeroy wrote:
Ok got a kinda dumb question on Aircraft U.S. Halon is the main source of killing a fire in the internal fuel cells. But if I remember right F-16 in U.S air space are not allowed to run it unless they Deployed or leaving for one right they run Nitrogen instead Im not sure been a long time since it ever came up so just looking for some info on it and a referance to like the EPA or something along those lines and thanks for the Help
Depends on the base, some use nit, others leave empty. All filled with halon when downrange
Thanks Rupp dog....ya hit it on the head! |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
JoeSambor
|
Posted: Aug 14, 2009 - 07:37 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Dec 28, 2004 - 05:56 AM
Posts: 686
Status: Offline
|
Nitrogen (clean, dry nitrogen) is used in the Halon bottle to keep it from corroding internally.
Best Regards, |
_________________ Joe Sambor
LM Aero Field Service Engineer
Woensdrecht Logistics Center, The Netherlands
|
|
|
|
 |
|
ViperKeeper
|
Posted: Aug 14, 2009 - 08:51 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Oct 06, 2005 - 08:32 AM
Posts: 430
Status: Offline
|
| It is in the -6 for AM's .. 30day Halon servicing (NiT gets topped off). |
_________________ GERB
98-01 22nd
01-03 416th/Pro
03-04 36th
04 79th
05-08 312th
08-08 331skv
08-09 313th
|
|
|
|
 |
|
VarkVet
|
Posted: Aug 15, 2009 - 06:57 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Oct 30, 2006 - 04:31 AM
Posts: 1397
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
crackhead
|
Posted: Oct 08, 2009 - 05:44 AM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Feb 05, 2007 - 07:03 PM
Posts: 12
Status: Offline
|
| Lurch, it was about 1995 when the halon was replaced with nitro. on us soil. hope this helps some. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|