Forum: Off-topic

F-4 Phantom II: Hurricane Buster?



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   1, 2  Next
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
Kryptid
PostPosted: Apr 05, 2009 - 10:41 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Aug 10, 2008 - 02:16 AM
Posts: 343

Status: Offline
It can destroy MiGs, but hurricanes? Popular Science has something to say about this:

http://www.popsci.com/military-aviation-amp-space/article/2009-03/hurricane-busters

Sounds like shooting a pellet rifle at a freight train to me, but maybe it's worth a try.

_________________
Jesus is coming soon. Be prepared for Him.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 26, 2012 - 3:46 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
skyhigh
PostPosted: Apr 06, 2009 - 01:09 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Feb 27, 2009 - 11:01 AM
Posts: 467

Status: Offline
This hurricane buster task should be left to the Raptor, owing to its supercruise capability.

The next time another hurricane tears trough the southeast, a flight of four F-22 Raptors with wing tanks (what's the stealth for if you're flying against a weapon of nature?) will generate sonic booms and maintain supercruise speeds of five minutes total (the Raptor's maximum supercruise duration time) until the next pair relieves them. The process is repeated until the hurricane dies out due to the sonic booms.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
ptplauthor
PostPosted: Apr 06, 2009 - 01:44 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Nov 02, 2008 - 12:09 AM
Posts: 730
Location: Titletown, USA
Status: Offline
Let's see, the QF-4s are only drones, so that's out, and the DoD isn't going to waste money using Raptors to fly through hurricanes, look at how expensive one of them is, and do you honestly think you'd be able to find a pilot brave (or crazy) enough to risk his life flying through a hurricane at supersonic speeds?

No matter how much NOAA or whoever (in the US government) wishes for this to happen, chances are slim to bupkis that this will EVER happen, and it'll NEVER happen with Raptors. I could see stripped down Eagles doing something like this, but something tells me that won't happen either.

It might get looked at, but costs in terms of pilots and materiel to support the effort will probably nix it.

_________________
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
skyhigh
PostPosted: Apr 06, 2009 - 02:10 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Feb 27, 2009 - 11:01 AM
Posts: 467

Status: Offline
I mean only four Raptors would be useful against a hurricane, and they would operate in pairs, flying around them and generating sonic booms.

Why would you want to fly through the eye of the storm?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
ptplauthor
PostPosted: Apr 06, 2009 - 02:23 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Nov 02, 2008 - 12:09 AM
Posts: 730
Location: Titletown, USA
Status: Offline
Quote:

four Raptors


And I'm saying the United States Air Force is not going to risk their top-of-the-line stealth fighter that costs a pretty d@mn penny to go try and screw around with stuff like that. If Mach 1 is needed, the friggin Eagle can do it. The Hurricane doesn't have friggin SAMs or an air force of its own

Yeah, sure the Raptor can supercruise, good, but there's no freaking need to deploy nearly a half-billion dollars worth of airplane, and four highly valuable aircrew to stop a force of nature.

You said it yourself in your last post, what's stealth good for when it comes to nature? Nothing, that's why if--and that's a d@mn big IF--the US ever does do something like this, it's not going to be with Raptors.

Just because the USAF has a new freaking technology, doesn't mean it has to be used for every hair-brained idea that some schmuck comes up with.

_________________
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
That_Engine_Guy
PostPosted: Apr 06, 2009 - 02:51 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Dec 14, 2005 - 05:03 AM
Posts: 2168
Location: Under the engine somewhere.
Status: Offline
If ANY supersonic jet aircraft enters a hurricane and encounters large hail, it is finished. (Period, end of discussion...)
Jet engines don't like ice being hurled down the inlets at MACH1+ speeds... Doh

It has been a problem with the composite props on the WC-130Js
Quote:
From official AF news releases, we know that the two biggest problems were, 1) damage occuring to the leading edge of the new high tech composite propellers, caused by heavy rain, and occasional hail, found in tropical storms, and 2) a lack of sensitivity with the new color radar. The propeller problem was solved by adding a metal "taco" to the leading edge of each blade. Changes in the radar software fixed that problem, allowing the aircraft to be declared fully operational.


While the F119 is much less suceptiable to FOD, NOBODY would fly a $137M Raptor into a hurricane. You may get NASA/NOAA/DoD to try a modified QF-4, but if you run into large hail, the mighty J79s will meet their match... Two Cents

A "hail-resistant" aircraft has been built; a T-28 that was "armored" to protect it from hail-stones. I don't know how successful you'd be trying to armor plate a Phantom. Shrug
Cool reading here about the T-28: http://www.ias.sdsmt.edu/institute/t28/plane.htm

Keep 'em flyin' Thumb
TEG

Keep 'em flyin'
TEG

_________________
[Airplanes are] near perfect, all they lack is the ability to forgive.
— Richard Collins
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
TC
PostPosted: Apr 06, 2009 - 03:43 AM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Moderator
F-16.net Moderator


Joined: Jan 14, 2004 - 07:06 AM
Posts: 3999

Status: Offline
That_Engine_Guy wrote:
I don't know how successful you'd be trying to armor plate a Phantom.


Funny you mention this. About 6 E model Rhinos from Pops' squadron at Bitburg (including his jet) were temporarily farmed out to the IDF/AF, to fly in the 1973 Yom Kippur War. They returned with armor plating attached to critical areas of the jet.

Concerning the jets used for hurricanes, this idea is completely asinine. There's really nothing that we can do to prevent a hurricane from striking us. All you can do is safely store what you don't want damaged, and then find safe cover for yourself.

_________________
"He counted on America to be passive...He counted wrong." -- President Ronald Reagan
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
That_Engine_Guy
PostPosted: Apr 06, 2009 - 04:05 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Dec 14, 2005 - 05:03 AM
Posts: 2168
Location: Under the engine somewhere.
Status: Offline
Well there is always the nuke idea...... Shrug

I doubt that would work either

TEG

_________________
[Airplanes are] near perfect, all they lack is the ability to forgive.
— Richard Collins
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
ptplauthor
PostPosted: Apr 06, 2009 - 04:09 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Nov 02, 2008 - 12:09 AM
Posts: 730
Location: Titletown, USA
Status: Offline
Quote:

nuke idea


Then you run into the problem of radioactive rain....and that's not good for the precious bodily fluids!

_________________
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
johnwill
PostPosted: Apr 06, 2009 - 04:41 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Mar 24, 2007 - 09:06 PM
Posts: 1154
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Status: Offline
When I was about 10 (1950), there was a comic book series called Blackhawk. They were an international squadron of jet fighters who went around doing all kinds of good deeds. Their airplanes were modeled after the Lockheed F-90, which never made it into production.

One of their adventures was to fly their four jets through a tornado funnel, thus breaking it up and saving the town directly in its path. Sounded like a good idea to me at the time.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
PhillyGuy
PostPosted: Apr 06, 2009 - 04:41 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Sep 29, 2006 - 04:07 AM
Posts: 481

Status: Offline
There already is a solution to Hurricanes. It's a biodegradable powered that absorbs water (vapor) like there is no tomorrow. It then turns into a jell several times the powder's own mass amd eventually dissolves once falling into the ocean. Dump tons (from C-5's/C-17's) of it over a hurricane or in its path and results would have to be produced.

Link

Notice the date of the article. As usual, the US government has its head up the rear side, much like it did during Katrina.

_________________
"Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest."
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Guysmiley
PostPosted: Apr 06, 2009 - 03:59 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: May 26, 2005 - 08:39 PM
Posts: 1496

That_Engine_Guy wrote:
Well there is always the nuke idea...... Shrug

I doubt that would work either

TEG


The power in a hurricane is mind boggling. A 100MT nuke would be like farting at a strong breeze.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
asiatrails
PostPosted: Apr 07, 2009 - 04:33 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 30, 2005 - 03:11 AM
Posts: 865

Status: Offline
Guysmiley wrote:
That_Engine_Guy wrote:
Well there is always the nuke idea...... Shrug

I doubt that would work either

TEG


The power in a hurricane is mind boggling. A 100MT nuke would be like farting at a strong breeze.


Ok we have hurricane's, nukes and we need one more thing, pull NASA 816 out of the barn and tell Gums to saddle up. Who wants the back seat?

http://oea.larc.nasa.gov/PAIS/Concept2R ... tning.html
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
That_Engine_Guy
PostPosted: Apr 07, 2009 - 04:36 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Dec 14, 2005 - 05:03 AM
Posts: 2168
Location: Under the engine somewhere.
Status: Offline
"SHOTGUN!" Very Happy

Now that J75 should be able to cope with some hail...

Cheers TEG

_________________
[Airplanes are] near perfect, all they lack is the ability to forgive.
— Richard Collins
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
ptplauthor
PostPosted: Apr 07, 2009 - 04:45 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Nov 02, 2008 - 12:09 AM
Posts: 730
Location: Titletown, USA
Status: Offline
Are you sure you want to fly in that -106. looks pretty beat up to me, maybe I should go, you're too valuable to lose, TEG. Who else would educate the board on engines?

I'm not saying Gums is a bad pilot--I'm sure he's an excellent pilot, just the plane looks like it's about had it.

This happens every time, my wi-fi crashes and I miss out on something great....

_________________
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2012 F-16.net