Forum: F-16 News

RoKAF KF-16D crashes into the Yellow Sea



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
SGTICEMAN
PostPosted: Apr 05, 2009 - 02:34 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Jan 19, 2008 - 02:52 PM
Posts: 1

Status: Offline
ROKAF will resume KF-16 flights as of 6 April 2009.

KF16D #92-4048 (123FS, 20FW) was crashed in Yellow Sea at 31 March 2009.

This mishap a not cause of airframe trouble.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 21, 2013 - 8:27 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
darkvarkguy
PostPosted: Apr 05, 2009 - 06:11 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Mar 05, 2009 - 06:01 AM
Posts: 366
Location: Raleigh, NC
Status: Offline
Tough couple of weeks for ROKAF. I'm glad both guys got out safely.

_________________
FB-111A Pease AFB 82-87
A-10A Suwon AB ROK 87-88
FB-111A/F-111G Pease AFB 88-90
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Gamera
PostPosted: May 26, 2009 - 05:09 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: May 23, 2005 - 08:54 AM
Posts: 663

Status: Offline
] 31 March 2009:
] KF-16D Block 52N. 92-4048.

http://headlines.yahoo.co.jp/hl?a=20090 ... 55-yonh-kr

On 22 May 2009, the ROKAF proclaimed the accident cause was human mistake. The accident occurred during a normal training flight to practise climbing at slow speed to lose lift, then recovering the plane just before it stalled.

During the accident, while climbing at slow speed, the trainee pilot in the front seat was late to initiate recovery. The instructor pilot in the back seat recognised their problem, took control, and tried to recover; but speed rapidly dropped, and stalled.
The plane was inverted and uncontrollable at 5,700 m ASL; and the pilots punched out at 1,740 m ASL.

Debris/wreck were salvaged for investigation. Front fuselage and rear wings were damaged, but both wings and fuselage seemed in excellent condition.
Mechanical cause/problem was improbable.

(Yahoo! South Korea News probably has articles, with more details, from the original source Yon Hap News.)

http://kr.news.yahoo.com/service/news/s ... wssetid=82
http://kr.news.yahoo.com/service/news/s ... wssetid=82

Illustrations of the accident/stall.

(Seeing is believing.)
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Gamera
PostPosted: Aug 24, 2009 - 04:48 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: May 23, 2005 - 08:54 AM
Posts: 663

Status: Offline
http://rokdrop.com/2009/03/31/korean-f- ... ellow-sea/

"Korean F-16 Crashes in the Yellow Sea"

By GI Korea on March 31st, 2009 at 3:25 pm

(Scroll down a bit, and read the funky comments by NB and ChickenHead.)
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Gamera
PostPosted: Dec 19, 2009 - 02:02 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: May 23, 2005 - 08:54 AM
Posts: 663

Status: Offline
(Correct me if I'm wrong!)

http://kr.news.yahoo.com/service/news/s ... setid=1352
http://kr.news.yahoo.com/service/news/s ... setid=1352
http://kr.news.yahoo.com/service/news/s ... setid=1352

11 December 2009:
Seems this year's ROKAF Top Gun is a Major (40) of 122nd FS, 11th FW, who flies the F-15K, and flew the F-4, F-5, and F-16.
Seems in June 2001, he bailed out of a F-16.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
geogen
PostPosted: Dec 20, 2009 - 03:12 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Mar 11, 2008 - 03:28 PM
Posts: 2804
Location: 45 km offshore, New England
Status: Offline
Thanks again for your invaluable info to F16.net, Gamera. Interesting reading always.

edit: I apologize for the Off-Topic. Thanks for link.

_________________
The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.


Last edited by geogen on Dec 20, 2009 - 05:12 AM; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Gamera
PostPosted: Dec 20, 2009 - 04:22 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: May 23, 2005 - 08:54 AM
Posts: 663

Status: Offline
(Off-topic alert.)

Try my "Japan's annual defence white paper 2005 [sic]" thread at
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showth ... ost1460771
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
popcorn
PostPosted: Dec 20, 2009 - 03:58 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Sep 24, 2008 - 09:55 AM
Posts: 2033

Status: Offline
Gamera wrote:
] 31 March 2009:]
The plane was inverted and uncontrollable at 5,700 m ASL; and the pilots punched out at 1,740 m ASL.


I'm a layman and obviously can't appreciate the pickle the pilots found themselves in but they were more than 3 miles above sea level which strikes me as pretty high up and just maybe enough height to effect a recovery. Or is this situation something that test pilots never tried emulating during the development and testing of the Viper? Could the FCS be programmed to automatically recover from such a scenario? Just curious.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
LinkF16SimDude
PostPosted: Dec 21, 2009 - 05:31 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Jan 31, 2004 - 07:18 PM
Posts: 2365

Status: Offline
Not a whole lotta specifics there but it sounds like they tried to do a simple approach to a stall and got themselves into an upright deep stall. But in the process of rocking outta that, they may not have arrested the nose falling thru the vertical fast enough and it snapped into an inverted deep stall, which is even scarier than the upright 'cause of the negative G and that wicked spin. Generally the safety rules state that if you haven't recovered and regained control by a set altitude that you must eject. For USAF it used to be 10,000 ft. ASL and may still be. Those guys punched at just under 6000 ASL, so they cut it real close.

popcorn wrote:
...is this situation something that test pilots never tried emulating during the development and testing of the Viper?

Deep stalls have been known about for years and not just in the Viper world. Edwards had (and maybe still does) a program where line pilots went up in a spin chute-equipped jet and flew or were flown into a deep stall so they knew what to do. Not sure if the Eddie techs had to tweak the jet to facilitate the stall entry tho.

We trained both kinds of deep stall recoveries in the sims at Tucson by moving the fuel balance and CG around. We also had a preset that put you in it immediately and could make it recoverable or non-recoverable. Had to show 'em that even though they did all they could to rescue the jet, you have to know when it's time to part ways with it.

Check out what Obi Gums had to say about deep stalls in the Viper back in '04 here (second entry down).

_________________
Why does "monosyllabic" have 5 syllables?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
popcorn
PostPosted: Dec 21, 2009 - 06:36 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Sep 24, 2008 - 09:55 AM
Posts: 2033

Status: Offline
Thanks Link.. tried to absorb what you and Gums wrote. Lucky crew.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Gamera
PostPosted: Jun 13, 2010 - 08:41 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: May 23, 2005 - 08:54 AM
Posts: 663

Status: Offline
http://kr.news.yahoo.com/service/news/s ... setid=1352

http://kr.news.yahoo.com/service/news/s ... setid=1352

"The successful completion of USAF F-16 CCIP Program

9 Jun 2010

Korean Air

USAF"

In this case, what's this "CCIP"?

(The only CCIP that I knew is the "death dot" reticle in the HUD in air-to-ground mode...)
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Boman
PostPosted: Jun 13, 2010 - 11:38 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 08, 2004 - 08:22 PM
Posts: 1106

Status: Offline
CCIP is an improvement program, under which both Block 40's and Block 50's are brought up to the same technical standard. Search the site, and you will find quite a few articles and discussion on it.
PACAF Vipers were upgraded in Korea, hence the milestone marker

_________________
Best regards
Niels

http://s587.photobucket.com/albums/ss316/NC-Boman/
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
AfterburnerDecalsScott
PostPosted: Jun 14, 2010 - 01:27 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: May 10, 2005 - 07:45 PM
Posts: 1246

Status: Offline
Gamera wrote:
http://kr.news.yahoo.com/service/news/shellview.htm?articleid=20100610152308671a3&linkid=4&newssetid=1352

http://kr.news.yahoo.com/service/news/s ... setid=1352

"The successful completion of USAF F-16 CCIP Program

9 Jun 2010

Korean Air

USAF"

In this case, what's this "CCIP"?

(The only CCIP that I knew is the "death dot" reticle in the HUD in air-to-ground mode...)


Man that's a weird looking picture...I'd swear that was a photoshop job with a model, except it has the JHMCS sensor that distinguishes a Block 40 CCIP jet.

I Still think it looks like a model though....

_________________
More people have died driving with Ted Kennedy than hunting with Dick Cheney.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Butcher
PostPosted: Jun 14, 2010 - 04:48 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Jun 21, 2008 - 06:37 AM
Posts: 104
Location: Larnaca, Cyprus
Status: Offline
Check the root of the vertical tail, it has no antennae. Also the vertical tail is also missing that small thing at the middle top. Also no serial number. It could be photochopped.

 View user's profile Send private message  
 
madrat
PostPosted: Jun 14, 2010 - 06:11 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Mar 03, 2010 - 03:12 AM
Posts: 986

Status: Offline
You can normally spot a PS job by the file properties. The shadow on the airplane from it's canopy is a different angle than the shadows of the people. The airplane is in sharp focus; uncanny the lens would have such super capabilities.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic