Forum: Modern Military Aircraft

Cats and dogs living together... mass Pandemonium



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   1, 2  Next
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
elp
PostPosted: Jun 24, 2004 - 09:59 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Sep 23, 2003 - 09:08 PM
Posts: 3133

Yeah thats right. I'm taking about that topic that drives hobbiests wild, the fallout from the Cope India '2004 exercise like the following [url=http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=pandemonium&spell=1"]story[/url]. .... F-15 involved in red and blue exercises with the old IAF.

Really I have given up trying to explain it. I've heard it all; USAF pilots can't cut it, The SU-30 rules ( even though in the ROE they were using the crappy AA10 ( R-27) ( don't get me started on this weapon ) Not the AA-12 ( R-77) for BVR scoring purposes in how the rules were set up.

All in all it was a pretty positive learning experience for both sides, yet if you read all of the public consumption stories on this its just makes you shake your head. Trying to explain the how and why of the reasons we set up exercises like this in the first place can be nothing but a wasted effort sometimes, once the "results" ( what ever that is in the public consumption press ) are "announced".

The Indians have good pilots and train and mission plan hard just like we do. The SU-30, fat pig that it is, can get off some shots. Would I want one of these jets in my air force? Probably not, ( for any number of reasons ). But thats doesn't matter. The USAF pukes will have to endure all of the arm chair flyers for who knows how long on this one.

( ground rules: If you know something that is not public consumption, don't post it here. I just started this post for a fun public consumption only rant. )

_________________
- ELP -
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 26, 2012 - 3:24 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
SwedgeII
PostPosted: Jun 25, 2004 - 02:34 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Feb 06, 2004 - 01:37 PM
Posts: 338

Status: Offline
"The US fighters flew with certain restrictions that handicapped their effectiveness."
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
SwedgeII
PostPosted: Jun 25, 2004 - 02:44 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Feb 06, 2004 - 01:37 PM
Posts: 338

Status: Offline
Some believe it is essentially a sales pitch to the US government for the F/A-22.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
SwedgeII
PostPosted: Jun 25, 2004 - 02:47 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Feb 06, 2004 - 01:37 PM
Posts: 338

Status: Offline
In these offensive and defensive missions, four F-15Cs were usually flying against 10 or 12 of the same model Indian fighter, according to Col. Greg Neubeck, deputy commander of operations for the wing's 3rd Operations Group and exercise director for Cope India. The 3rd Operations Group is responsible for the 3rd Wing's flying mission.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
SwedgeII
PostPosted: Jun 25, 2004 - 02:51 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Feb 06, 2004 - 01:37 PM
Posts: 338

Status: Offline
I wonder what the restrictions were placed on the F-15's probably something stupid like Visually ID before they could shoot!! I also wonder if any of the 15's were the ones with the Phased radar!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
SwedgeII
PostPosted: Jun 25, 2004 - 04:44 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Feb 06, 2004 - 01:37 PM
Posts: 338

Status: Offline
Ah Ha!!!!! "One of the reasons the IAF is taking the praise lightly is that the exercise did not involve use of sophisticated technology.
The officer said the exercise did not cover such aspects of modern air warfare as Beyond Visual Range flying and firing. "
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
SwedgeII
PostPosted: Jun 25, 2004 - 04:46 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Feb 06, 2004 - 01:37 PM
Posts: 338

Status: Offline
pretty bogus as that is what the F-15 does best!!! if they want a close in fight send in the 16's!!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
DeepSpace
PostPosted: Jun 25, 2004 - 08:57 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Aug 14, 2003 - 07:26 PM
Posts: 1050

Status: Offline
haha.
Just reminding me how the USN kicked a** by the IDF/AF Wink
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
KarimAbdoun
PostPosted: Jun 26, 2004 - 04:04 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jan 30, 2004 - 07:47 PM
Posts: 509

Status: Offline
Then you all can't take this as a measure to compare between the 15 and the 30, Russia, this is for you.

_________________
The fighter is not what counts, it's the one who's flying it that matters!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
elp
PostPosted: Jun 26, 2004 - 09:42 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Sep 23, 2003 - 09:08 PM
Posts: 3133

KarimAbdoun wrote:
Then you all can't take this as a measure to compare between the 15 and the 30, Russia, this is for you.


That would be only part of the picture of course as the most modern big SU's .... in operational units in quantity... are not in Russia... add to that.... The Indian aircrew is funded to do their job... unlike the RuAF.

_________________
- ELP -
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
SwedgeII
PostPosted: Jun 28, 2004 - 03:19 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Feb 06, 2004 - 01:37 PM
Posts: 338

Status: Offline
If the USAF could have used Slammers first it would have easily mopped up the dregs. I still think the USAF is being really vocal about losing just so they get the bucks for the F-35 and F-22. Works for me!!!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
elp
PostPosted: Jul 27, 2004 - 08:58 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Sep 23, 2003 - 09:08 PM
Posts: 3133

Probably not far off the mark there.

The SU-30's USAF encountered in the exercise was just the small batch of the early jets that India got: SU-30K. The K is basically just a two seat SU-27 with air to air refueling added and not much more. The K is an a2a only jet. Can't do R77 ( AA12 ). Just SARH R-27 ( AA10 ) and the very capable HOBS R-73 (AA11). So having said that, an F-15 with AMRAAM real world would hardly be a weakling. SU-30K is a threat jet. Just keep it real.

The K model for India is just for starters in their SU-30 program. Once they get the SU-30MKI sorted out, then you really will have a threat jet. R77 (AA12) ability and A2G ability as well. French and Israeli avionics, GPS/INS. SU-30MKI will also have thrust vectored engines but that doesn't do much for me if everyone has HOBS heaters someday.( TV nozzles is yet just something more that has to be inspected and maintained ). Pretty interesting jet. Still want to see some real world maintenance / sustainment procedure on it Wink.

Basic SU-30K shown here at Cope India ( USAF photo )



su30k.jpg
 Description:
Indian SU-30K ( a basic no frills SU-30 ) A2A only.
 Filesize:  28.83 KB
 Viewed:  3965 Time(s)

su30k.jpg



_________________
- ELP -
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
elp
PostPosted: Jul 31, 2004 - 10:07 AM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Sep 23, 2003 - 09:08 PM
Posts: 3133

.......In the offensive counterair scenarios, a small number of F-15Cs would attempt to intercept an enemy strike aircraft en route to a target that was guarded by a larger number of Indian fighters.

In the defensive counterair missions, the F-15s would attempt to defend a target against Indian fighters.In these offensive and defensive missions, four F-15Cs were usually flying against 10 or 12 of the same model Indian fighter, according to Col. Greg Neubeck, deputy commander of operations for the wing's 3rd Operations Group and exercise director for Cope India. ....

_________________
- ELP -
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Pumpkin
PostPosted: Jul 31, 2004 - 10:58 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Nov 07, 2003 - 09:12 PM
Posts: 901

sorry elp, I might be wrong but my understanding is, USAF is always training to face an overwhelming number of aggressors and to neutralize these offenses. The handicap was designed by both parties during the scenario build, with the main intent to test the F-15 air-superiorty role. Why the emphasis on the difference in number? Rolling Eyes

cheers,

_________________
Desmond


Last edited by Pumpkin on Dec 10, 2004 - 09:05 AM; edited 2 times in total
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
elp
PostPosted: Jul 31, 2004 - 02:30 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Sep 23, 2003 - 09:08 PM
Posts: 3133

Because it is never brought up by many people on this subject. The only babbling out there is SU-30 beats F-15 and thats it, with many people not looking at all the facts. Of course USAF running off crying to congress doesn't help either. I can sell F-22 to congress and never bring up Cope India.

Like I said, I would be real curious how the scoring was setup and done. BVR missiles are always over-rated in exercises. And when you look at it. Bison ( heavily mod'ed MiG-21 for India ) has a better BVR missile that the SU-30K everyone is hyping about. That is the funny part. Bison has R-77 ( AA-12 ) and the SU-30K ( which was in the exercise, does not )

Anyway. Lots of mis-information on Cope India.

MiG-21 Bison. ( select "MiG-21 Bison Virtual Walkaround" ) at this link:
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Images/Special/Bison/

_________________
- ELP -
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2012 F-16.net