Forum: F-16 Procedures

Radio equipment, frequencies, AWACS management



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
robin_hood
PostPosted: Feb 28, 2009 - 12:46 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Feb 28, 2009 - 12:24 PM
Posts: 5
Location: France
Status: Offline
Hi, everybody

I'm unsure if this is the best section to ask this, but I was wondering about a few things recently, concerning combat communications. Of course, if some/all af the answers are classified or "no-talk" here, make sure you don't answer them Very Happy Shall we begin ? Ok, let's go :

1°) Radio equipment & frequencies

No, I won't ask about frequencies used Smile
I was under the impression that combat pilots (and others) could listen to several (2 ?) radio frequencies at the same time, possibly tuned on each different ear. Is that correct ?
If it is, I suppose one of the radios tuned is the control frequency (ATC, AWACS, GCI). Do pilots inside a flight have a separate frequency so that they can talk to each other without bothering anyone else, or must they use a "general" frequency whenever they want to transmit each other instructions ?
I'm talking as much in normal environment as in combat environment.

2°) ABMs

Secondly. When in a combat environment/exercise, pilots do of course switch to AWACS ABM's frequencies for control and information. My question is : are there several ABMs in an AWACS plane (I would guess so) ? How are different flights assigned to an ABM (if different flights are assigned to different ABMs) : by area (how big ?), by mission ?
Because in a (large) combat zone, radio comms could probably quickly become saturated if there are several flights engaging several bandit groups. To avoid this flights would be assigned to different ABM frequencies ?
Or would only radio efficient comms be enough to keep things well ?
And, lastly, back to 1°), if flights don't have a separate channel to communicate, radio saturation risks growing rapidly, doesn't it ?

Of course, if you find this boring or anything, please fell free to skip this thread Wink Hope my questions aren't too unanswerable Rolling Eyes
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 18, 2013 - 11:45 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
ATFS_Crash
PostPosted: Feb 28, 2009 - 01:04 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Dec 15, 2006 - 12:28 AM
Posts: 760

I think they use Blackberries now;) j/k

_________________
How many F-22s and JSFs could have been bought with $700 billion? Correct that.

Make that $1.7 Trillion.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
SnakeHandler
PostPosted: Feb 28, 2009 - 05:47 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jul 01, 2007 - 07:22 PM
Posts: 620

We should. But we have a UHF primary radio that we use to communicate with our flight and anyone else outside our flight such as AWACS, JTACs, etc. We have a VHF aux that we use to communicate within the flight. All comm goes to both ears but we can distinguish between the two by running split volumes. I usually have the aux louder than the primary since I want to hear what my flight has to say over anyone else.

Also, each AWACS has many Weapons Directors in the back. Each flight is usually assigned one for their entire mission. In large force excercises several flights will be assigned one WD.

You are correct in that comm discipline and brevity become extremely important. Sometimes it is inevitable that comm gets saturated but if we use proper comm discipline then things work out fine.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
robin_hood
PostPosted: Mar 01, 2009 - 01:43 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Feb 28, 2009 - 12:24 PM
Posts: 5
Location: France
Status: Offline
Wow, thank you very much Smile Very valuable information here, much better than trying to guess ! And you followed brevity by saying so much in so few words Wink

So, last unclear [Link pending approval] In large exercises with lot of combat in the same zone, how many flights would typically be assigned to the same WD ? I suppose the WDs must communicate quite a bit with each other if that number is low (like 1 or 2). And how would the flights be grouped (like, two flights that have the same kind of mission (ex: a CAP) would be assigned the same WD, or two flights that will operate in the very same [Link pending approval]) ?

PS : is there a difference between Air Battle Manager and Weapon Director ? I have a USAF document that says "ABM/WD" throughout
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
SnakeHandler
PostPosted: Mar 01, 2009 - 05:47 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jul 01, 2007 - 07:22 PM
Posts: 620

ABM/WD is used interchangeably. As to how many flights get assigned to one and how they work together, the answer is the typical fighter pilot answer of "it depends." There is no way to clearly answer that without opening up tactics, techniques and procedures. Just know that whatever cards are dealt, the whole team works together and we get the job done.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
robin_hood
PostPosted: Mar 03, 2009 - 12:55 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Feb 28, 2009 - 12:24 PM
Posts: 5
Location: France
Status: Offline
Roger, thank you very much for the infos
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
robin_hood
PostPosted: Mar 25, 2009 - 03:52 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Feb 28, 2009 - 12:24 PM
Posts: 5
Location: France
Status: Offline
Well, hi again, I have a new question. I didn't want to open up a brand new thread, so, though it isn't on exactly the same subject.

I'm wondering about some vague definitions in the Brevity Code, like :

Quote:
TRASHED Informative call that missile has been defeated.


Does that mean ennemy missile defeated by own aircraft, or own/friendly missile defeated by ennemy aircraft ?

I used to assume the former, but more and more now I'm thinking it could well be the latter. So what does it means, really ?

Oh, another question : in a few Red Flag audio recordings, I have heard a WD declare aircraft as "dead man"... I can't find a definition, but I suppose it means an aircraft that has been virtually killed ?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
ptplauthor
PostPosted: Apr 04, 2009 - 12:51 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Nov 02, 2008 - 12:09 AM
Posts: 732
Location: Titletown, USA
Status: Offline
As far as what I remember from flight sims, when a shot was trashed, the other guy evaded--or the missile just didn't track.

As for the Red Flag, I do not believe the participating aircraft have the sensors installed (like Army MILES gear) so any kill decisions would then have to be made by the AWACS WDs.

This may be wrong, before taking my word, wait for verification from the pros.

_________________
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
grzegorz_89
PostPosted: Jul 31, 2011 - 02:19 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Jul 27, 2011 - 01:08 AM
Posts: 3
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Hi,

It's not worth to write new topic so I'll ask here.
Can you explain me what's the difference between AN/ARC-164 and AN/URC- 164 radio? As I know URC is mounted in Block 50/52 as well as ARC- 232.
I've found a nice brochure about ARC- 164 (here [Link pending approval]) and nothing about the second one.

Regards
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
ygbsm
PostPosted: Jul 31, 2011 - 02:55 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: May 31, 2010 - 08:15 AM
Posts: 55

Status: Offline
SnakeHandler wrote:
We should. But we have a UHF primary radio that we use to communicate with our flight and anyone else outside our flight such as AWACS, JTACs, etc. We have a VHF aux that we use to communicate within the flight. All comm goes to both ears but we can distinguish between the two by running split volumes. I usually have the aux louder than the primary since I want to hear what my flight has to say over anyone else.

Also, each AWACS has many Weapons Directors in the back. Each flight is usually assigned one for their entire mission. In large force excercises several flights will be assigned one WD.

You are correct in that comm discipline and brevity become extremely important. Sometimes it is inevitable that comm gets saturated but if we use proper comm discipline then things work out fine.


SnakeHandler may be showing his age by designating between UHF and VHF. Just like everything else, the radios have evolved so that we are no longer handcuffed by UHF and VHF radios. Therefore, we now use the distinction of PRI (primary) and AUX (auxiliary) to clarify what radio is being used since there is a wide gamut of the electromagnetic spectrum offered for use.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
outlaw162
PostPosted: Aug 01, 2011 - 01:30 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Feb 28, 2008 - 02:33 AM
Posts: 968

Status: Offline
Well, he's right around 2 1/2 years older now.

Good catch.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic