| Author |
Message |
|
tbarlow
|
Posted: Nov 25, 2008 - 05:14 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Nov 05, 2007 - 12:35 AM
Posts: 224
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Status: Offline
|
|
San Antonio Express News wrote:
AF wants to boot recruit with leukemia
By Sig Christenson - Express-News
Web Posted: 11/23/2008 10:47 CST
The Air Force has moved to deny health benefits to a recruit who learned he had acute leukemia only weeks into basic training at Lackland AFB.
An evaluation board ruled that Airman Basic Joseph Weston had fallen ill before coming to boot camp. It ordered him dismissed from duty with an administrative discharge — making him ineligible for medical and retirement benefits.
The ruling came despite the opinion of an Air Force cancer specialist who said there was “absolutely no way” to prove that Weston came to Lackland sick. The case is being appealed, with Weston fighting to win a discharge that grants him continued medical care and possibly even a pension.
“I feel I’m entitled to that,” he said. “I definitely feel that the Air Force owes me a medical discharge, if not retirement.”
As he fights to survive, Weston, 21, of Cadillac, Mich., is waging what he sees as a battle for honor. He joined the Air Force during a time of war, wanting to serve and defend his country and better himself.
But after telling him he had a rare form of cancer that could either kill him or leave him an invalid, an Air Force Physical Evaluation Board denied Weston a medical/honorable discharge, which would allow him to receive government-covered chemotherapy treatment for the next three years. It also could help him receive a 100 percent disability rating, which would allow him to qualify for medical retirement benefits.
In the absence of either one, he could qualify for Medicaid, but no one knows much about that possibility at the moment.
“I don’t know what’s in my future at this point,” Weston said. “I thought I had a good idea at one point, but it’s kind of been taken away from me, so I don’t really know at this point what I’m going to do, what I want to do anymore. It’s all just kind of been thrown up into the air, like a deck of cards.”
Living in isolation
As he marked his 21st birthday, Weston was living in isolation in a medical holding squadron where airmen who flunk their drug tests, the walking wounded and seriously ill are warehoused. He avoids others because of an immune system weakened by treatments. He wears a surgical mask when he walks in the cramped squadron building or elsewhere on base — if he has the strength to walk.
The windowless room Weston has lived in since his diagnosis June 10 isn’t much bigger than a prison cell. For a while he was denied the right to read books other than the Bible. Once, he was chastised by a noncommissioned officer for resting his eyes after grueling chemotherapy treatments.
The Air Force says strict discipline is normal for those in the medical holding squadron, where the rules are similar to those in other training units. He has since been allowed to read and sleep during the day, in accordance with doctors’ orders.
An angry Weston said some NCOs in the 319th Training Squadron, as it’s called, have treated him as if he were a recruit who flunked a drug test.
But worst of all is the Air Force’s decision to give him an administrative discharge.
Weston said some recruits he knows are getting medical discharges for stress fractures and anxiety attacks. He finds that ironic and insulting.
It makes matters worse that he can’t go home to his parents, who have watched from afar as their son fights a two-front war from his sickbed.
“What became his initial battle of life with the cancer is almost secondary with this battle he’s got with this discharge decision,” Jim Weston, his father, said in a telephone interview. “It just causes more stress for him, more stress for the family, and obviously it’s not pleasant.”
A long march
Wearing a surgical mask and blue armband, Weston stands at attention in a formation outside the 319th dorm as he and other recruits await orders on a chilly Monday.
This is a relatively short walk to a Lackland dining hall, but for him it is part of a long march with no clear destination.
“Why is my body doing it?” he said. “I know it is happening, but why me? Why now?”
This was supposed to be his year. After taking a hard look at his life, Weston had decided the time had come to join the Air Force. He qualified to be a jet engine mechanic and would have come to training months sooner if it had been his call.
The Air Force delayed his arrival to Lackland for five months. Weston, who had lived with a girlfriend and worked in a restaurant, moved home with his parents and anticipated the day he could get to boot camp. This was his chance to pick up a family tradition. Both of Weston’s grandfathers had been in uniform, and now it was his turn.
But the plane flight to Lackland at the end of Memorial Day weekend was also an escape from a nowhere job and Michigan’s moribund economy. It offered a chance for him to acquire discipline and direction in a life that had gone in circles.
Soon after starting boot camp, Weston showed signs of lagging in physical training, but it wasn’t cause for alarm. At first it was thought he wasn’t drinking enough water to compensate for the hot San Antonio summer. He also wasn’t used to exercising.
Tall and thin, Weston, like many boot camp recruits, had been a couch potato at home. His military doctor, pediatric oncologist Della Howell, also reported that he had taken Chantix, a drug to help him quit smoking. The drug’s many side effects include insomnia, which can cause fatigue and anemia.
Weston said he drank more water, but the problems persisted. He had swelling in his legs, and a medical check revealed an abnormally high heart rate long after exercising — 110 beats per minute.
Doctors at Wilford Hall Medical Center figured out what was wrong after blood tests: He had acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Called ALL, it’s typically seen in 3- to 4-year-old children, not young adults.
Weston called home. The gravity of the situation didn’t dawn on him until his mother, JoAnn Weston, broke down on the phone and said they were coming to be at his side.
“When he told me that they thought he had leukemia, to be very, very honest with you, I don’t remember what I said. I was in such a state of shock,” she said.
For Weston, the setback came just as things “had started to come together.”
“My dad, in fact, said quite a few times he felt jealous of me,” he continued. “It was like, ‘If I could go back right now 20 years, I’d switch places, I would, because you’ll be able to retire.’ He was just going through the benefits to it.
“I could tell he was really proud of me.”
Facing long odds
Weston had a better chance of being struck by lightning than coming down with ALL.
The government estimates your odds of being struck by lightning at 1 in 400,000. Just 90 people age 20 were diagnosed with all types of leukemia in the United States in 2000, the most recent statistics available to Howell. Of those 20-year-olds, she said, perhaps a third to a little more than half suffered from ALL.
ALL’s young victims, a subset of that group, have a better chance of survival than Weston.
“Anyone over the age of 10 is considered high risk, and that puts his survival rate at 60 or 65 percent,” Howell said.
Leukemia cells divide quickly and crowd the bone marrow. As they fill up the marrow, it becomes more difficult for the body to produce normal red blood cells that create platelets. When that happens, you bruise and bleed more easily and have increased difficulty in fighting off infections.
Adults with chronic leukemia can live for years. That is far more problematic with ALL.
“I’ve seen some children come in with an infection at the time of diagnosis and die that day. I’ve seen others have leukemia smolder in their bodies for months, and for some reason their bodies are just able to handle it better,” said Howell, 35, of Helotes. “In this case, had Airman Basic Weston not come in for treatment, if he had never had received any chemotherapy, I’d say that it could have easily taken his life in a matter of weeks.”
The question before the Physical Evaluation Board headed by Air Force Lt. Col. James Waggle was whether Weston was sick even before arriving at Lackland. He ruled the recruit was unfit to serve due to a physical disability but that it wasn’t incurred while on duty.
Waggle also said he wasn’t sure Weston’s impairment was permanent. After consulting with Wilford Hall’s adult hematology/oncology department, he wrote that “the board feels that there is compelling evidence to warrant a finding that the ALL existed before your entrance on active duty.”
Kenny Pruitt, a spokesman at the Air Force Personnel Center where the board is based, said the board could not comment on details of the case.
But Howell said Weston’s treatment could cause permanent, life-altering injuries. Howell also said that she thinks the board saw a letter she wrote insisting that Weston’s cancer was not a pre-existing condition.
The letter, obtained by the Express-News, said tests and past studies indicate that he would have had a normal amount of “blasts,” or leukemia cells, in his bone marrow on the day he entered training.
“Following this reasoning, Airman Weston had 2 percent blasts (a normal number) when he arrived in San Antonio, and he did not technically have ‘leukemia’ until 5 June 2008,” she wrote.
“Based on Airman Weston’s clinical history and laboratory findings, there is absolutely no way to prove that he did in fact have leukemia as a ‘pre-existing condition,’” Howell added. “The cell life cycle of acute leukemia cells seems to support that he did not have leukemia on arrival to San Antonio on 27 May 2008 for basic training. Therefore, there is no way that I can support the classification of this illness as a pre-existing condition.”
Bearing up
Weston is doing well despite intensive chemotherapy. He takes pills each day, gets shots in his legs and has a catheter in his chest, and undergoes a monthly spinal tap. He had three spinal taps in his first month of care.
The drugs he’s taking attack cancer cells during their life cycles. Chemo tends to kill rapidly dividing cells, among them ones that cause cancer and others linked to hair growth.
Since cancer cells can quickly develop a resistance to a single chemotherapy agent, different types of drugs are used to combat the cancer. The side effects of the drugs include hair loss, tumbling blood counts, mouth sores and loss of appetite.
As the week began, Weston sat alone at a table for five in one of Lackland’s dining halls eating a spaghetti sandwich. He hadn’t touched the baked potato on a smaller dish, but his appetite has been good thanks to the steroids doctors have given him.
Still, nothing can be done to stop Weston from feeling as if he’s been stranded. Airmen sit three to four at a table in front of him, some holding conversations under their breaths — a violation of the rule against talking but one tolerated by boot camp trainers through the years.
Though Weston’s dream of serving out his six-year contract is over, as is his hope to earn a college degree while in the Air Force, he still lives under military discipline — a 4:45 a.m. daily wakeup call, marching to the dining hall in formation and ending his sentences with “sir” or “ma’am.”
Weston’s blue armband tells trainers he is a recruit in need of continued medical care. He resents some of the trainees who wear orange armbands because they’re being banished from the Air Force for failing to meet the service’s standards. It may be that he envies the ones with green armbands because they’re working to improve their strength as part of Lackland’s “Get Fit” program.
They have hope of staying in the Air Force.
He’s on his way out, as soon as his case is resolved — which could be in as little as six weeks or as long as six months, he’s been told.
“We are all treated equally. There’s no difference in the way we are treated. Now, I didn’t choose to have cancer. I didn’t choose to get kicked out because of that, but I get treated the same as if somebody — I don’t think it’s right, I don’t think it’s fair,” Weston said.
He is seated at a table in a briefing room. Behind him to his left, a helmet rests atop a rifle beside a pair of desert combat boots — the traditional trappings used to honor a fallen soldier.
Finding himself in the same circumstance as recruits who flunked their drug test makes no sense to him.
“It really makes me mad,” Weston said, and then he began to cry.
“It’s like I get stereotyped in with them, and I didn’t do it,” he said. “I would give anything to switch, and I can’t. But all they worry about is, ‘Oh my God, I have three weeks left!’ And I’m sitting here, and I hope I can go home in three months, and I have a serious problem.”
source: http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/local_ ... kemia.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Jun 19, 2013 - 6:50 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
specs343579
|
Posted: Nov 25, 2008 - 06:23 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Feb 14, 2008 - 06:07 PM
Posts: 54
Status: Offline
|
This is a sickening story that really shows the incompentence of the USAF and their leaders! My father inlaw was diagnosed with leukemia when he was 26...he is now 46 and I can tell you first hand that the aftermath of all the treatment is aweful. I hear stories of what my father in-law went through with the chemotherapy and they are not nice stories. To think this kid is sitting at the 319th alone going through the most trying time in his life is unbelievable. I believe this kid 100% when he says they treat all of them the same. Let me tell you the recruits that end up in the 319th are viewed as scum even if they are not.
Like they said in the article... the blood test and blood counts tell you everything. What were his blood counts at MEPS? what were they when he entered Lackland? and what where they weeks later when he was diagnosed? It really pisses me off that the AF is acting like an insurance company saying that this was pre-existing condition. You basically have some doctor who probably finished in the bottom 10% at med school and this is the doctor who is deciding this kids separation from the AF. Mean while the kid is being treated like crap at the 319th. you know the Nazi's made the jews wear arm bands too!!!!
another question.... is the air force medical team the most capable at handling this type of diagnosis? I highly doubt it. I know that Penn University in Philly is probably more capable then the AF is. This story just got me fired up!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sweetpete
|
Posted: Nov 25, 2008 - 06:47 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Jan 11, 2004 - 08:33 PM
Posts: 302
Status: Offline
|
| This is a load of Bull****, the AF is so Fing wrong its ridiculous. This kid wanted to serve his country and before he got his feet wet it was taken away from him. WTF, how on earth is there not one influential piece of brass who has visibility on this that has said wrong, were gonna take care of him. I hope he wins his appeals, somebody should get this on dateline or something. Big Blue cant stand any more bad press right now, back them into a corner if they have to. |
_________________ F-16A/B/C/D Mech AZ ANG/Top Gun
F/A-18A/B/C/D Mech Top Gun
F-14A Mech Top Gun
UH-60A/L Driver NV ARNG
|
|
|
|
 |
|
nam11b
|
Posted: Nov 25, 2008 - 06:53 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: May 29, 2008 - 10:46 AM
Posts: 268
Status: Offline
|
| I have seen the military and the VA abused several times with b.s claims of injury and seen guys get a medical discharge. Here is a perfect example of a credible claim and the kid is getting treated like crap! Hopefully this will get enough publicity and that AF can save face. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
akruse21
|
Posted: Nov 25, 2008 - 07:45 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jul 30, 2005 - 12:38 PM
Posts: 810
Status: Offline
|
| That ****** bitch Metzger gets full retirement and disability while this kid with a no sh*t pretty good chance dying illness gets treated for his disease in a prison without his family. What a crock of sh*t. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
ATFS_Crash
|
Posted: Nov 25, 2008 - 07:51 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Dec 15, 2006 - 12:28 AM
Posts: 760
|
I think the Air Force is within their rights, however in this case it seems like they are choosing the wrong moral direction. I would decline disability if it was a condition that the airman knew he had (and if he hid it) prior to joining the military or if his medical condition was related to criminal activity, mischief or dereliction. (Which in this case doesn't seem to be the case)
I would probably consider this a hardship case: and would probably let him serve out his term ( let him have benefits for the duration of his term) and probably let him qualify for lifetime benefits.
This leukemia case is borderline so it only stirs up my dandruff a little.
------
-----
-----
There was another case that really ruffled my feathers and dandruff and made blood shoot out of my eyes (figure of speech of course).
There was a soldier that was injured in Iraq by IED (or some other explosion). He received a brain injury from shrapnel. The military apparently did an excellent job of saving his life and with his initial treatment. However I feel that once he got back to the states he was neglected to such a degree that I would consider it criminal and slanderous.
I think for privacy reasons they wouldn’t say what he had; but he was declined full disability because the bureaucracy of socialized medicine and managed health care claimed he had pre-existing conditions.
I suspect the soldier had some pre-existing condition like ADD or dyslexia. However it must have been minor because he was qualified enough to make it into the military, through training and to serve in combat in Iraq. I feel he did his full responsibility in service of his country (risked his life doing dangerous work in combat for his country); thusly he should be allowed full benefits.
I suspect that the bureaucracy of socialized medicine is just latching onto some minor unrelated pre-existing condition to try to dodge responsibility and as a cost-cutting measure.
I feel it is not an ethical cost-cutting measure to let those that have sacrificed so much for our country to wither on the vine.
This soldier’s brain injury was significant enough that he drools and needs help with everyday things like dressing. He was going to need lots of physical therapy and probably some nursing assistance. If I remember correctly he had a wife and children that were dependent on his income. His wife essentially was providing him with nursing care; yet from what I understand he was being denied full medical and income benefits and was only allotted a percentage of benefits.
I feel that when you join the military that it’s much like being a family and that a reasonable effort should be made to care for those that can’t care for themselves; particularly if they are injured in the line of duty; particularly if it is in combat.
I feel that our servicemen get some of the best and worst healthcare that there is. It seems that since the Carter administration/cutbacks that the healthcare and benefits have been getting worse for US servicemen. It seems that since then there has been an increase of the status quo of lowering of standards, withering on the vine and getting the runaround ( unnecessary neglectful bureaucracy).
I think this type of bureaucratic flimflam is a symptom of socialized medicine. I fear that our country is running toward a system of socialized medicine. So I fear that this type of bureaucratic flimflam might become more of a status quo.
I can’t remember the name of this individual and can’t find a news link to his story. I don’t know how his story turned out; perhaps he’s won an appeal. From what I understand there are many servicemen that are in a similar boat. If anyone can remember his name or knows of a link to the news stories about him, please let me know.
Time to drink some more caffeine, too early to go to my cave. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Driver
|
Posted: Nov 25, 2008 - 08:54 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Aug 13, 2005 - 07:14 PM
Posts: 185
Status: Offline
|
| Treating a leukemia patient like a drugs junky... Now I know I'm not supposed to say this but seriously "within their right"? They'd practically hang people publicly if civilians did anything like this. And to be quite honest I wouldn't see injustice in the responsible officers catching a bullet somewhere in a dark alleyway. |
Last edited by Driver on Nov 25, 2008 - 09:08 PM; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
 |
|
akruse21
|
Posted: Nov 25, 2008 - 09:03 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jul 30, 2005 - 12:38 PM
Posts: 810
Status: Offline
|
| They could kiss my leukemia infected a$$ as I was walking out the door. My grandparents both went through chemo and radiation. It's no joke at all. Can't imagine doing it while maintaining hospital corners on my bed. Madness. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
ATFS_Crash
|
Posted: Nov 25, 2008 - 09:09 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Dec 15, 2006 - 12:28 AM
Posts: 760
|
I don’t think this is the same story as I was referring to because these individuals seem to have lost all of their benefits; however the story is close enough that I think it is relevant and I think it is relevant to the story that started this thread.
Basically as a cost-cutting measure some morally bankrupt bureaucrats apparently use any reason they can to deny legitimate claims. Whether it to be to claim/imply an individual has a learning disability, mental illness, drug abuse, etc…
Quote:
How Specialist Town Lost His Benefits
By Joshua Kors
This article appeared in the April 9, 2007 edition of The Nation.
March 29, 2007
Jon Town has spent the last few years fighting two battles, one against his body, the other against the US Army. Both began in October 2004 in Ramadi, Iraq. He was standing in the doorway of his battalion's headquarters when a 107-millimeter rocket struck two feet above his head. The impact punched a piano-sized hole in the concrete facade, sparked a huge fireball and tossed the 25-year-old Army specialist to the floor, where he lay blacked out among the rubble.
"The next thing I remember is waking up on the ground." Men from his unit had gathered around his body and were screaming his name. "They started shaking me. But I was numb all over," he says. "And it's weird because... because for a few minutes you feel like you're not really there. I could see them, but I couldn't hear them. I couldn't hear anything. I started shaking because I thought I was dead."
Eventually the rocket shrapnel was removed from Town's neck and his ears stopped leaking blood. But his hearing never really recovered, and in many ways, neither has his life. A soldier honored twelve times during his seven years in uniform, Town has spent the last three struggling with deafness, memory failure and depression. By September 2006 he and the Army agreed he was no longer combat-ready.
But instead of sending Town to a medical board and discharging him because of his injuries, doctors at Fort Carson, Colorado, did something strange: They claimed Town's wounds were actually caused by a "personality disorder." Town was then booted from the Army and told that under a personality disorder discharge, he would never receive disability or medical benefits.
Town is not alone. A six-month investigation has uncovered multiple cases in which soldiers wounded in Iraq are suspiciously diagnosed as having a personality disorder, then prevented from collecting benefits. The conditions of their discharge have infuriated many in the military community, including the injured soldiers and their families, veterans' rights groups, even military officials required to process these dismissals.
They say the military is purposely misdiagnosing soldiers like Town and that it's doing so for one reason: to cheat them out of a lifetime of disability and medical benefits, thereby saving billions in expenses.
The Fine Print
In the Army's separations manual it's called Regulation 635-200, Chapter 5-13: "Separation Because of Personality Disorder." It's an alluring choice for a cash-strapped military because enacting it is quick and cheap. The Department of Veterans Affairs doesn't have to provide medical care to soldiers dismissed with personality disorder. That's because under Chapter 5-13, personality disorder is a pre-existing condition. The VA is only required to treat wounds sustained during service.
Soldiers discharged under 5-13 can't collect disability pay either. To receive those benefits, a soldier must be evaluated by a medical board, which must confirm that he is wounded and that his wounds stem from combat. The process takes several months, in contrast with a 5-13 discharge, which can be wrapped up in a few days.
If a soldier dismissed under 5-13 hasn't served out his contract, he has to give back a slice of his re-enlistment bonus as well. That amount is often larger than the soldier's final paycheck. As a result, on the day of their discharge, many injured vets learn that they owe the Army several thousand dollars.
One military official says doctors at his base are doing more than withholding this information from wounded soldiers; they're actually telling them the opposite: that if they go along with a 5-13, they'll get to keep their bonus and receive disability and medical benefits. The official, who demanded anonymity, handles discharge papers at a prominent Army facility. He says the soldiers he works with know they don't have a personality disorder. "But the doctors are telling them, this will get you out quicker, and the VA will take care of you. To stay out of Iraq, a soldier will take that in a heartbeat. What they don't realize is, those things are lies. The soldiers, they don't read the fine print," he says. "They don't know to ask for a med board. They're taking the word of the doctors. Then they sit down with me and find out what a 5-13 really means--they're shocked."
Russell Terry, founder of the Iraq War Veterans Organization (IWVO), says he's watched this scenario play itself out many times. For more than a year, his veterans' rights group has been receiving calls from distraught soldiers discharged under Chapter 5-13. Most, he says, say their military doctors pushed the personality disorder diagnosis, strained to prove that their problems existed before their service in Iraq and refused to acknowledge evidence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injury and physical traumas, which would allow them to collect disability and medical benefits.
"These soldiers are coming home from Iraq with all kinds of problems," Terry says. "They go to the VA for treatment, and they're turned away. They're told, 'No, you have a pre-existing condition, something from childhood.'" That leap in logic boils Terry's blood. "Everybody receives a psychological screening when they join the military. What I want to know is, if all these soldiers really did have a severe pre-existing condition, how did they get into the military in the first place?"
Terry says that trying to reverse a 5-13 discharge is a frustrating process. A soldier has to claw through a thicket of paperwork, appeals panels and backstage political dealing, and even with the guidance of an experienced advocate, few are successful. "The 5-13," he says, "it's like a scarlet letter you can't get taken off."
In the last six years the Army has diagnosed and discharged more than 5,600 soldiers because of personality disorder, according to the Defense Department. And the numbers keep rising: 805 cases in 2001, 980 cases in 2003, 1,086 from January to November 2006. "It's getting worse and worse every day," says the official who handles discharge papers. "At my office the numbers started out normal. Now it's up to three or four soldiers each day. It's like, suddenly everybody has a personality disorder."
The reason is simple, he says. "They're saving a buck. And they're saving the VA money too. It's all about money."
Exactly how much money is difficult to calculate. Defense Department records show that across the entire armed forces, more than 22,500 soldiers have been dismissed due to personality disorder in the last six years. How much those soldiers would have collected in disability pay would have been determined by a medical board, which evaluates just how disabled a veteran is. A completely disabled soldier receives about $44,000 a year. In a recent study on the cost of veterans' benefits for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, Harvard professor Linda Bilmes estimates an average disability payout of $8,890 per year and a future life expectancy of forty years for soldiers returning from service.
Using those figures, by discharging soldiers under Chapter 5-13, the military could be saving upwards of $8 billion in disability pay. Add to that savings the cost of medical care over the soldiers' lifetimes. Bilmes estimates that each year the VA spends an average of $5,000 in medical care per veteran. Applying those numbers, by discharging 22,500 soldiers because of personality disorder, the military saves $4.5 billion in medical care over their lifetimes.
Town says Fort Carson psychologist Mark Wexler assured him that he would receive disability benefits, VA medical care and that he'd get to keep his bonus--good news he discussed with Christian Fields and Brandon Murray, two soldiers in his unit at Fort Carson. "We talked about it many times," Murray says. "Jon said the doctor there promised him benefits, and he was happy about it. Who wouldn't be?" Town shared that excitement with his wife, Kristy, shortly after his appointment with Wexler. "He said that Wexler had explained to him that he'd get to keep his benefits," Kristy says, "that the doctor had looked into it, and it was all coming with the chapter he was getting."
In fact, Town would not get disability pay or receive long-term VA medical care. And he would have to give back the bulk of his $15,000 bonus. Returning that money meant Town would leave Fort Carson less than empty-handed: He now owed the Army more than $3,000. "We had this on our heads the whole way, driving home to Ohio," says Town. Wexler made him promises, he says, about what would happen if he went along with the diagnosis. "The final day, we find out, none of it was true. It was a total shock. I felt like I'd been betrayed by the Army."
Wexler denies discussing benefits with Town. In a statement, the psychologist writes, "I have never discussed benefits with my patients as that is not my area of expertise. The only thing I said to Spc. Town was that the Chapter 5-13 is an honorable discharge.... I assure you, after over 15 years in my position, both as active duty and now civilian, I don't presume to know all the details about benefits and therefore do not discuss them with my patients."
Wexler's boss, Col. Steven Knorr, chief of the Department of Behavioral Health at Evans Army Hospital, declined to speak about Town's case. When asked if doctors at Fort Carson were assuring patients set for a 5-13 discharge that they'll receive disability benefits and keep their bonuses, Knorr said, "I don't believe they're doing that."
Not the Man He Used to Be
Interviews with soldiers diagnosed with personality disorder suggest that the military is using the psychological condition as a catch-all diagnosis, encompassing symptoms as diverse as deafness, headaches and schizophrenic delusions. That flies in the face of the Army's own regulations.
According to those regulations, to be classified a personality disorder, a soldier's symptoms had to exist before he joined the military. And they have to match the "personality disorder" described in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the national standard for psychiatric diagnosis. Town's case provides a clear window into how these personality disorder diagnoses are being used because even a cursory examination of his case casts grave doubt as to whether he fits either criterion.
Town's wife, for one, laughs in disbelief at the idea that her husband was suffering from hearing loss before he headed to Iraq. But since returning, she says, he can't watch TV unless the volume is full-blast, can't use the phone unless its volume is set to high. Medical papers from Fort Carson list Town as having no health problems before serving in Iraq; after, a Fort Carson audiologist documents "functional (non-organic) hearing loss." Town says his right ear, his "good" ear, has lost 50 percent of its hearing; his left is still essentially useless.
He is more disturbed by how his memory has eroded. Since the rocket blast, he has struggled to retain new information. "Like, I'll be driving places, and then I totally forget where I'm going," he says. "Numbers, names, dates--unless I knew them before, I pretty much don't remember." When Town returned to his desk job at Fort Carson, he found himself straining to recall the Army's regulations. "People were like, 'What are you, dumb?' And I'm like, 'No, I'm probably smarter than you. I just can't remember stuff,'" he says, his melancholy suddenly replaced by anger. "They don't understand--I got hit by a rocket."
Those bursts of rage mark the biggest change, says Kristy Town. She says the man she married four years ago was "a real goofball. He'd do funny voices and faces--a great Jim Carrey imitation. When the kids would get a boo-boo, he'd fall on the ground and pretend he got a boo-boo too." Now, she says, "his emotions are all over the place. He'll get so angry at things, and it's not toward anybody. It's toward himself. He blames himself for everything." He has a hard time sleeping and doesn't spend as much time as he used to with the kids. "They get rowdy when they play, and he just has to be alone. It's almost like his nerves can't handle it."
Kristy begins to cry, pauses, before forcing herself to continue. She's been watching him when he's alone, she says. "He kind of... zones out, almost like he's in a daze."
In May 2006 Town tried to electrocute himself, dropping his wife's hair dryer into the bathtub. The dryer short-circuited before it could electrify the water. Fort Carson officials put Town in an off-post hospital that specializes in suicidal depression. Town had been promoted to corporal after returning from Iraq; he was stripped of that rank and reduced back to specialist. "When he came back, I tried to be the same," Kristy says. "He just can't. He's definitely not the man he used to be."
Town says his dreams have changed too. They keep taking him back to Ramadi, to the death of a good friend who'd been too near an explosion, taken too much shrapnel to the face. In his dreams Town returns there night after night to soak up the blood.
He stops his description for a rare moment of levity. "Sleep didn't use to be like that," he says. "I used to sleep just fine."
How the Army determined then that Town's behavioral problems existed before his military service is unclear. Wexler, the Fort Carson psychologist who made the diagnosis, didn't interview any of Town's family or friends. It's unclear whether he even questioned Town's fellow soldiers in 2-17 Field Artillery, men like Fields, Murray and Michael Forbus, who could have testified to his stability and award-winning performance before the October 2004 rocket attack. As Forbus puts it, before the attack Town was "one of the best in our unit"; after, "the son of a gun was deaf in one ear. He seemed lost and disoriented. It just took the life out of him."
Town finds his diagnosis especially strange because the Diagnostic Manual appears to preclude cases like his. It says that a pattern of erratic behavior cannot be labeled a "personality disorder" if it's from a head injury. The specialist asserts that his hearing loss, headaches and anger all began with the rocket attack that knocked him unconscious.
Wexler did not reply to repeated requests seeking comment on Town's diagnosis. But Col. Knorr of Fort Carson's Evans hospital says he's confident his doctors are properly diagnosing personality disorder. The colonel says there is a simple explanation as to why in so many cases the lifelong condition of personality disorder isn't apparent until after serving in Iraq. Traumatic experiences, Knorr says, can trigger a condition that has lain dormant for years. "They may have done fine in high school and before, but it comes out during the stress of service."
"I've never heard of that occurring," says Keith Armstrong, a clinical professor with the Department of Psychiatry at the University of California, San Francisco. Armstrong has been counseling traumatized veterans for more than twenty years at the San Francisco VA; most recently he is the co-author of Courage After Fire: Coping Strategies for Troops Returning From Iraq and Afghanistan and Their Families. "Personality disorder is a diagnosis I'm very cautious about," he says. "My question would be, has PTSD been ruled out? It seems to me that if it walks like a duck, looks like a duck, let's see if it's a duck before other factors are implicated."
Knorr admits that in most cases, before making a diagnosis, his doctors only interview the soldier. But he adds that interviewing family members, untrained to recognize signs of personality disorder, would be of limited value. "The soldier's perception and their parents' perception is that they were fine. But maybe they didn't or weren't able to see that wasn't the case."
Armstrong takes a very different approach. He says family is a "crucial part" of the diagnosis and treatment of soldiers returning from war. The professor sees parents and wives as so important, he encourages his soldiers to invite their families into the counseling sessions. "They bring in particular information that can be helpful," he says. "By not taking advantage of their knowledge and support, I think we're doing soldiers a disservice."
Knorr would not discuss the specifics of Town's case. He did note, however, that his department treats thousands of soldiers each year and says within that population, there are bound to be a small fraction of misdiagnosed cases and dissatisfied soldiers. He adds that the soldiers he's seen diagnosed and discharged with personality disorder are "usually quite pleased."
The Army holds soldiers' medical records and contact information strictly confidential. But The Nation was able to locate a half-dozen soldiers from bases across the country who were diagnosed with personality disorder. All of them rejected that diagnosis. Most said military doctors tried to force the diagnosis upon them and turned a blind eye to symptoms of PTSD and physical injury.
One such veteran, Richard Dykstra, went to the hospital at Fort Stewart, Georgia, complaining of flashbacks, anger and stomach pains. The doctor there diagnosed personality disorder. Dykstra thinks the symptoms actually stem from PTSD and a bilateral hernia he suffered in Iraq. "When I told her my symptoms, she said, 'Oh, it looks like you've been reading up on PTSD.' Then she basically said I was making it all up," he says.
In her report on Dykstra, Col. Ana Parodi, head of Behavioral Health at Fort Stewart's Winn Army Hospital, writes that the soldier gives a clear description of PTSD symptoms but lays them out with such detail, it's "as if he had memorized the criteria." She concludes that Dykstra has personality disorder, not PTSD, though her report also notes that Dykstra has had "no previous psychiatric history" and that she confirmed the validity of his symptoms with the soldier's wife.
Parodi is currently on leave and could not be reached for comment. Speaking for Fort Stewart, Public Affairs Officer Lieut. Col. Randy Martin says that the Army's diagnosis procedures "have been developed over time, and they are accepted as being fair." Martin said he could not address Dykstra's case specifically because his files have been moved to a storage facility in St. Louis.
William Wooldridge had a similar fight with the Army. The specialist was hauling missiles and tank ammunition outside Baghdad when, he says, a man standing at the side of the road grabbed hold of a young girl and pushed her in front of his truck. "The little girl," Wooldridge says, his voice suddenly quiet, "she looked like one of my daughters."
When he returned to Fort Polk, Louisiana, Wooldridge told his doctor that he was now hearing voices and seeing visions, hallucinations of a mangled girl who would ask him why he had killed her. His doctor told him he had personality disorder. "When I heard that, I flew off the handle because I said, 'Hey, that ain't me. Before I went over there, I was a happy-go-lucky kind of guy.'" Wooldridge says his psychologist, Capt. Patrick Brady of Baynes-Jones Army Community Hospital, saw him for thirty minutes before making his diagnosis. Soon after, Wooldridge was discharged from Fort Polk under Chapter 5-13.
He began to fight that discharge immediately, without success. Then in March 2005, eighteen months after Wooldridge's dismissal, his psychiatrist at the Memphis VA filed papers rejecting Brady's diagnosis and asserting that Wooldridge suffered from PTSD so severe, it made him "totally disabled." Weeks later the Army Discharge Review Board voided Wooldridge's 5-13 dismissal, but the eighteen months he'd spent lingering without benefits had already taken its toll.
"They put me out on the street to rot, and if I had left things like they were, there would have been no way I could have survived. I would have had to take myself out or had someone do it for me," he says. The way they use personality disorder to diagnose and discharge, he says, "it's like a mental rape. That's the only way I can describe it."
Captain Brady has since left Fort Polk and is now on staff at Fort Wainwright, Alaska; recently he deployed to Iraq and was unavailable for comment. In a statement, Maj. Byron Strother, chief of the Department of Behavioral Health at Baynes-Jones hospital, writes that allegations that soldiers at Fort Polk are being misdiagnosed "are not true." Strother says diagnoses at his hospital are made "only after careful consideration of all relevant clinical observation, direct examination [and] appropriate testing."
If there are dissatisfied soldiers, says Knorr, the Fort Carson official, "I'll bet not a single one of them has been diagnosed with conditions that are clear-cut and makes them medically unfit, like schizophrenia."
Linda Mosier disputes that. When her son Chris left for Iraq in 2004, he was a "normal kid," she says, who'd call her long-distance and joke about the strange food and expensive taxis overseas. When he returned home for Christmas 2005, "he wouldn't sit down for a meal with us. He just kept walking around. I took him to the department store for slacks, and he was inside rushing around saying, 'Let's go, let's go, let's go.' He wouldn't sleep, and the one time he did, he woke up screaming."
Mosier told his mother of a breaking point in Iraq: a roadside bomb that blew up the truck in front of his. "He said his buddies were screaming. They were on fire," she says, her voice trailing off. "He was there at the end to pick up the hands and arms." After that Mosier started having delusions. Dr. Wexler of Fort Carson diagnosed personality disorder. Soon after, Mosier was discharged under Chapter 5-13.
Mosier returned home, still plagued by visions. In October he put a note on the front door of their Des Moines, Iowa, home saying the Iraqis were after him and he had to protect the family, then shot himself.
Mosier's mother is furious that doctors at Fort Carson treated her son for such a brief period of time and that Wexler, citing confidentiality, refused to tell her anything about that treatment or give her family any direction on how to help Chris upon his return home. She does not believe her son had a personality disorder. "They take a normal kid, he comes back messed up, then nobody was there for him when he came back," Linda says. "They discharged him so they didn't have to treat him."
Wexler did not reply to a written request seeking comment on Mosier's case.
Thrown to the Wolves
Today Jon Town is home, in small-town Findlay, Ohio, with no job, no prospects and plenty of time to reflect on how he got there. Diagnosing him with personality disorder may have saved the Army thousands of dollars, he says, but what did Wexler have to gain?
Quite a lot, says Steve Robinson, director of veterans affairs at Veterans for America, a Washington, DC-based soldiers' rights group. Since the Iraq War began, he says, doctors have been facing an overflow of wounded soldiers and a shortage of rooms, supplies and time to treat them. By calling PTSD a personality disorder, they usher one soldier out quickly, freeing up space for the three or four who are waiting.
Terry, the veterans' advocate from IWVO, notes that unlike doctors in the private sector, Army doctors who give questionable diagnoses face no danger of malpractice suits due to Feres v. U.S., a 1950 Supreme Court ruling that bars soldiers from suing for negligence. To maintain that protection, Terry says, most doctors will diagnose personality disorder when prodded to do so by military officials.
That's precisely how the system works, says one military official familiar with the discharge process. The official, who requested anonymity, is a lawyer with Trial Defense Services (TDS), a unit of the Army that guides soldiers through their 5-13 discharge. "Commanders want to get these guys out the door and get it done fast. Even if the next soldier isn't as good, at least he's good to go. He's deployable. So they're telling the docs what diagnosis to give to get what discharge."
The lawyer says he knows this is happening because commanders have told him that they're doing it. "Some have come to me and talked about doing this. They're saying, 'Give me a specific diagnosis. It'll support a certain chapter.'"
Colonel Martin of Fort Stewart said the prospect of commanders pressuring doctors to diagnose personality disorder is "highly unlikely." "Doctors are making these determinations themselves," Martin says. In a statement, Col. William Statz, commander at Fort Polk's Baynes-Jones hospital, says, "Any allegations that clinical decisions are influenced by either political considerations or command pressures, at any level, are untrue."
But a second TDS lawyer, who also demanded anonymity, says he's watched the same process play out at his base. "What I've noticed is right before a unit deploys, we see a spike in 5-13s, as if the commanders are trying to clean house, get rid of the soldiers they don't really need," he says. "The chain of command just wants to eliminate them and get a new body in there fast to plug up the holes." If anyone shows even moderate signs of psychological distress, he says, "they're kicking them to the curb instead of treating them."
Both lawyers say that once a commander steps in and pushes for a 5-13, the diagnosis and discharge are carved in stone fairly fast. After that happens, one lawyer says he points soldiers toward the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, where a 5-13 label could be overturned, and failing that, advises them to seek redress from their representative in Congress. Town did that, contacting Republican Representative Michael Oxley of Ohio, with little success. Oxley, who has since retired, did not return calls seeking comment.
Few cases are challenged successfully or overturned later, say the TDS lawyers. The system, says one, is essentially broken. "Right now, the Army is eating its own. What I want to see is these soldiers getting the right diagnosis, so they can get the right help, not be thrown to the wolves right away. That is what they're doing."
Still, Town tries to remain undaunted. He got his story to Robinson of Veterans for America, who brought papers on his case to an October meeting with several top Washington officials, including Deputy Surgeon General Gale Pollock, Assistant Surgeon General Bernard DeKoning and Republican Senator Kit Bond of Missouri. There Robinson laid out the larger 5-13 problem and submitted a briefing specifically on Town.
"We got a very positive response," Robinson says. "After we presented, they were almost appalled, like we are every day. They said, 'We didn't know this was happening.'" Robinson says the deputy surgeon general promised to look into Town's case and the others presented to her. Senator Bond, whose son has served in Iraq, floated the idea of a Congressional hearing if the 5-13 issue isn't resolved. The senator did not return calls seeking comment.
In the meantime, Town is doing his best to keep his head in check. He says his nightmares have been waning in recent weeks, but most of his problems persist. He's thinking of going to a veterans support group in Toledo, forty-five miles north of Findlay. There will be guys there who have been through this, he says, vets who understand.
Town hesitates, his voice suddenly much softer. "I have my good days and my bad days," he says. "It all depends on whether I wake up in Findlay or Iraq."
Source
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070409/kors
Another alarming disturbing trend is people that are in severe pain are often denied pain medication and portrayed as drug addicts. I feel there is a big difference between a person who legitimately needs drugs for pain; and a person that uses drugs to get stoned. Even people that legitimately need pain medication can develop a tolerance and an addiction; and I feel it is unfair and unethical to try to stereotype them as “drug addicts” even though some of them may technically be addicted to drugs.
I have known people that have refused medical treatment (such as chemotherapy) because they didn’t want to prolong the pain and suffering. I have known people that have attempted or succeeded at suicide because they were in such bad pain and so-called medical experts refused to give them pain medication.
I really hate how some people get away with abusing the system; and how some people are abused by the system. I’ve known medical staff that distribute narcotics (and other commonly abused medications like anti-anxiety drugs) to other medical staff for something as trivial as PMS or something self-inflicted like a hangover; yet they deny patients with legitimate severe injuries pain medication. There doesn’t seem to be any paperwork changing hands so that makes me think that the medicals staff is skimming pain medication from patients who legitimately need it so that they can abuse it trivially or recreationally.
End of rant, at least for now. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
vinnie
|
Posted: Nov 26, 2008 - 12:28 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Feb 06, 2004 - 03:37 AM
Posts: 436
Status: Offline
|
| MEPS most likely dropped the ball, If they retire this kid they will have to go back 50 years and retire everyone who had an admin discharge who is still alive. Wonder how long he was in delayed entry because he developed acute Leukemia just a few weeks into basic? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
TC
|
Posted: Nov 26, 2008 - 02:04 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Moderator

Joined: Jan 14, 2004 - 07:06 AM
Posts: 4006
Status: Offline
|
What I don't get, is why the girl that died from BMT crud last year was able to remain on active duty, and at that was ceremoniously allowed to "graduate" Basic, when the docs and her familly were all certain that there was little, if any hope left.
Why? Because there was no proof that she wasn't sick beforehand? It doesn't seem as though anyone could really prove this kid was sick beforehand either. It's such a double-standard. F*cking bull$hit.
Now, I could understand that if the AF could PROVE that he intentionally withheld information, and/or lied about his condition at MEPS, then the less-than-honorable discharge would make sense.
Well, I hope the Big Willie Medical Hobby Shop can work some wonders for the kid, and I hope his appeals work out for him too. |
_________________ "He counted on America to be passive...He counted wrong." -- President Ronald Reagan
|
|
|
|
 |
|
ptplauthor
|
Posted: Nov 26, 2008 - 03:52 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Nov 02, 2008 - 12:09 AM
Posts: 732
Location: Titletown, USA
Status: Offline
|
I think the main problem is that the military doesn't spend as much care and time with the people doing the fighting than with the weapons they use to do the fighting.
If the cancer was preexisting, wouldn't it show up on a blood test, Leukemia is afterall a blood cancer? |
_________________ Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
|
|
|
|
 |
|
specs343579
|
Posted: Nov 26, 2008 - 10:35 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Feb 14, 2008 - 06:07 PM
Posts: 54
Status: Offline
|
| Here is an analogy that many people should understand..."it happened on your shift." I am sure many people here have had things happen to them while they are in charge. Although there is nothing that could have been done to prevent it you still have to take responsibility and show leadership and accept the outcome and move foward. I know the military is built around the idea that everything is earned and no matter what you do there is still those who have come before. I know people have problems because this guy really hasn't "earned" a retirement because he hasn't put in his dues. But the bottom line is that it happened on the USAF's shift. Wether something happens within the first minute of someones shift or just before walking out the door you still have to take responsibility wether you like it or not. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
AfterburnerDecalsScott
|
Posted: Nov 26, 2008 - 11:22 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: May 10, 2005 - 07:45 PM
Posts: 1246
Status: Offline
|
Recall there was a story....I think it was Bud Anderson's book where one of the F-105s aloft for the new wing commander's change of command made a wheels up landing, and the new guy is mortified because it goes on his record....been wing king for 20 minutes, already had a crash.
Bottom line is, the kid joined with every intention of serving, you can't "prove" when you got leukemia like you can with pregnancy, and parcing diseases like that is a slipery slope. How many guys have MIs and strokes every year who joined up with genetic predisposition of heart disease? If you show up diabetic on active duty, you walked in with it....it just hadn't manifested itself yet.
I'd be caught AWOL and in a decent hospital someplace. |
_________________ More people have died driving with Ted Kennedy than hunting with Dick Cheney.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Driver
|
Posted: Nov 26, 2008 - 11:43 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Aug 13, 2005 - 07:14 PM
Posts: 185
Status: Offline
|
Well problem is it's not the RNLAF or BAF or RAF or whatever that we're talking about here. We're talking about the USAF, which means USA. From the story you can make out that his father hasn't really got the means to have a deserved retirement and it also often says that the recruit in question finally decided to do something with his life.
1 and 1 makes 11 (hehe think about it) and it's rather easy to assume that he doesn't really have the money. So it's Medicaid for him which like it or not, in the USA it wont get you on expensive treatments if the standard fails.
I think it isn't as easy as you said AfterburnerDecalsScott (shorter nick please ) this guy probably had a choice: at least take a few more weeks of AF treatment and be treaten as if he were a Chinese spy caught trying to smuggle an F-22 out of the country or go on medicade and lessen his chances against the disease. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|