Forum: F-16 versus XYZ

F16 Block 52 versus a Sukhoi 30 MKI



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1, 2
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
biffbutkus
PostPosted: Nov 21, 2008 - 02:42 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Mar 24, 2007 - 07:05 PM
Posts: 102

Status: Offline
asianviper wrote:
Just how good are russian air to air missiles in general?? How do they compare in general to american missile technology?

I believe that you can have all the range in the world but if the electronics and seeker heads are not upto the job you will always lose against an opponent with a shorter range missile with better hardware inside it.
Does the Block 52 have anything comparable to the IRST on the SU30?


While I cannot provide any evidence at this time to back-up my opinion, there is some stuff that I have seen posted on the net that seems to point to a lack of performance for the R-77. The main problem being high-drag and as a result, lower than expected kinematic performance. There were some alledgedly fired in anger in Africa with no success.

I would think that ithe R77 would be quite manueverable at shorter ranges but with a short NEZ. I'm no expert and that is just my opinion. I'm also really not so sure (perhaps mistakenly so) about its ability to guide to a distant target. How good is its data-link capability? What about the batteries and seeker head? I have read that they are sourcing some of the same TI chips that US defense contractors use Rolling Eyes but I'm sure you realize the total package is greater than the sum of its parts....

_________________
USAF B52 ECM TECH '92-'97
Flight Sim In-Flight Technician
Charter Member Virtual Mile High Club
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 26, 2012 - 4:55 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
Angels225
PostPosted: Nov 21, 2008 - 08:13 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Jul 26, 2005 - 03:48 PM
Posts: 106

Status: Offline
yakuza wrote:
asianviper wrote:

Does the Block 52 have anything comparable to the IRST on the SU30?


the Sniper is more accurate and has more range,and can track on A2A..


Im one of those part time enthusiasts but I thought the sniper was purely an A2G pod...the Rafale,Su and EF all have built in IRST but thiers was tailored specifically for A2A though it can be used A2G.. however the sniper was specifically built as a targeting pod wasnt it??
Coming back to the topic. Ive had quite a few discussions with pilots who will actually might have to face the MKI in actual combat Wink and they were more concerned with its BVR capability, when I inquired about WVR and furballs they seemed confident that the TVC (unless used by an experienced fella) had little effect in a dogfight..albiet they did express concerns about the off boresight missles but apparently tactics exist to counter even that.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
SpudmanWP
PostPosted: Nov 21, 2008 - 08:37 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 3321
Location: California
Status: Offline
From LM PDF
Quote:
• Air-to-air target detection and tracking
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Angels225
PostPosted: Nov 22, 2008 - 04:23 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Jul 26, 2005 - 03:48 PM
Posts: 106

Status: Offline
Interesting.. so it can give the viper or any other compatible jet optical tracking along with targeting.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
sprstdlyscottsmn
PostPosted: Nov 24, 2008 - 06:51 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Mar 10, 2006 - 01:24 AM
Posts: 1111

Status: Offline
is the internal IRST on the Blk 60 comparable to the SNIPER?

_________________
James,

-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic (WTF?)
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
yakuza
PostPosted: Nov 24, 2008 - 07:48 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Nov 08, 2008 - 06:17 PM
Posts: 205

Status: Offline
I dont think so,Sniper is the latest and most sophisticated Pods till now,it´s also bigger than any internal IRST which are smaller,so it´s more acurate and sees at very long range,most internal IRSTs are in the 25mi class,Sniper sees at distances of up to 86 naut. mi

quoting Aviationweek 2004
Quote:
At one point the pilot climbed to about 30,000 ft. MSL, selected a navigation steerpoint and noted that the Sniper pod was aimed at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). In IR black-hot, 2X zoom, area track mode, aircraft 86 naut. mi. away were visible as white spots taking off from LAX runways. Switching to TV mode produced a murky image, our view obscured by smog. Small clouds between us and the airport occasionally forced me to break lock and select "cursor zero," which pointed the pod at the lat-long coordinates for LAX and brought the airport back into view


Quote:
*Tracking another F-16, first with our radar, then handing off to the Sniper XR. Griffiths had some difficulty locating the other fighter in IR white-hot/wide FOV, but finally locked the point-tracker onto the bright-white engine tailpipe. Switching from IR tracking to TV tracking caused the system to break-lock--an anomaly that will be corrected as part of several air-to-air enhancements planned for the next Sniper software update. It also will give the pod a multi-target tracking capability. Griffiths subsequently locked-onto a Boeing 737 commercial transport at 27 naut. mi. The airframe type was easily determined, but we couldn't read the airline name in either IR or TV modes.


cheers
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2012 F-16.net