| Author |
Message |
|
EASTWOOD
|
Posted: Sep 10, 2008 - 09:03 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jul 30, 2008 - 12:07 AM
Posts: 20
Status: Offline
|
... but what do you think about our RAFALE ?
any chance again a F-22 in a dogfight ?
(remember VIPER and HORNET ... shot down by french navy's F2 !!) |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 26, 2012 - 4:28 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
outlaw162
|
Posted: Sep 10, 2008 - 09:13 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Feb 28, 2008 - 02:33 AM
Posts: 907
Status: Offline
|
Were the Viper & Hornet pilots able to eject successfully? Are they OK?
regards OL |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
EASTWOOD
|
Posted: Sep 10, 2008 - 09:20 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jul 30, 2008 - 12:07 AM
Posts: 20
Status: Offline
|
| just training between USN + BELGIAN AF + FRENCH ROYALE ... but with VERY good results for CDG' guys ! |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
LinkF16SimDude
|
Posted: Sep 10, 2008 - 09:53 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Jan 31, 2004 - 07:18 PM
Posts: 2232
Status: Offline
|
I'll let some RAF Typhoon guys respond for me:
"Well, if you can see the bloody thing you have a chance... not a great chance but about the same as an F-15 or F-16 has against us. The problem is the AAMRAM is up your a$$ long before you can possibly see it. Quite discouraging 'do' at Nellis, really".
From this thread |
_________________ Why does "monosyllabic" have 5 syllables?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Satorian
|
Posted: Sep 10, 2008 - 11:14 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Aug 11, 2007 - 10:04 PM
Posts: 29
Status: Offline
|
|
LinkF16SimDude wrote:
I'll let some RAF Typhoon guys respond for me:
"Well, if you can see the bloody thing you have a chance... not a great chance but about the same as an F-15 or F-16 has against us. The problem is the AAMRAM is up your a$$ long before you can possibly see it. Quite discouraging 'do' at Nellis, really".
From this thread
Would be nice to have some more info about that. Apparently the Typhoon was at Davis-Monthan for A-G trials and only flew strike missions. Were F-22s even present at that time? Or were those Typhoon pilots supposed to comment some other unspecified occasion of contact with the F-22? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Unwin
|
Posted: Sep 11, 2008 - 12:18 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Apr 11, 2008 - 08:56 AM
Posts: 99
Status: Offline
|
|
Quote:
(remember VIPER and HORNET ... shot down by french navy's F2 !!)
Well I guess when you can't win at real war you can be excited about winning exercises. Way to go France!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
outlaw162
|
Posted: Sep 11, 2008 - 01:41 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Feb 28, 2008 - 02:33 AM
Posts: 907
Status: Offline
|
|
EASTWOOD wrote:
just training between USN + BELGIAN AF + FRENCH ROYALE ... but with VERY good results for CDG' guys !
Whew, I thought I missed something on CNN.
regards, OL |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
hobojet
|
Posted: Sep 11, 2008 - 03:45 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Aug 07, 2008 - 06:03 PM
Posts: 82
Status: Offline
|
| According to my reaserch the f-22 would win in long range, but up close it has less manueverability and therefore would lose. but you can never really tell who would win without knowing the ability of the pilots.therefore my opinion is the euro fighter and the F-22 are equal, maybe F-22 a little better. |
_________________ reno air races woohoo!!! if anyone fly's in them let me know and I'll root you on. haha!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
That_Engine_Guy
|
Posted: Sep 11, 2008 - 04:23 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Dec 14, 2005 - 05:03 AM
Posts: 2168
Location: Under the engine somewhere.
Status: Offline
|
F-22 = A lot better.
Thrust vector + post-stall maneuvers = WIN
(Unless the pilot of said Raptor is asleep...) |
_________________ [Airplanes are] near perfect, all they lack is the ability to forgive.
— Richard Collins
|
|
|
|
 |
|
LinkF16SimDude
|
Posted: Sep 11, 2008 - 04:33 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Jan 31, 2004 - 07:18 PM
Posts: 2232
Status: Offline
|
|
hobojet wrote:
According to my reaserch the f-22 would win in long range, but up close it has less manueverability and therefore would lose.
I wanna be there when you tell that to Max Moga.  |
_________________ Why does "monosyllabic" have 5 syllables?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
hobojet
|
Posted: Sep 11, 2008 - 04:59 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Aug 07, 2008 - 06:03 PM
Posts: 82
Status: Offline
|
| so was I wrong about manueverability? because I didn't have a good recource(the guy next to me). |
_________________ reno air races woohoo!!! if anyone fly's in them let me know and I'll root you on. haha!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
c5crewchief
|
Posted: Sep 11, 2008 - 06:17 AM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Jan 18, 2008 - 06:29 PM
Posts: 9
Status: Offline
|
|
hobojet wrote:
so was I wrong about manueverability? because I didn't have a good recource(the guy next to me).
I've seen the F-22 do it's manuevers in airshows. I've yet to see anything live or on video that demonstrates that any of the euro canards are more manueverable than the raptor. From the F/A-18F demos I've seen, it seems the SH is also more manueverable than the euro canards. The only other fighter that seems to be able to manuever as well or better would be a thrust vectored SU-27. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
nam11b
|
Posted: Sep 11, 2008 - 06:24 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: May 29, 2008 - 10:46 AM
Posts: 268
Status: Offline
|
|
hobojet wrote:
According to my reaserch the f-22 would win in long range, but up close it has less manueverability and therefore would lose. but you can never really tell who would win without knowing the ability of the pilots.therefore my opinion is the euro fighter and the F-22 are equal, maybe F-22 a little better.
The only way the F-22 is going to get into a fight with you within visual range is if all missiles are expended and he has already lined up on your 6. It is an incredibly maneuverable airframe and the driver only needs to push it when he really wants to. The better answer; if he has missiles, you are dead well before you ever see him |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
F16NDI
|
Posted: Sep 11, 2008 - 06:30 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jul 03, 2008 - 02:22 AM
Posts: 54
Status: Offline
|
| Any aircraft is only as good as it's driver, I've seen ACMI video where the good old F4G Phantom waxed the F16C and F15C during a DACT training mission the Phantom driver at the time was a Vietnam veteran who knew how to make the jet tick. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
c5crewchief
|
Posted: Sep 11, 2008 - 06:46 AM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Jan 18, 2008 - 06:29 PM
Posts: 9
Status: Offline
|
|
F16NDI wrote:
Any aircraft is only as good as it's driver, I've seen ACMI video where the good old F4G Phantom waxed the F16C and F15C during a DACT training mission the Phantom driver at the time was a Vietnam veteran who knew how to make the jet tick.
Normally, I would agree with this statement, but.....The Red Flag and Northern Edge exercises had F-22 drivers up against aggressor F-15s and F-16s, which were flown mostly by veteran pilots. The aggressors couldn't see the raptor, which resulted in the high air to air "kills". |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|