F-16.net

Printed from: F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference [http://www.f-16.net]
Document title: F-16.net - F-22 06-4110? anyone know where it is? :: F-16.net :: The Ultimate F-16 Reference
Original URL: http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-10762-sid-22564b37d294c2da0b975cc16e8c2f40.html
Printed on: 08 September 2008

Forum: F-22A Raptor

F-22 06-4110? anyone know where it is?



Search Search  Register Register  Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
bandit66
PostPosted: Jul 24, 2008 - 08:42 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Regular User
Regular User


Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Posts: 50

Status: Offline
I have been building an F-22 database for a few years now and I have records for ever aircraft up to 123. The only problem is Ive been looking for 110 for almost six months with no luck. Ive tried everything; no units, no sightings, nothing. The aircraft should have been sent to its unit around february of 2008 with test flights at marietta around december of 2007. Anyone have any idea? I believe it should have been going to Elmendorf afb with the 90th fs but a friend in the squadron says he's never seen it. I also know its not at nellis or holloman and tyndall and langley havent received any new aircraft besides a couple trades....so what the heck? did they miscount and not serial a 110. I know its not possible I just cant seem to figure this out....
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Sep 08, 2008 - 1:23 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor






This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member.
   
 
seruriermarshal
PostPosted: Jul 24, 2008 - 10:47 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Jun 10, 2007
Posts: 12

Status: Offline
Maybe they send it to Edwards
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Asif
PostPosted: Jul 24, 2008 - 11:12 AM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Aug 23, 2003
Posts: 1678

She exisits alright as her DD250 date is 17 December 2007

_________________
Asif Shamim
F-16.net Editorial staff & Patch Gallery Administration
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
ATFS_Crash
PostPosted: Jul 24, 2008 - 11:46 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: Dec 15, 2006
Posts: 440

I think she is on loan to the Asgard to study her advanced technology, so they can advance their aircraft. The Goa'uld are protesting and claiming it is a violation of the Protected Planets Treaty; because it would give the Asgard a leap in technology. Wink j/k
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
m306640
PostPosted: Jul 24, 2008 - 04:37 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Jul 24, 2008
Posts: 1

Status: Offline
EDIT: Deleted


Last edited by m306640 on Jul 25, 2008 - 01:38 PM; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
bandit66
PostPosted: Jul 24, 2008 - 09:10 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Regular User
Regular User


Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Posts: 50

Status: Offline
Wonder where it has been....but thanks for the info!!! now does anyone know where birds 123 to 125 are going!?!!?!?!?!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Asif
PostPosted: Jul 24, 2008 - 09:49 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Aug 23, 2003
Posts: 1678

m306640 wrote:
Tail number 06-110 is at Elmendorf as of May 23, 2008


Do you know which squadron its assigned to?

_________________
Asif Shamim
F-16.net Editorial staff & Patch Gallery Administration
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Beazz
PostPosted: Jul 25, 2008 - 03:46 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active member
Active member


Joined: Sep 15, 2007
Posts: 109

Status: Offline
ATFS_Crash wrote:
I think she is on loan to the Asgard to study her advanced technology, so they can advance their aircraft. The Goa'uld are protesting and claiming it is a violation of the Protected Planets Treaty; because it would give the Asgard a leap in technology. Wink j/k


Well aS long as the Wraith's don't get it. Smile I luv SG Atlantis. Great show Wink
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
ATFS_Crash
PostPosted: Jul 25, 2008 - 05:13 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: Dec 15, 2006
Posts: 440

Beazz wrote:
ATFS_Crash wrote:
I think she is on loan to the Asgard to study her advanced technology, so they can advance their aircraft. The Goa'uld are protesting and claiming it is a violation of the Protected Planets Treaty; because it would give the Asgard a leap in technology. Wink j/k


Well aS long as the Wraith's don't get it. Smile I luv SG Atlantis. Great show Wink
I was being silly. I like Stargate also.

My silliness, was my way of saying that I don’t think it’s proper to discuss the current location of all our F-22’s, unless otherwise made public through the proper channels with permission.

For all I know this information may be public knowledge, but unless I know it is, I don’t like it being discussed. I’m an old fuddy-duddy that way.


I don’t think it’s gentlemanly to be too specific about, troops/force/equipment size, type, distribution, location and readiness.

Not that I'm much of a gentleman, but in some manners like these I try to be.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Beazz
PostPosted: Jul 25, 2008 - 08:24 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active member
Active member


Joined: Sep 15, 2007
Posts: 109

Status: Offline
ATFS_Crash wrote:
Beazz wrote:
ATFS_Crash wrote:
I think she is on loan to the Asgard to study her advanced technology, so they can advance their aircraft. The Goa'uld are protesting and claiming it is a violation of the Protected Planets Treaty; because it would give the Asgard a leap in technology. Wink j/k


Well aS long as the Wraith's don't get it. Smile I luv SG Atlantis. Great show Wink
I was being silly. I like Stargate also.

My silliness, was my way of saying that I don’t think it’s proper to discuss the current location of all our F-22’s, unless otherwise made public through the proper channels with permission.

For all I know this information may be public knowledge, but unless I know it is, I don’t like it being discussed. I’m an old fuddy-duddy that way.


I don’t think it’s gentlemanly to be too specific about, troops/force/equipment size, type, distribution, location and readiness.

Not that I'm much of a gentleman, but in some manners like these I try to be.


Couldn't agree with ya more. I personally don't even think that individuals that are actually involed with any of those things should be on here confirming or denying it even if it is public knowledge. Seems to me when a person actually in the know does that, they now give it a higher level of credibility that it did not have just by being public knowledge.

Beazz
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
EASTWOOD
PostPosted: Aug 10, 2008 - 11:37 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Jul 30, 2008
Posts: 8

Status: Offline
Hi bandit66 !

I'm trying to have an updated F-22 database too, but it's difficult from France ...
Can you post your own list (ELMENDORF + HOLLOMAN jets) ?

Thanks
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2008 Lieven Dewitte and Stefaan Vanhastel