| Author |
Message |
|
MikeJames
|
Posted: Jul 06, 2008 - 04:45 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Jul 06, 2008
Posts: 16
Status: Offline
|
A recent airshow was my first time seeing the Raptor in person, and I took a lot of photos. As a designer, (CAD and RC models, not actual aircraft) it is a thing of beauty.
It caught me by surprise to find the rather large gap at the base of each vertical fin, where the rear section meets the fuselage. Does anyone know why that is? (Seems like it would create a lot of drag.) |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Oct 11, 2008 - 10:05 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tinito_16
|
Posted: Jul 06, 2008 - 04:18 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: May 31, 2007
Posts: 243
Status: Offline
|
| Can you give me a link to a photo? I've got alot of pics of the Raptor but I'm not quite sure what you mean. |
_________________ "Like the coldest winter chill, heaven beside you...hell within" Alice In Chains
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tinito_16
|
Posted: Jul 06, 2008 - 07:00 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: May 31, 2007
Posts: 243
Status: Offline
|
| Is this the gap you speak of? (kind of hard to see but it's got a red circle around it) |
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
71 KB |
| Viewed: |
3372 Time(s) |

|
_________________ "Like the coldest winter chill, heaven beside you...hell within" Alice In Chains
|
|
|
|
 |
|
MikeJames
|
Posted: Jul 07, 2008 - 01:56 AM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Jul 06, 2008
Posts: 16
Status: Offline
|
That's it. (base of both vertical fins)
I'm sure that's not an "manufacturing error", since all the Raptor photos I've seen have it, but I don't recall seeing that kind of thing on any modern aircraft. |
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
424.24 KB |
| Viewed: |
3274 Time(s) |

|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
VarkVet
|
Posted: Jul 07, 2008 - 02:37 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Oct 30, 2006
Posts: 644
Status: Offline
|
| I’m not an aerodynamicist, but since modern day fighters are starting to to look like F-1 cars with the bulges and gaps. I would have to say the gap is a means of providing laminar airflow to help cool that complex engine nozzle system. |
_________________ My eyes have seen the glory of the Lord and the esthetics of the Flightline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sferrin
|
Posted: Jul 07, 2008 - 02:47 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 22, 2005
Posts: 1006
Status: Offline
|
| All it is really is a fairing and isn't load bearing (other than from aero forces) so there's no need for it to be attached at the bottom which simplifies manufacturing. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tinito_16
|
Posted: Jul 07, 2008 - 02:52 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: May 31, 2007
Posts: 243
Status: Offline
|
| Evidently it doesn't affect RCS. That's incredible, considering that I read somewhere that a loose nut was the difference between an invisible F-117 and one that had dangerous RCS flareups. |
_________________ "Like the coldest winter chill, heaven beside you...hell within" Alice In Chains
|
|
|
|
 |
|
VarkVet
|
Posted: Jul 07, 2008 - 04:05 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Oct 30, 2006
Posts: 644
Status: Offline
|
Look at the streaks on the airframe coming from the gap (leaky something) streaks go straight from the gap to the nozzle showing the airflow.
Alpha Romero did this with the DTM upswept pipes you see on kids Hondas nowadays.
The hot air from the exhaust flowed up behind the rear wing causing more cold air to fall on the wing creating more down force.
Bernoulli’s Principal I believe. |
_________________ My eyes have seen the glory of the Lord and the esthetics of the Flightline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sferrin
|
Posted: Jul 07, 2008 - 04:17 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 22, 2005
Posts: 1006
Status: Offline
|
|
Tinito_16 wrote:
Evidently it doesn't affect RCS. That's incredible, considering that I read somewhere that a loose nut was the difference between an invisible F-117 and one that had dangerous RCS flareups.
It's all RAM/RAS there. The piece you're thinking of was a metal screw on Have Blue. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tinito_16
|
Posted: Jul 07, 2008 - 03:40 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: May 31, 2007
Posts: 243
Status: Offline
|
| Another thing I notice is right angles... Isn't that unstealthy? |
_________________ "Like the coldest winter chill, heaven beside you...hell within" Alice In Chains
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sferrin
|
Posted: Jul 07, 2008 - 04:10 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 22, 2005
Posts: 1006
Status: Offline
|
|
Tinito_16 wrote:
Another thing I notice is right angles... Isn't that unstealthy?
If it were a reflector. It's not. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tinito_16
|
Posted: Jul 07, 2008 - 09:49 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: May 31, 2007
Posts: 243
Status: Offline
|
|
sferrin wrote:
Tinito_16 wrote:
Another thing I notice is right angles... Isn't that unstealthy?
If it were a reflector. It's not.
Well but doesn't the aircraft itself reflect some radar waves? Or did they figure out how to make an object steathy regardless of it's shape?
This is in no way a doubt about the Raptor's stealth, I just found it interesting that there seem to be right angles in some of the panels on the back end of the plane. |
_________________ "Like the coldest winter chill, heaven beside you...hell within" Alice In Chains
|
|
|
|
 |
|
That_Engine_Guy
|
Posted: Jul 07, 2008 - 11:26 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Dec 14, 2005
Posts: 743
Status: Offline
|
Just like tanks where the armor is thinnest on the rear; in stealth aircraft the rear has typically been the most visible on radar. (Especially since the F119s have augmentors, similar to the F101 and RCS of the Bone.) Trunking or masking inside the inlets works up front, but you can't do that in an afterburner!
I'd venture to guess that the augmentor ducts/flame-holders reflect more radar than those little 90* panel lines between the airframe and engine nozzle.
My
TEG |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
cywolf32
|
Posted: Jul 08, 2008 - 02:23 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Nov 21, 2005
Posts: 77
Status: Offline
|
Could be a bleed air section for the engine bay to prevent fuel vapor build up. F-16's have them on both sides inboard of the speed brakes. Seems logical at least and would explain the build-up of fluids in that area. Even though there is a gap, there does seem to be some good shaping there. Also, just look above to the rudders. The gap is very similar.  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Obamanite
|
Posted: Jul 08, 2008 - 02:42 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: May 26, 2008
Posts: 311
Status: Offline
|
|
Tinito_16 wrote:
Another thing I notice is right angles... Isn't that unstealthy?
Dude, you should write LM a letter. They need to know about your discovery just as soon as possible! They must have forgotten to keep their rear end shapely! |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|